Index system and methods for comprehensive assessment of cross-border power grid interconnection projects

被引:4
|
作者
Zhao T. [1 ]
Jiang Y. [2 ]
Jiang H. [1 ]
Gao Y. [1 ]
Wu W. [1 ]
Wang C. [1 ]
Zhu J. [3 ]
机构
[1] Global Energy Interconnection Group Co., Ltd, 100031, Beijing
[2] ABB Power Grids Investment (China) Limited, 100015, Beijing
[3] Hitachi ABB Power Grids, 901 Main Campus Drive, Suite 300, Raleigh
关键词
Comprehensive assessment index system; Cost–benefit analysis; Cross-border power grid interconnection; Iterative method; TOPSIS method;
D O I
10.1016/j.gloei.2021.01.006
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
With the global economy integration and progress in energy transformation, it has become a general trend to surpass national boundaries to achieve wider and optimal energy resource allocations. Consequently, there is a critical need to adopt scientific approaches in assessing cross-border power grid interconnection projects. First, considering the promotion of large-scale renewable energy resources and improvements in system adequacy, a comprehensive assessment index system, including costs, socio-economic benefits, environmental benefits, and technical benefits, is established in this study. Second, a synthetic assessment framework is proposed for cross-border power grid interconnection projects based on the index system comprising cost–benefit analysis, with market and network simulations, iterative methods for indicator weight evaluation, and technique for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution (TOPSIS) method for the project rankings. Finally, by assessing and comparing three cross-border projects between Europe and Asia, the proposed index system and assessment framework have been proved to be effective and feasible; the results of this system can thus support investment decision-making related to such projects in the future. © 2020 Global Energy Interconnection Development and Cooperation Organization
引用
收藏
页码:532 / 544
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Cross-border gas-line projects face daunting challenges
    Khene, DE
    OIL & GAS JOURNAL, 1997, 95 (50) : 33 - +
  • [42] Governance distance and the performance of cross-border private participation infrastructure projects
    Li, Yanxi
    Zhao, Heng
    Ouyang, Shanshan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGING PROJECTS IN BUSINESS, 2021, 14 (07) : 1485 - 1503
  • [43] Active Power Flow Control on Cross-Border Connections
    Bena, L'.
    Buczek, K.
    Rydz, P.
    Wachta, H.
    ANALYSIS AND SIMULATION OF ELECTRICAL AND COMPUTER SYSTEMS, 2018, 452 : 185 - 206
  • [44] Arctic Governance: Power in cross-border cooperation.
    Dahl, Justiina
    POLAR RECORD, 2019, 55 (06) : 532 - 533
  • [45] The thought of soft power in cross-border M&As
    Xu Jinfa
    Jiang Tao
    MODERN FINANCE AND GLOBAL TRADING COOPERATION: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 5TH INTERNATIONAL ANNUAL CONFERENCE ON WTO AND FINANCIAL ENGINEERING, 2008, : 655 - 658
  • [46] Identification and Assessment of Barriers to the Development of Cross-Border Cooperation
    Kurowska-Pysz, Joanna
    Wroblewski, Lukasz
    Szczepanska-Woszczyna, Katarzyna
    INNOVATION MANAGEMENT AND EDUCATION EXCELLENCE THROUGH VISION 2020, VOLS I -XI, 2018, : 3317 - 3327
  • [47] A framework for harmonized cross-border seismic risk assessment
    Babic, Anze
    Polese, Maria
    Tocchi, Gabriella
    Faravelli, Marta
    Borzi, Barbara
    Dolsek, Matjaz
    BULLETIN OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2025,
  • [48] An assessment of the Danish-German cross-border auctions
    Kristiansen, Tarjei
    ENERGY POLICY, 2007, 35 (06) : 3369 - 3382
  • [49] BIOCLIMATE RECREATION ASSESSMENT OF CROSS-BORDER AREA OF ALTAI
    Yevgenia, Garms O.
    Maria, Sukhova G.
    Tatiana, Romashova V.
    TOMSK STATE UNIVERSITY JOURNAL, 2013, (370): : 148 - +
  • [50] The comprehensive service system of cross-border e-commerce logistics enterprises and empirical study
    DingQiang
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2017 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EDUCATION, MANAGEMENT AND COMPUTING TECHNOLOGY (ICEMCT 2017), 2017, 101 : 1421 - 1426