Index system and methods for comprehensive assessment of cross-border power grid interconnection projects

被引:4
|
作者
Zhao T. [1 ]
Jiang Y. [2 ]
Jiang H. [1 ]
Gao Y. [1 ]
Wu W. [1 ]
Wang C. [1 ]
Zhu J. [3 ]
机构
[1] Global Energy Interconnection Group Co., Ltd, 100031, Beijing
[2] ABB Power Grids Investment (China) Limited, 100015, Beijing
[3] Hitachi ABB Power Grids, 901 Main Campus Drive, Suite 300, Raleigh
关键词
Comprehensive assessment index system; Cost–benefit analysis; Cross-border power grid interconnection; Iterative method; TOPSIS method;
D O I
10.1016/j.gloei.2021.01.006
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
With the global economy integration and progress in energy transformation, it has become a general trend to surpass national boundaries to achieve wider and optimal energy resource allocations. Consequently, there is a critical need to adopt scientific approaches in assessing cross-border power grid interconnection projects. First, considering the promotion of large-scale renewable energy resources and improvements in system adequacy, a comprehensive assessment index system, including costs, socio-economic benefits, environmental benefits, and technical benefits, is established in this study. Second, a synthetic assessment framework is proposed for cross-border power grid interconnection projects based on the index system comprising cost–benefit analysis, with market and network simulations, iterative methods for indicator weight evaluation, and technique for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution (TOPSIS) method for the project rankings. Finally, by assessing and comparing three cross-border projects between Europe and Asia, the proposed index system and assessment framework have been proved to be effective and feasible; the results of this system can thus support investment decision-making related to such projects in the future. © 2020 Global Energy Interconnection Development and Cooperation Organization
引用
收藏
页码:532 / 544
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] ON THE ASSESSMENT OF CROSS-BORDER REGIONS' DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL
    Bilchak, Mikhail V.
    BALTIC REGION, 2011, (02) : 119 - 124
  • [32] Cross-Border Capacity Assessment in Dementia Care
    Jongen, Wesley
    Commers, Matthew J.
    Schols, Jos M. G. A.
    Burazeri, Genc
    Brand, Helmut
    GESUNDHEITSWESEN, 2017, 79 (10) : E70 - E77
  • [33] Coordinating cross-border electricity interconnection investments and trade in market coupled regions
    Loureiro, Manuel, V
    Claro, Joao
    Fischbeck, Paul
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL POWER & ENERGY SYSTEMS, 2019, 104 : 194 - 204
  • [34] Study on Cross-border Network Purchasing through Agents Risk Evaluation Index System
    Chen, Jiajuan
    Wu, Yashuang
    RESEARCH IN MATERIALS AND MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGIES, PTS 1-3, 2014, 835-836 : 1947 - +
  • [35] Cross-border reincorporations in the European Union: the case for comprehensive harmonisation
    Gerner-Beuerle, Carsten
    Mucciarelli, Federico M.
    Schuster, Edmund
    Siems, Mathias
    JOURNAL OF CORPORATE LAW STUDIES, 2018, 18 (01) : 1 - 42
  • [36] MARKET BASED CROSS-BORDER CONGESTION MANAGEMENT METHODS
    Matelionis, Donatas
    Azubalis, Mindaugas
    ELECTRICAL AND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES, 2012, : 270 - 273
  • [37] Cross-border tourism and innovation system failures
    Makkonen, Teemu
    Williams, Allan M.
    ANNALS OF TOURISM RESEARCH, 2024, 105
  • [40] DESIGN AND VERIFICATION OF IMPLEMENTATION FACTORS OF CROSS-BORDER MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS PROJECTS*
    Heckova, Jaroslava
    Birknerova, Zuzana
    Chapcakova, Alexandra
    Zbihlejova, Lucia
    Stolarik, Peter
    ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND SUSTAINABILITY ISSUES, 2022, 10 (02): : 147 - 159