Multi-Objective Personalization in Multi-Stakeholder Organizational Bulk E-mail

被引:3
|
作者
Kong R. [1 ]
Zhang C.C. [1 ]
Sun R. [1 ]
Chhabra V. [1 ]
Nadimpalli T. [1 ]
Konstan J.A. [1 ]
机构
[1] University of Minnesota, Minneapolis
来源
关键词
email; field experiment; organizational communication; personalization;
D O I
10.1145/3555641
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Bulk email is often used in organizations to communicate "important-to-organization'' messages such as policy changes, organizational plans, and administrative updates. However, normal employees may prefer messages more relevant to their jobs or interests. Organizations face the challenge of balancing prioritizing the messages they prefer employees to know (tactical goals) while maintaining employees' positive experiences with these bulk emails, then they continue to read these emails in the future (strategic goals). Could personalization help organizations achieve these tactical and strategic goals? In an 8-week field experiment with a university newsletter, we implemented a 4x5x5 factorial design on personalizing subject lines, top news, and message order based on both the employees' and the organization's preferences. We measured these designs' influences on the open/interest/recognition/read-in-detail rate of the whole newsletter and the single messages within it. We found that ''important-to-organization'' messages only got higher recognition rates when being put on subject lines / top news (tactical goal). Mixing them with employee-preferred messages in top news did not bring further improvement to their own recognition rates but could improve the whole newsletter's recognition rate. Only when the top news solely contained the employee-preferred messages were the employees slightly more interested in the newsletter (strategic goal). We further analyze on which topics the employees and the organization's preferences conflicted. Finally, we discuss the design suggestions for organizational bulk email. © 2022 ACM.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Multi-stakeholder multi-objective greenhouse design optimization
    Min, Xinyuan
    Sok, Jaap
    de Zwart, Feije
    Lansink, Alfons Oude
    AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2024, 215
  • [2] Utility-Based Multi-Stakeholder Recommendations By Multi-Objective Optimization
    Zheng, Yong
    Pu, Aviana
    2018 IEEE/WIC/ACM INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON WEB INTELLIGENCE (WI 2018), 2018, : 128 - 135
  • [3] Value modelling for multi-stakeholder and multi-objective optimisation in engineering design
    Papageorgiou, Evangelos
    Eres, Murat Hakki
    Scanlan, James
    JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING DESIGN, 2016, 27 (10) : 697 - 724
  • [4] A Multi-Objective Optimization Framework for Multi-Stakeholder Fairness-Aware Recommendation
    Wu, Haolun
    Ma, Chen
    Mitra, Bhaskar
    Diaz, Fernando
    Liu, Xue
    ACM TRANSACTIONS ON INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2023, 41 (02)
  • [5] An Ethical Multi-Stakeholder Recommender System Based on Evolutionary Multi-Objective Optimization
    Kermany, Naime Ranjbar
    Zhao, Weiliang
    Yang, Jian
    Wu, Jia
    Pizzato, Luiz
    2020 IEEE 13TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SERVICES COMPUTING (SCC 2020), 2020, : 478 - 480
  • [6] Multi-objective airport slot scheduling incorporating operational delays and multi-stakeholder preferences
    Katsigiannis, Fotios A.
    Zografos, Konstantinos G.
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART C-EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES, 2023, 152
  • [7] Risk-Aware Multi-stakeholder Next Release Planning Using Multi-objective Optimization
    Pitangueira, Antonio Mauricio
    Tonella, Paolo
    Susi, Angelo
    Maciel, Rita Suzana
    Barros, Marcio
    REQUIREMENTS ENGINEERING: FOUNDATION FOR SOFTWARE QUALITY, REFSQ 2016, 2016, 9619 : 3 - 18
  • [8] Multi-stakeholder recommendations system with deep learning-based diversity personalization and multi-objective optimization for establishing trade-off among competing preferences
    Shrivastava, Rahul
    Sisodia, Dilip Singh
    Nagwani, Naresh Kumar
    KYBERNETES, 2024,
  • [9] INTELLIGENT E-MAIL PERSONALIZATION SYSTEM
    Hariharan, Shanmugasundaram
    JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 6 (01): : 50 - 60
  • [10] Multi-stakeholder engagement
    Blenkus, M. Gabrijelcic
    Kronegger, L.
    Pushkarev, N.
    Robnik, M.
    Sotlar, I.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 30