Multi-Objective Personalization in Multi-Stakeholder Organizational Bulk E-mail

被引:3
|
作者
Kong R. [1 ]
Zhang C.C. [1 ]
Sun R. [1 ]
Chhabra V. [1 ]
Nadimpalli T. [1 ]
Konstan J.A. [1 ]
机构
[1] University of Minnesota, Minneapolis
来源
关键词
email; field experiment; organizational communication; personalization;
D O I
10.1145/3555641
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Bulk email is often used in organizations to communicate "important-to-organization'' messages such as policy changes, organizational plans, and administrative updates. However, normal employees may prefer messages more relevant to their jobs or interests. Organizations face the challenge of balancing prioritizing the messages they prefer employees to know (tactical goals) while maintaining employees' positive experiences with these bulk emails, then they continue to read these emails in the future (strategic goals). Could personalization help organizations achieve these tactical and strategic goals? In an 8-week field experiment with a university newsletter, we implemented a 4x5x5 factorial design on personalizing subject lines, top news, and message order based on both the employees' and the organization's preferences. We measured these designs' influences on the open/interest/recognition/read-in-detail rate of the whole newsletter and the single messages within it. We found that ''important-to-organization'' messages only got higher recognition rates when being put on subject lines / top news (tactical goal). Mixing them with employee-preferred messages in top news did not bring further improvement to their own recognition rates but could improve the whole newsletter's recognition rate. Only when the top news solely contained the employee-preferred messages were the employees slightly more interested in the newsletter (strategic goal). We further analyze on which topics the employees and the organization's preferences conflicted. Finally, we discuss the design suggestions for organizational bulk email. © 2022 ACM.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Environmental capability development in a multi-stakeholder network setting: Dynamic learning through multi-stakeholder interactions
    Baranova, Polina
    BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 31 (07) : 3406 - 3420
  • [22] Multi-Organizational Multi-Stakeholder Collaboration Systems: An Exploratory Research Study of Design Concerns in Healthcare
    Gao, Fangjian
    Briggs, Robert O.
    Thiebes, Scott
    Sunyaev, Ali
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 52ND ANNUAL HAWAII INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2019, : 512 - 521
  • [23] Organizational learning, organizational resilience and the mediating role of multi-stakeholder networks A study of Egyptian academics
    Mousa, Mohamed
    Abdelgaffar, Hala A.
    Chaouali, Walid
    Aboramadan, Mohammed
    JOURNAL OF WORKPLACE LEARNING, 2020, 32 (03) : 161 - 181
  • [24] In the Eye of the beholder: a multi-stakeholder perspective of organizational citizenship and counterproductive work behaviors
    Reynolds, Clair A.
    Shoss, Mindy K.
    Jundt, Dustin K.
    HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2015, 25 (01) : 80 - 93
  • [25] Intraorganizational Bargaining in Multi-Stakeholder Initiatives
    Cutcher-Gershenfeld, Joel
    NEGOTIATION JOURNAL, 2015, 31 (04) : 393 - 400
  • [26] Governing Nanotechnology in a Multi-Stakeholder World
    Ineke Malsch
    NanoEthics, 2013, 7 : 161 - 172
  • [27] Poster: Towards Multi-Stakeholder Clouds
    Borysei, Bohdan
    Saroiu, Stefan
    de Lara, Eyal
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2024 THE 25TH INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON MOBILE COMPUTING SYSTEMS AND APPLICATIONS, HOTMOBILE 2024, 2024, : 146 - 146
  • [28] Multi-stakeholder marketing: mapping the field
    Civera, Chiara
    Casalegno, Cecilia
    Morelli, Brigida
    Chiaudano, Valentina
    REVIEW OF MANAGERIAL SCIENCE, 2025,
  • [29] Governing Nanotechnology in a Multi-Stakeholder World
    Malsch, Ineke
    NANOETHICS, 2013, 7 (02) : 161 - 172
  • [30] Multi-stakeholder microgrids for resilience and sustainability
    Bird, Stephen
    Hotaling, Chelsea
    ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARDS-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2017, 16 (02): : 116 - 132