A Comparison of the Shear Bond Strength between a Luting Composite Resin and Both Machinable and Printable Ceramic-Glass Polymer Materials

被引:0
|
作者
Aydin, Nazli [1 ,2 ]
Celik Oge, Selin [1 ]
Guney, Ogulcan [3 ]
Okbaz, Onur [3 ]
Sertdemir, Yasar [4 ]
机构
[1] Cukurova Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Prosthodont, TR-01250 Adana, Turkiye
[2] Cukurova Univ, Abdi Sutcu Vocat Sch Hlth Serv, TR-01790 Adana, Turkiye
[3] Cukurova Univ, Fac Dent, TR-01250 Adana, Turkiye
[4] Cukurova Univ, Fac Med, Dept Biostat & Med Informat, TR-01790 Adana, Turkiye
关键词
three-dimensional printing; 3D printed permanent resin; printable permanent resin; ceramic glass polymer materials; shear bond strength; self-adhesive luting composite; CURE ADHESIVE CEMENT; SURFACE; AGENT;
D O I
10.3390/ma17194697
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
This study aims to compare the shear bond strength (SBS) and Weibull characteristics between a luting composite resin and both printable and two different machinable ceramic-glass polymer materials. A total of 36 substrates were prepared, with 12 in each group. Printable substrates (12 mm x 12 mm x 2 mm) were printed by using permanent crown resin (3D-PR). Machinable substrates were obtained from Cerasmart 270 (CS) and Vita Enamic (VE) blocks (2 mm in thickness). The bonding surfaces of substrates were polished and airborne abraded (50 mu m Al2O3). A self-adhesive luting composite resin (RelyX U200, 3M ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA, SLC) was applied on substrates with the help of a cylindrical (& Oslash;3 x 3 mm) mold. The SBS test was conducted using a universal test machine. The SBSs of three materials were compared using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) (alpha = 0.05). The Weibull modulus was calculated for each material. The Kruskal-Wallis and chi-square tests were carried out for the failure mode analysis. There was no significant difference between the SBSs of the three materials (p = 0.129). The Weibull modulus was 3.76 for the 3D-PR, 4.22 for the CS, and 6.52 for the VE group. Statistical analysis showed no significant difference between the failure modes of the groups (p = 0.986). Mixed-failure fractures were predominantly observed in all three groups. The results show that the SBS of the SLC to printable 3D-PR is comparable to that of CS and VE material. Failure modes of printable 3D-PR show similar results with two different machinable ceramic-glass polymers.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Shear bond strength of resin luting cement to glass-infiltrated porous aluminum oxide cores
    Sen, D
    Poyrazoglu, E
    Tuncelli, B
    Göller, G
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2000, 83 (02): : 210 - 215
  • [22] The effect of ceramic primer on shear bond strength of resin composite cement to zirconia
    Keul, Christine
    Liebermann, Anja
    Roos, Malgorzata
    Uhrenbacher, Julia
    Stawarczyk, Bogna
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION, 2013, 144 (11): : 1261 - 1271
  • [23] Effect of surface treatments on shear bond strength of resin composite bonded to CAD/CAM resin-ceramic hybrid materials
    Gungor, Merve Bankoglu
    Nemli, Secil Karakoca
    Bal, Bilge Turhan
    Unver, Senem
    Dogan, Aylin
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED PROSTHODONTICS, 2016, 8 (04): : 259 - 266
  • [24] The effect of surface treatment on the shear bond strength of luting cement to a glass-infiltrated alumina ceramic
    Özcan, M
    Alkumru, HN
    Gemalmaz, D
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS, 2001, 14 (04) : 335 - 339
  • [25] Shear bond strengths of four resin bonding systems to two silica-based machinable ceramic materials
    Kamada, Kohji
    Yoshida, Keiichi
    Taira, Yohsuke
    Sawase, Takashi
    Atsuta, Mitsuru
    DENTAL MATERIALS JOURNAL, 2006, 25 (03) : 621 - 625
  • [26] A Comparison of Shear Bond Strength of Ceramic and Resin Denture Teeth on Different Acrylic Resin Bases
    Corsalini, Massimo
    Di Venere, Daniela
    Pettini, Francesco
    Stefanachi, Gianluca
    Catapano, Santo
    Boccaccio, Antonio
    Lamberti, Luciano
    Pappalettere, Carmine
    Carossa, Stefano
    OPEN DENTISTRY JOURNAL, 2014, 8 : 241 - 250
  • [27] Surface Treatment Effect on Shear Bond Strength between Lithium Disilicate Glass-Ceramic and Resin Cement
    Simasetha, Siripan
    Klaisiri, Awiruth
    Sriamporn, Tool
    Sappayatosok, Kraisorn
    Thamrongananskul, Niyom
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2022, 16 (02) : 373 - 380
  • [28] THE SHEAR BOND STRENGTH BETWEEN COMPOSITE RESIN TO AMALGAM WITH DIFFERENTS ADHESIVES
    SOUZA, JB
    FRANCO, EB
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1995, 74 (03) : 800 - 800
  • [29] Effect of a silane and phosphate functional monomer on shear bond strength of a resin-based luting agent to lithium disilicate ceramic and quartz materials
    Taguchi, Serina
    Komine, Futoshi
    Kubochi, Kei
    Fushiki, Ryosuke
    Kimura, Fumiaki
    Matsumura, Hideo
    JOURNAL OF ORAL SCIENCE, 2018, 60 (03) : 360 - 366
  • [30] Shear Bond Comparison between 4 Bioceramic Materials and Dual-cure Composite Resin
    Hursh, Kelley A.
    Kirkpatrick, Timothy C.
    Cardon, Jared W.
    Brewster, John A.
    Black, Steven W.
    Himel, Van T.
    Sabey, Kent A.
    JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 2019, 45 (11) : 1378 - 1383