A framework for evaluating enhancement quality as part of the EIA process

被引:0
|
作者
Nisbet J. [1 ]
João E. [2 ]
机构
[1] Arup, 1 West Regent Street, Glasgow
[2] Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow
关键词
Biodiversity; Deliberate benefits; EIA best practice; Enhancement; Environmental impact assessment; Mitigation; Monitoring; Net-gain;
D O I
10.1016/j.eiar.2022.106806
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper presents a framework for evaluating the quality of enhancement of positive impacts in Environmental Impact Assessment reports (EIARs). The ‘Enhancement Quality Testing Framework’ created for this study is structured around four performance indicators to evaluate enhancement measures detailed in EIARs that focus on: Inclusion; Timing; Thoroughness; and Responsibility & Monitoring. In this way a holistic view of enhancement has been taken to create a framework to evaluate enhancement quality. The framework was tested in documentary research of 24 Scottish EIARs published between 2015 and 2020 (including relevant documents submitted as part of the planning application, such as Environmental Management Plans). The results highlighted a wide recognition of enhancement (70%) among the EIAR evaluated. However, the majority of grades assigned across the performance indicators for the reports examined fell within ‘Deficient’ or ‘Not Present’. The framework could be used and adapted by developers, consultants, decision makers and academics to provide insight, and to introduce accountability, regarding the quality of enhancement integration in EIA practice. © 2022 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A framework for evaluating organizational choice and process redesign issues
    Brooke, C
    JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, 2000, 15 (01) : 17 - 28
  • [32] A framework for evaluating approximation methods for Gaussian process regression
    Chalupka, K. (KJCHALUP@CALTECH.EDU), 1600, Microtome Publishing (14):
  • [33] A Framework for Evaluating Approximation Methods for Gaussian Process Regression
    Chalupka, Krzysztof
    Williams, Christopher K. I.
    Murray, Iain
    JOURNAL OF MACHINE LEARNING RESEARCH, 2013, 14 : 333 - 350
  • [34] Framework and process for evaluating the construction effectiveness of knowledge base
    Sun, Pei-Shan
    Fan, Zhi-Ping
    Chen, Xi
    Kang, Feng
    Dongbei Daxue Xuebao/Journal of Northeastern University, 2010, 31 (09): : 1361 - 1364
  • [35] Evaluating Website Quality by Addressing Quality Gaps: A Modular Process
    Mich, Luisa
    2014 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFTWARE SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND ENGINEERING (SWSTE), 2014, : 42 - 49
  • [36] Diploma research process: Evaluating the service quality
    Mathenge, E.K. (edkam210@yahoo.com), 1600, Emerald Group Holdings Ltd. (25):
  • [37] TECHNIQUES FOR EVALUATING DOT QUALITY IN HALFTONE PROCESS
    TJIMA, M
    KOMATSU, Y
    MIYAUCHI, T
    PHOTOGRAPHIC SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 1963, 7 (02): : 141 - 141
  • [38] Selecting and evaluating process parameters for quality assurance
    Bichler, M.
    Kunststoffe Plast Europe, 1994, 84 (10):
  • [39] New Quality Metrics for Evaluating Process Models
    Huang, Zan
    Kumar, Akhil
    BUSINESS PROCESS MANAGEMENT WORKSHOPS, 2009, 17 : 164 - 170
  • [40] Methods for Evaluating the Quality of Process Modelling Tools
    Pavlicek, Josef
    Pavlickova, Petra
    ENTERPRISE AND ORGANIZATIONAL MODELING AND SIMULATION, EOMAS 2018, 2018, 332 : 171 - 177