Automated people mover: A comparison between conventional and permanent magnets MAGLEV systems

被引:2
|
作者
Lutzemberger G. [1 ]
Musolino A. [1 ]
Rizzo R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Energy, Systems, Territory and Constructions Engineering, University of Pisa, Largo L. Lazzarino n. 1, Pisa
来源
Lutzemberger, Giovanni (lutzemberger@dsea.unipi.it) | 1600年 / Institution of Engineering and Technology, United States卷 / 07期
关键词
Magnetic levitation;
D O I
10.1049/iet-est.2017.0004
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
An automated people mover (APM) is a system used in urban/suburban areas to transport passengers point to point with a high frequency and a reliable service. Although conventional wheel-on-rail/route systems are commonly used in APMs, the application of the magnetic levitation (MAGLEV) technology in this field sounds promising. Since this technology replaces the wheels by electromagnetic systems, there is no contact between the levitating vehicle and the guideway. This implies zero wear, reduced maintenance and virtually no noise and vibrations. Efficiency, lightweight and cheapness represent expected additional benefits. The aim of thisstudy is to show, through a theoretical analysis based on a real APM and on a simulated automated MAGLEV people mover (AMPM), how the low-speed MAGLEV applications can compete with conventional wheel/ rail technology. The levitation and guiding forces in a permanent magnets-based AMPM have been obtained by using an FEM code. Then, a simulation tool, based on Modelica language, has been developed to perform a comparison between a conventional APM and an AMPM, in terms of power and energy requirements engaged in urban routes. Finally, a brief preliminary estimation of costs for the major AMPM subsystems has been presented. © The Institution of Engineering and Technology 2017.
引用
收藏
页码:295 / 302
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Design criteria and comparison between conventional and subaperture SAR processing in airborne systems
    Prats, P
    Bara, M
    Broquetas, A
    SAR IMAGE ANALYSIS, MODELING, AND TECHNIQUES IV, 2002, 4543 : 13 - 23
  • [42] A comparison of the growth performance between cattle reared in conventional systems and in feral conditions
    Nogales, Sergio
    Calderon, Juan
    Lupi, Teresa Marta
    Bressan, Maria Cristina
    Vicente Delgado, Juan
    Esperanza Camacho, Maria
    LIVESTOCK SCIENCE, 2017, 206 : 154 - 160
  • [43] Comparison between alternating aerobic-anoxic and conventional activated sludge systems
    Balku, Saziye
    WATER RESEARCH, 2007, 41 (10) : 2220 - 2228
  • [44] A comparison between conventional and the Paris systems of reporting urinary cytopathology with a literature update
    Kannan, Narasimhapriyan
    Gochhait, Debasis
    Ramanitharan, Manikandan
    Siddaraju, Neelaiah
    DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, 2024, 52 (04) : 187 - 199
  • [45] Dose comparison between conventional and quasi-monochromatic systems for diagnostic radiology
    Baldelli, P
    Taibi, A
    Tuffanelli, A
    Gambaccini, M
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2004, 49 (17): : 4135 - 4146
  • [46] Comparison of Conventional Methods and Automated Systems for Determining Antibiotic Susceptibility of Bacteria Isolated from Urine Culture
    Kocoglu, Mucahide Esra
    Davarci, Ismail
    Guney, Rabia
    Tascilar, Melike
    Zengin, Ferhat
    Samsati, Mustafa
    BANGLADESH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2019, 18 (03): : 519 - 526
  • [47] Comparison of the Using Ability Between a Smartphone and a Conventional Mobile Phone in People With Cervical Cord Injury
    Kim, Seongkyu
    Lee, Bum-Suk
    Kim, Ji Min
    ANNALS OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE-ARM, 2014, 38 (02): : 183 - 188
  • [48] Design and Comparison of Radial Flux Magnetic Levitation Systems Based on Conventional and Buried Permanent Magnet Types Rotors
    Gulec, Mehmet
    Yolacan, Ersin
    Aydin, Metin
    2018 XIII INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ELECTRICAL MACHINES (ICEM), 2018, : 642 - 648
  • [49] Comparison between two automated systems to determine specific IgE: CAP and ELItest
    Brunnee, T
    Seeberger, A
    KleineTebbe, J
    Kunkel, G
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL ALLERGY, 1996, 26 (12): : 1420 - 1427
  • [50] Comparison of power factor between permanent magnet assisted synchronous reluctance motor with neodymium-iron-boron and ferrite magnets
    Siadatan, Alireza
    Goltieb, Jacob
    Afjei, Ibrahim
    2020 INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON POWER ELECTRONICS, ELECTRICAL DRIVES, AUTOMATION AND MOTION (SPEEDAM 2020), 2020, : 144 - 150