Automated people mover: A comparison between conventional and permanent magnets MAGLEV systems

被引:2
|
作者
Lutzemberger G. [1 ]
Musolino A. [1 ]
Rizzo R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Energy, Systems, Territory and Constructions Engineering, University of Pisa, Largo L. Lazzarino n. 1, Pisa
来源
Lutzemberger, Giovanni (lutzemberger@dsea.unipi.it) | 1600年 / Institution of Engineering and Technology, United States卷 / 07期
关键词
Magnetic levitation;
D O I
10.1049/iet-est.2017.0004
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
An automated people mover (APM) is a system used in urban/suburban areas to transport passengers point to point with a high frequency and a reliable service. Although conventional wheel-on-rail/route systems are commonly used in APMs, the application of the magnetic levitation (MAGLEV) technology in this field sounds promising. Since this technology replaces the wheels by electromagnetic systems, there is no contact between the levitating vehicle and the guideway. This implies zero wear, reduced maintenance and virtually no noise and vibrations. Efficiency, lightweight and cheapness represent expected additional benefits. The aim of thisstudy is to show, through a theoretical analysis based on a real APM and on a simulated automated MAGLEV people mover (AMPM), how the low-speed MAGLEV applications can compete with conventional wheel/ rail technology. The levitation and guiding forces in a permanent magnets-based AMPM have been obtained by using an FEM code. Then, a simulation tool, based on Modelica language, has been developed to perform a comparison between a conventional APM and an AMPM, in terms of power and energy requirements engaged in urban routes. Finally, a brief preliminary estimation of costs for the major AMPM subsystems has been presented. © The Institution of Engineering and Technology 2017.
引用
收藏
页码:295 / 302
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A COST COMPARISON BETWEEN CONVENTIONAL AND DETAINED DRAINAGE SYSTEMS
    LEE, KB
    HAM, P
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, 1986, 13 (04) : 405 - 411
  • [22] Economic comparison between conventional aquaponics and FLOCponics systems
    Pinho, Sara M. M.
    Flores, Roberto Manolio Valladao H.
    David, Luiz H. K.
    Emerenciano, Mauricio G. C.
    Quagrainie, Kwamena K.
    Portella, Maria Celia
    AQUACULTURE, 2022, 552
  • [23] The cost of production in cervical cytology - Comparison of conventional and automated primary screening systems
    Bishop, JW
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 1997, 107 (04) : 445 - 450
  • [24] Quality comparison of umbilical cord blood cryopreserved with conventional versus automated systems
    Kim, Kyeong Mi
    Huh, Ji Young
    Kim, Jin Ju
    Kang, Myung Seo
    CRYOBIOLOGY, 2017, 78 : 65 - 69
  • [25] A comparison between conventional and flux-intensifying interior permanent magnet synchronous machines
    Shehata, E. G.
    INTERNATIONAL TRANSACTIONS ON ELECTRICAL ENERGY SYSTEMS, 2021, 31 (04)
  • [26] A Comparison Between Conventional and Flux-Intensifying Interior Permanent Magnet Synchronous Machines
    Shehata, E. G.
    2021 22ND IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGY (ICIT), 2021, : 121 - 126
  • [27] Comparison of Permanent Magnet Brushless Motors Designed for Automated Manual Transmission (AMT) Systems
    Junak, Jacek
    Ombach, Grzegorz
    ICEMS 2008: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 11TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ELECTRICAL MACHINES AND SYSTEMS, VOLS 1- 8, 2008, : 2773 - 2777
  • [28] Comparison between conventional and PV integrated curtain wall systems
    Sozer, H
    Elnimeiri, M
    SUSTAINABLE CITY II: URBAN REGENERATION AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2002, 14 : 1025 - 1034
  • [29] On the comparison between conventional OFDM and MSE-OFDM systems
    Wang, XB
    Wu, YY
    Chouinard, JY
    GLOBECOM'03: IEEE GLOBAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-7, 2003, : 35 - 39
  • [30] COMPARISON BETWEEN 4 AUTOMATED SYSTEMS FOR LEUKOCYTE DIFFERENTIAL COUNT
    JOU, JM
    VIVESCORRONS, JL
    AGUILAR, JL
    INSA, MJ
    ESTER, A
    DELOLMO, J
    COLOMER, E
    JOURNAL OF AUTOMATIC CHEMISTRY, 1982, 4 (02): : 100 - 101