Life cycle assessment of an industrial-scale petrochemical wastewater treatment plant

被引:1
|
作者
Muhaba, Sitra [1 ]
Darun, Mohd Ridzuan [1 ,3 ]
Oumer, A. N. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Malaysia Pahang Al Sultan Abdullah, Fac Ind Management, Pekan, Malaysia
[2] Herriot Watt Univ Dubai, Sch Engn & Phys Sci, Dept Mech Engn, Dubai, U Arab Emirates
[3] IPU New Zealand, Palmerston North, New Zealand
关键词
Wastewater treatment; LCA; Anaerobic digestion; Environmental impact; BAFFLED REACTOR; EMISSIONS; REDUCTION; HYDROGEN; IMPACTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.143673
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Petrochemical industries produce a huge amount of wastewater during the production of various petrochemical products. The generated wastewater must be properly treated before being released into the environment because it contains harmful chemical compounds that affect human health, the aquatic ecosystem, and the environment. However, studies on the lifecycle assessment of petrochemical wastewater treatment processes on energy recovery are rare. This paper aims to evaluate the environmental impact of an industrial-scale petrochemical wastewater treatment plant (PWWTP) in the Malaysian state of Pahang using a life cycle assessment (LCA) method. The goal of this LCA study was to assess the environmental benefits and drawbacks of an existing treatment plant where greenhouse gas emissions are released directly into the air. In addition, the environmental impacts of the existing treatment plant were compared with those observed in an ideal case in which the methane gas is reused as an energy source. The 2001 version of the Center of Environmental Science-Leiden University (CML2001) impact assessment method was employed using GaBi 9 software, which entailed the analysis of the operational, sludge landfilling, and sludge transportation phases of the treatment process. Among the inventory components, the wastewater (direct emission) showed the highest eutrophication potential (EP) and global warming potential (GWP) in both the actual and hypothetical cases. In contrast, the electricity generation inventory component caused an increased acidification potential (AP) in the case of the existing treatment plant. Most of the global warming potential impact from the treatment results from the anaerobic digestion process. Other indirect global warming potential impacts from the chemical consumption (34.7 kg CO2-eq) and solid sludge transport (13.7 kg CO2-eq) are minimal compared to the treatment and electricity consumption impacts. The second most relevant source of the environmental impact of the treatment plant is electricity generation, which has impacted many categories. Acidification potential (89.2%), fossil abiotic depletion (59.4%), marine ecotoxicity (52%), human toxicity (45%), photochemical ozone depletion, and global warming (15%) are the main impact categories that significantly contributed by electricity consumption by the plant. Simple integration of the anaerobic digestion in the secondary treatment stage with the energy recovery unit reduced the total environmental impact by 30%. The results demonstrate that the least environmental impact was registered for the case where the methane gas produced from the anaerobic digestion is reused, indicating that the use of clean energy can reduce both the overall environmental burden and the treatment plant's operational costs.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Life cycle assessment of industry wastewater treatment plant: a case study in Vietnam
    Tran, Hung Van
    Phan, Hao Anh
    Bui, Ha Manh
    RSC SUSTAINABILITY, 2025, 3 (03): : 1415 - 1423
  • [22] Life Cycle Assessment of a Wastewater Treatment Plant Focused on Material and Energy Flows
    Jian-Guang Wu
    Xiang-Yu Meng
    Xiao-Meng Liu
    Xian-Wei Liu
    Zhi-Xia Zheng
    De-Qian Xu
    Guo-Ping Sheng
    Han-Qing Yu
    Environmental Management, 2010, 46 : 610 - 617
  • [23] Life Cycle Assessment of a Wastewater Treatment Plant Focused on Material and Energy Flows
    Wu, Jian-Guang
    Meng, Xiang-Yu
    Liu, Xiao-Meng
    Liu, Xian-Wei
    Zheng, Zhi-Xia
    Xu, De-Qian
    Sheng, Guo-Ping
    Yu, Han-Qing
    ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2010, 46 (04) : 610 - 617
  • [24] ASSESSMENT OF AERATED BIOFILTRATION AT INDUSTRIAL-SCALE
    KLEIBER, B
    ROUDON, G
    BIGOT, B
    SIBONY, J
    WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1994, 29 (10-11) : 197 - 208
  • [25] Life cycle assessment of industrial wastewater treatment: Evaluating the environmental impact of electrocoagulation technologies
    Sedaghat, Omid
    Bahramifar, Nader
    Nowrouzi, Mohsen
    Younesi, Habibollah
    JOURNAL OF WATER PROCESS ENGINEERING, 2025, 71
  • [26] Life Cycle Assessment of Urban Wastewater Treatment
    Wang Mei
    Yang Ming
    Liu Jun
    Li Jian-fen
    Energy Engineering and Environment Engineering, 2014, 535 : 346 - 349
  • [27] Life cycle assessment in wastewater treatment technology
    Parra-Saldivar, Roberto
    Bilal, Muhammad
    Iqbal, Hafiz M. N.
    CURRENT OPINION IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & HEALTH, 2020, 13 : 80 - 84
  • [28] Life cycle assessment of an industrial water recycling plant
    Pillay, SD
    Friedrich, E
    Buckley, CA
    WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2002, 46 (09) : 55 - 62
  • [29] Life cycle assessment of introducing an anaerobic digester in a municipal wastewater treatment plant in Spain
    Blanco, David
    Collado, Sergio
    Laca, Adriana
    Diaz, Mario
    WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 73 (04) : 835 - 842
  • [30] Influence of data collection schemes on the Life Cycle Assessment of a municipal wastewater treatment plant
    Yoshida, Hiroko
    Clavreul, Julie
    Scheutz, Charlotte
    Christensen, Thomas H.
    WATER RESEARCH, 2014, 56 : 292 - 303