Life cycle assessment of an industrial-scale petrochemical wastewater treatment plant

被引:1
|
作者
Muhaba, Sitra [1 ]
Darun, Mohd Ridzuan [1 ,3 ]
Oumer, A. N. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Malaysia Pahang Al Sultan Abdullah, Fac Ind Management, Pekan, Malaysia
[2] Herriot Watt Univ Dubai, Sch Engn & Phys Sci, Dept Mech Engn, Dubai, U Arab Emirates
[3] IPU New Zealand, Palmerston North, New Zealand
关键词
Wastewater treatment; LCA; Anaerobic digestion; Environmental impact; BAFFLED REACTOR; EMISSIONS; REDUCTION; HYDROGEN; IMPACTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.143673
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Petrochemical industries produce a huge amount of wastewater during the production of various petrochemical products. The generated wastewater must be properly treated before being released into the environment because it contains harmful chemical compounds that affect human health, the aquatic ecosystem, and the environment. However, studies on the lifecycle assessment of petrochemical wastewater treatment processes on energy recovery are rare. This paper aims to evaluate the environmental impact of an industrial-scale petrochemical wastewater treatment plant (PWWTP) in the Malaysian state of Pahang using a life cycle assessment (LCA) method. The goal of this LCA study was to assess the environmental benefits and drawbacks of an existing treatment plant where greenhouse gas emissions are released directly into the air. In addition, the environmental impacts of the existing treatment plant were compared with those observed in an ideal case in which the methane gas is reused as an energy source. The 2001 version of the Center of Environmental Science-Leiden University (CML2001) impact assessment method was employed using GaBi 9 software, which entailed the analysis of the operational, sludge landfilling, and sludge transportation phases of the treatment process. Among the inventory components, the wastewater (direct emission) showed the highest eutrophication potential (EP) and global warming potential (GWP) in both the actual and hypothetical cases. In contrast, the electricity generation inventory component caused an increased acidification potential (AP) in the case of the existing treatment plant. Most of the global warming potential impact from the treatment results from the anaerobic digestion process. Other indirect global warming potential impacts from the chemical consumption (34.7 kg CO2-eq) and solid sludge transport (13.7 kg CO2-eq) are minimal compared to the treatment and electricity consumption impacts. The second most relevant source of the environmental impact of the treatment plant is electricity generation, which has impacted many categories. Acidification potential (89.2%), fossil abiotic depletion (59.4%), marine ecotoxicity (52%), human toxicity (45%), photochemical ozone depletion, and global warming (15%) are the main impact categories that significantly contributed by electricity consumption by the plant. Simple integration of the anaerobic digestion in the secondary treatment stage with the energy recovery unit reduced the total environmental impact by 30%. The results demonstrate that the least environmental impact was registered for the case where the methane gas produced from the anaerobic digestion is reused, indicating that the use of clean energy can reduce both the overall environmental burden and the treatment plant's operational costs.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Environmental impact assessment of southern tehran wastewater treatment plant using life cycle assessment (LCA)
    Samsami, Zeinab
    Jafari, Ahmad Jonidi
    Delnavaz, Mohammad
    Naderi, Azra
    Rashvanlou, Reza Barati
    Inchehboroun, Behnam Movassagh
    Dehghanifard, Emad
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2025, 15 (01):
  • [42] Assessment of integration options of hybrid biological reactor in a petrochemical wastewater treatment plant
    Ahmed, M. Emuntasir
    Al-Yaseen, R.
    Mydlarczyk, A.
    Al-Haddad, A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 19 (07) : 6141 - 6150
  • [43] Assessment of integration options of hybrid biological reactor in a petrochemical wastewater treatment plant
    M. Emuntasir Ahmed
    R. Al-Yaseen
    A. Mydlarczyk
    A. Al-Haddad
    International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 2022, 19 : 6141 - 6150
  • [44] Comparative evaluation of different operation scenarios for a full-scale wastewater treatment plant: Modeling coupled with life cycle assessment
    Daskiran, Filiz
    Gulhan, Hazal
    Guven, Huseyin
    Ozgun, Hale
    Ersahin, Mustafa Evren
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2022, 341
  • [45] Comparative life cycle assessment of sequential chemical and electrochemical processes for the treatment of industrial textile wastewater
    Salazar-Sogamoso, Luis Miguel
    Gomez-Garcia, Miguel-Angel
    Dobrosz-Gomez, Izabela
    JOURNAL OF SOLID STATE ELECTROCHEMISTRY, 2024,
  • [46] Industrial-Scale Technology for Molybdic Acid Production from Waste Petrochemical Catalysts
    Leszczynska-Sejda, Katarzyna
    Dydo, Piotr
    Szydlowska-Braszak, Ewa
    MATERIALS, 2023, 16 (17)
  • [47] An environmental and economic assessment based on life cycle approaches for industrial wastewater treatment and water recovery
    Capa, Seda
    Ozdemir, Alp
    Gunkaya, Zerrin
    Ozkan, Aysun
    Banar, Mufide
    JOURNAL OF WATER PROCESS ENGINEERING, 2022, 49
  • [48] Life Cycle Assessment of Wastewater Treatment Plants in Ireland
    McNamara, Greg
    Fitzsimons, Lorna
    Horrigan, Matthew
    Phelan, Thomas
    Delaure, Yan
    Corcoran, Brian
    Doherty, Edelle
    Clifford, Eoghan
    JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OF ENERGY WATER AND ENVIRONMENT SYSTEMS-JSDEWES, 2016, 4 (03): : 216 - 233
  • [49] Assessment of wastewater treatment technologies: life cycle approach
    Kalbar, Pradip P.
    Karmakar, Subhankar
    Asolekar, Shyam R.
    WATER AND ENVIRONMENT JOURNAL, 2013, 27 (02) : 261 - 268
  • [50] Laundry Wastewater Treatment: Review and Life Cycle Assessment
    Santiago, Dunia E.
    Hernández Rodríguez, M.J.
    Pulido-Melián, E.
    Journal of Environmental Engineering (United States), 2021, 147 (10):