Speech Quality Perception in Unilateral Cochlear Implant Users With Single-Sided Deafness

被引:0
|
作者
Kelly, Scott [1 ]
Kuhlmey, Megan E. [1 ]
Despotidis, Meghan A. [1 ]
Alter, Isaac L. [1 ]
Hwa, Tiffany P. [2 ]
Chern, Alexander [3 ]
Lalwani, Anil K. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, Vagelos Coll Phys & Surg, New York Presbyterian, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg,Irving Med Ctr, 180 Ft Washington Ave,HP8, New York, NY 10032 USA
[2] Univ Penn, Perelman Sch Med, Dept Otorhinolaryngol, Philadelphia, PA USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Baltimore, MD USA
[4] Columbia Univ, Dept Mech Engn, New York, NY 10032 USA
关键词
cochlear implant; CSQI; hearing loss; single-sided deafness; speech quality perception; MUSIC PERCEPTION; 2; EARS; IDENTIFICATION; RECOGNITION; VALIDATION; ABILITIES; FREQUENCY; APPRAISAL; PROSODY; FUSION;
D O I
10.1002/ohn.941
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Objective. Cochlear implant (CI) users frequently complain about speech quality perception (SQP). In patients undergoing cochlear implantation for single-sided deafness, there is concern that poor SQP from the implanted ear will negatively impact binaural (CI + normal hearing [NH]) SQP. In this study, we investigate if binaural SQP is measurably different than unimplanted NH alone. Study Design. Cross-sectional study. Setting. Tertiary care center. Methods. Fifteen unilateral CI users with NH in the contralateral ear completed the validated Columbia Speech Quality Instrument. This instrument consists of 9 audio clips rated across 14 specific speech qualities using a 10-point visual analog scale. SQP was assessed in 3 conditions: CI only, NH only, and CI + NH. Results. Median speech quality scores were worse in the CI only condition compared to the NH only (50.0 vs 72.6, P = .0003) and binaural (50.0 vs 71.0, P = .007) conditions. Median speech quality scores were not significantly different between the NH only and binaural conditions (72.6 vs 71, P = .8). Compared to NH, CI speech quality sounded less clear, less natural, and more mechanical. Conclusion. Compared to NH, SQP is poorer with a CI alone. However, in contrast to expectation, there is no significant difference between NH and binaural SQP. This suggests poorer CI speech perception does not negatively impact binaural SQP in patients undergoing cochlear implantation for single-sided deafness.
引用
收藏
页码:224 / 232
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Influence of cochlear coverage on speech perception in single sided deafness, bimodal, and bilateral implanted cochlear implant patients
    Spiegel, Jennifer L.
    Mueller, Joachim
    Boehnlein, Rebecca
    Hempel, John-Martin
    Spiro, Judith E.
    Weiss, Bernhard G.
    Bertlich, Mattis
    Canis, Martin
    Rader, Tobias
    EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY, 2024, : 1853 - 1863
  • [32] Effects of insertion depth on spatial speech perception in noise for simulations of cochlear implants and single-sided deafness
    Zhou, Xiaoqing
    Li, Huajun
    Galvin, John J., III
    Fu, Qian-Jie
    Yuan, Wei
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 2017, 56 : S41 - S48
  • [33] Speech Perception Performance Growth and Benchmark Score Achievement After Cochlear Implantation for Single-Sided Deafness
    Nassiri, Ashley M.
    Wallerius, Katherine P.
    Lohse, Christine M.
    Marinelli, John P.
    Saoji, Aniket A.
    Driscoll, Colin L. W.
    Neff, Brian A.
    Carlson, Matthew L.
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2022, 43 (01) : E64 - E71
  • [34] Factors Predictive of Binaural Hearing Restoration by Cochlear Implant in Single-Sided Deafness
    Gersdorff, Guillaume
    Pean, Vincent
    Camby, Severine
    Barriat, Sebastien
    Lefebvre, Philippe P.
    AUDIOLOGY AND NEUROTOLOGY, 2024, 29 (03) : 228 - 238
  • [35] The sound sensation of a pure tone in cochlear implant recipients with single-sided deafness
    Marozeau, Jeremy
    Gnansia, Dan
    Ardoint, Marine
    Poncet-Wallet, Christine
    Lazard, Diane S.
    PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (07):
  • [36] Data Logging Evidence of Cochlear Implant Use in Single-Sided and Bilateral Deafness
    Rauch, Ann-Kathrin
    Kagermann, Stephanie
    Wesarg, Thomas
    Jakob, Till Fabian
    Aschendorff, Antje
    Ihorst, G.
    Speck, Iva
    Arndt, Susan
    AUDIOLOGY AND NEURO-OTOLOGY, 2019, 24 (04) : 206 - 216
  • [37] Pitch Matching in Cochlear Implant Users With Single-Sided Deafness: Effects of Electrode Position and Acoustic Stimulus Type
    Adel, Youssef
    Nagel, Sharon
    Weissgerber, Tobias
    Baumann, Uwe
    Macherey, Olivier
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE, 2019, 13
  • [38] Using aided cortical assessment as an objective tool to evaluate cochlear implant fitting in users with single-sided deafness
    Tavora-Vieira, Dayse
    Wedekind, Andre
    Marino, Roberta
    Purdy, Suzanne C.
    Rajan, Gunesh P.
    PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (02):
  • [39] Sound localisation of low- and high-frequency sounds in cochlear implant users with single-sided deafness
    Seebacher, J.
    Franke-Trieger, A.
    Weichbold, V
    Galvan, O.
    Schmutzhard, J.
    Zorowka, P.
    Stephan, K.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 2023, 62 (01) : 71 - 78
  • [40] Cochlear implant treatment of patients with single-sided deafness or asymmetric hearing loss
    Arndt, S.
    Laszig, R.
    Aschendorff, A.
    Hassepass, F.
    Beck, R.
    Wesarg, T.
    HNO, 2017, 65 : 98 - 108