Common Features of Carbon Dioxide and Underground Gas Storage (1)

被引:0
|
作者
Pusch, G. [1 ]
Ionescu, G. F. [4 ]
May, F. [2 ]
Voigtlaender, G.
Stecken, L.
Vosteen, H. -D. [3 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Clausthal, Inst Petr Engn, Clausthal Zellerfeld, Germany
[2] BGR, Hannover, Germany
[3] LBEG, Hannover, Germany
[4] Tech Univ Clausthal, Dept Reservoir Engn, Reservoir Simulat Grp, Clausthal Zellerfeld, Germany
来源
OIL GAS-EUROPEAN MAGAZINE | 2010年 / 36卷 / 03期
关键词
EQUATION-OF-STATE; MIXTURES;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Underground gas storage and CO, storage in depleted gas reservoirs have many common technical, reservoir mechanic and operative features, but the media involved, HC gases and CO2, are physically and chemically different. CO2 dissolved in water forms a corrosive acid, which can react with mineral compounds oldie storage and cap rock and may change the hydraulic properties in different ways. Depending on the original rock composition, carbonate, feldspar and chlorite cements may be corroded and dolomite can be precipitated. Clay or shale reservoir intercalations may become more permeable for gas. However these changes will likely not happen near the injection wells but far away because of residence time and water saturation needed for the reactions. Favorable physical properties of CO, (density, viscosity, compressibility,) will contribute in enhancing the rest gas recovery (EGR) in depleted reservoirs. The EGR capacity is limited by the termination of HC production after CO, breakthrough. Some 3 to 10% of the IGIP may be recovered additionally to the natural depletion yield. Anticline trap types with steep flanks are favourable compared to flat stratigraphic traps. High production rates accelerate the EGR. Primary injection until the reservoir pressure is raised to a medium level followed by the EGR phase is unfavorable compared with simultaneous injection/production from the beginning.
引用
收藏
页码:131 / 137
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Common Features of Carbon Dioxide and Underground Gas Storage (2)
    Pusch, G.
    May, F.
    Bernstone, C.
    Hoellwart, J.
    Lillie, J.
    Mundhenk, N.
    Wendel, H.
    OIL GAS-EUROPEAN MAGAZINE, 2010, 36 (04): : 200 - 206
  • [2] Influence of carbon dioxide on underground gas storage
    1600, Deutsche Wissens. Gesell. fur Erdoel, Erdgas und Kohle EV (754):
  • [3] Comparison of nitrogen and carbon dioxide as cushion gas for underground gas storage reservoir
    Kim, Joohyung
    Choi, Jinsuk
    Park, Kanghee
    GEOSYSTEM ENGINEERING, 2015, 18 (03) : 163 - 167
  • [4] Carbon-dioxide-storage in the underground
    Schilling, Frank
    Wuerdemann, Hilke
    GAIA-ECOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVES FOR SCIENCE AND SOCIETY, 2007, 16 (03): : 238 - 240
  • [5] Numerical Simulation Study on Underground Gas Storage with Cushion Gas Partially Replaced with Carbon Dioxide
    Kowalski, Jan
    Klimkowski, Lukasz
    Nagy, Stanislaw
    ENERGIES, 2023, 16 (14)
  • [6] UNDERGROUND-STORAGE OF CARBON-DIOXIDE
    HENDRIKS, CA
    BLOK, K
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 1993, 34 (9-11) : 949 - 957
  • [7] Underground carbon dioxide storage in saline formations
    Garcia, S.
    Kaminska, A.
    Maroto-Valer, M. Mercedes
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERS-WASTE AND RESOURCE MANAGEMENT, 2010, 163 (02) : 77 - 88
  • [8] Costs of carbon dioxide removal by underground storage
    Hendriks, CA
    Wildenborg, AFB
    Blok, K
    Floris, F
    Van Wees, JD
    GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES, 2001, : 967 - 972
  • [9] 4 sequestration - The underground storage of carbon dioxide
    Holloway, S.
    CLIMATE CHANGE AND ENERGY PATHWAYS FOR THE MEDITERRANEAN, WORKSHOP PROCEEDINGS, 2008, 15 : 61 - 88
  • [10] UNDERGROUND-STORAGE OF CARBON-DIOXIDE
    HENDRIKS, CA
    BLOK, K
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 1995, 36 (6-9) : 539 - 542