Economic and environmental benefits of the integration between carbon sequestration and underground gas storage

被引:2
|
作者
Zhang R. [1 ]
Wei J. [1 ]
Zhao X. [1 ]
Liu Y. [1 ]
机构
[1] School of Business Administration, China University of Petroleum-Beijing, Beijing
基金
中国国家社会科学基金; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Carbon neutral; Carbon sequestration; Economic and environmental benefits; Underground gas storage;
D O I
10.1016/j.energy.2022.125094
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
It is critical for China to promote the substitution of coal with natural gas (NG), and the development of carbon sequestration (CS) technology to achieve its carbon neutrality goal by 2060. Underground gas storage (UGS) employing CS technology is an important choice suitable for NG development in large scale and carbon neutral goal requirements. Unfortunately, to date China's UGS has not yet adopted CS technology. This paper focuses on the operation optimization scheme of UGS with CS technology as well as the economic benefits and carbon emission reduction effects of this technology. Firstly, a proxy model with consideration of CS is constructed to improve the operation mode of UGS, and then the operation parameters concerning the dual objective function of maximizing revenue and CS volume is optimized. Based on the range of geological parameters in China, Monte Carlo simulation is used to simulate 100,000 scenarios. The results show that by 2050 the total UGS revenue in China would reach 22.013 billion to 39.423 billion US dollars, and the total CS volume would reach 26.374 million to 54.018 million tons, approximately the total carbon emissions of China's Qinghai Province in 2018. Finally, policy recommendations are provided. © 2022
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Economic Valuation of Carbon Storage and Sequestration in Retezat National Park, Romania
    Pache, Robert-George
    Abrudan, Ioan Vasile
    Nita, Mihai-Daniel
    FORESTS, 2021, 12 (01): : 1 - 14
  • [22] Common Features of Carbon Dioxide and Underground Gas Storage (1)
    Pusch, G.
    Ionescu, G. F.
    May, F.
    Voigtlaender, G.
    Stecken, L.
    Vosteen, H. -D.
    OIL GAS-EUROPEAN MAGAZINE, 2010, 36 (03): : 131 - 137
  • [23] Common Features of Carbon Dioxide and Underground Gas Storage (2)
    Pusch, G.
    May, F.
    Bernstone, C.
    Hoellwart, J.
    Lillie, J.
    Mundhenk, N.
    Wendel, H.
    OIL GAS-EUROPEAN MAGAZINE, 2010, 36 (04): : 200 - 206
  • [24] Selection of Suitable Organic Amendments to Balance Agricultural Economic Benefits and Carbon Sequestration
    Cao, Hui
    Liu, Junming
    Ma, Shoutian
    Wu, Xiaolei
    Fu, Yuanyuan
    Gao, Yang
    PLANTS-BASEL, 2024, 13 (17):
  • [25] The economic benefits of carbon capture and sequestration R&D under uncertainty
    Beecy, D
    Kuuskraa, V
    Dipietro, P
    GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES, 2001, : 961 - 966
  • [26] Carbon dioxide sequestration in mortars with excavated soil: Engineering performances and environmental benefits
    Dwivedi, Ashutosh
    Gupta, Souradeep
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 917
  • [27] Comparison of nitrogen and carbon dioxide as cushion gas for underground gas storage reservoir
    Kim, Joohyung
    Choi, Jinsuk
    Park, Kanghee
    GEOSYSTEM ENGINEERING, 2015, 18 (03) : 163 - 167
  • [28] ECONOMIC EFFICIENCY OF USING INNOVATION TECHNOLOGIES IN UNDERGROUND GAS STORAGE FACILITIES
    Elizarova, G. S.
    JOURNAL OF MINING INSTITUTE, 2012, 196 : 169 - 171
  • [29] Microalgae biofilm carbon and nitrogen sequestration as a tool for economic and environmental sustainability
    Ugya, Adamu Yunusa
    Chen, Hui
    Wang, Qiang
    CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 53 (23) : 2055 - 2070
  • [30] Economic value of underground natural gas storage for the Brazilian power sector
    Uchoa Cavalcanti Almeida, Jose Ricardo
    Fagundes De Almeida, Edmar Luiz
    Torres, Ednildo Andrade
    Mendonca Freires, Francisco Gaudencio
    ENERGY POLICY, 2018, 121 : 488 - 497