Value modelling for multi-stakeholder and multi-objective optimisation in engineering design

被引:18
|
作者
Papageorgiou, Evangelos [1 ]
Eres, Murat Hakki [1 ]
Scanlan, James [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southampton, Fac Engn & Environm, Computat Engn & Design Res Grp, Southampton, Hants, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA); analytic hierarchy process (AHP); multi-attribute utility theory (MAUT); Nash equilibrium; Nash bargaining solution (NBS); GAME-THEORY; DECISION-MAKING; BANDWIDTH ALLOCATION; AGGREGATION; PREFERENCES; SELECTION; RANKING; WEIGHTS; MAUT; AHP;
D O I
10.1080/09544828.2016.1214693
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The work presented culminates in the development of a value model used in the conceptual phase of engineering design, with the preferences of more than one stakeholder addressed in the multi-stakeholder and multi-objective optimisation. The value' of proposed solutions is assessed in an objective way from both performance and economic perspectives, while the optimal solution is identified based on the needs of the user and manufacturer, as major stakeholders. This novel value model for consistent value assessment synthesises the multi-attribute value/utility analysis with Game Theory and Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) assessment methodologies. During the multi-criteria decision analysis, the deficiencies, introduced by the arbitrary numerical scales used in the AHP to convert the linguistic preferences of the user between the various attributes to numerical values, are resolved. The preferences of a group of experts/decision-makers are synthesised in the group value model through the extraction of weighting factors from the individuals' AHP pairwise comparison matrices. Moreover, Game Theory is used in a hybrid cooperative/bargaining, non-cooperative non-zero sum game between the stakeholders as players, identifying the optimal design through the simultaneous employment of the Nash bargaining solution and the Nash equilibrium.
引用
收藏
页码:697 / 724
页数:28
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Multi-stakeholder multi-objective greenhouse design optimization
    Min, Xinyuan
    Sok, Jaap
    de Zwart, Feije
    Lansink, Alfons Oude
    AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2024, 215
  • [2] Modelling preferences in multi-objective engineering design
    Sanchis, Javier
    Martinez, Miguel A.
    Blasco, Xavier
    Reynoso-Meza, Gilberto
    ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2010, 23 (08) : 1255 - 1264
  • [3] Utility-Based Multi-Stakeholder Recommendations By Multi-Objective Optimization
    Zheng, Yong
    Pu, Aviana
    2018 IEEE/WIC/ACM INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON WEB INTELLIGENCE (WI 2018), 2018, : 128 - 135
  • [4] A Multi-Objective Optimization Framework for Multi-Stakeholder Fairness-Aware Recommendation
    Wu, Haolun
    Ma, Chen
    Mitra, Bhaskar
    Diaz, Fernando
    Liu, Xue
    ACM TRANSACTIONS ON INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2023, 41 (02)
  • [5] An Ethical Multi-Stakeholder Recommender System Based on Evolutionary Multi-Objective Optimization
    Kermany, Naime Ranjbar
    Zhao, Weiliang
    Yang, Jian
    Wu, Jia
    Pizzato, Luiz
    2020 IEEE 13TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SERVICES COMPUTING (SCC 2020), 2020, : 478 - 480
  • [6] Multi-Objective Personalization in Multi-Stakeholder Organizational Bulk E-mail
    Kong R.
    Zhang C.C.
    Sun R.
    Chhabra V.
    Nadimpalli T.
    Konstan J.A.
    Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 2022, 6 (CSCW2):
  • [7] Lens design as multi-objective optimisation
    Joseph, Shaine
    Kang, Hyung W.
    Chakraborty, Uday K.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUTOMATION AND CONTROL, 2011, 5 (03) : 189 - 218
  • [8] Multi-objective airport slot scheduling incorporating operational delays and multi-stakeholder preferences
    Katsigiannis, Fotios A.
    Zografos, Konstantinos G.
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART C-EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES, 2023, 152
  • [9] Multi-objective optimisation
    Bortfeld, T.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2007, 84 : S72 - S73
  • [10] Grid services for multi-objective design optimisation
    Goteng, G.
    Tiwari, A.
    Roy, R.
    CIRP JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 3 (04) : 249 - 261