Life cycle assessment of an industrial-scale petrochemical wastewater treatment plant

被引:1
|
作者
Muhaba, Sitra [1 ]
Darun, Mohd Ridzuan [1 ,3 ]
Oumer, A. N. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Malaysia Pahang Al Sultan Abdullah, Fac Ind Management, Pekan, Malaysia
[2] Herriot Watt Univ Dubai, Sch Engn & Phys Sci, Dept Mech Engn, Dubai, U Arab Emirates
[3] IPU New Zealand, Palmerston North, New Zealand
关键词
Wastewater treatment; LCA; Anaerobic digestion; Environmental impact; BAFFLED REACTOR; EMISSIONS; REDUCTION; HYDROGEN; IMPACTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.143673
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Petrochemical industries produce a huge amount of wastewater during the production of various petrochemical products. The generated wastewater must be properly treated before being released into the environment because it contains harmful chemical compounds that affect human health, the aquatic ecosystem, and the environment. However, studies on the lifecycle assessment of petrochemical wastewater treatment processes on energy recovery are rare. This paper aims to evaluate the environmental impact of an industrial-scale petrochemical wastewater treatment plant (PWWTP) in the Malaysian state of Pahang using a life cycle assessment (LCA) method. The goal of this LCA study was to assess the environmental benefits and drawbacks of an existing treatment plant where greenhouse gas emissions are released directly into the air. In addition, the environmental impacts of the existing treatment plant were compared with those observed in an ideal case in which the methane gas is reused as an energy source. The 2001 version of the Center of Environmental Science-Leiden University (CML2001) impact assessment method was employed using GaBi 9 software, which entailed the analysis of the operational, sludge landfilling, and sludge transportation phases of the treatment process. Among the inventory components, the wastewater (direct emission) showed the highest eutrophication potential (EP) and global warming potential (GWP) in both the actual and hypothetical cases. In contrast, the electricity generation inventory component caused an increased acidification potential (AP) in the case of the existing treatment plant. Most of the global warming potential impact from the treatment results from the anaerobic digestion process. Other indirect global warming potential impacts from the chemical consumption (34.7 kg CO2-eq) and solid sludge transport (13.7 kg CO2-eq) are minimal compared to the treatment and electricity consumption impacts. The second most relevant source of the environmental impact of the treatment plant is electricity generation, which has impacted many categories. Acidification potential (89.2%), fossil abiotic depletion (59.4%), marine ecotoxicity (52%), human toxicity (45%), photochemical ozone depletion, and global warming (15%) are the main impact categories that significantly contributed by electricity consumption by the plant. Simple integration of the anaerobic digestion in the secondary treatment stage with the energy recovery unit reduced the total environmental impact by 30%. The results demonstrate that the least environmental impact was registered for the case where the methane gas produced from the anaerobic digestion is reused, indicating that the use of clean energy can reduce both the overall environmental burden and the treatment plant's operational costs.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Microalgae production in an industrial-scale photobioreactors plant: A comprehensive Life Cycle assessment
    Gurreri, Luigi
    Rindina, Mirko Calanni
    Luciano, Antonella
    Falqui, Luciano
    Fino, Debora
    Mancini, Giuseppe
    SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY AND PHARMACY, 2024, 39
  • [2] Operation of industrial-scale electron beam wastewater treatment plant
    Han, Bumsoo
    Kim, Jin Kyu
    Kim, Yuri
    Choi, Jang Seung
    Jeong, Kwang Young
    RADIATION PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY, 2012, 81 (09) : 1475 - 1478
  • [3] Social life cycle assessment of an innovative industrial wastewater treatment plant
    Monica Serreli
    Luigia Petti
    Andrea Raggi
    Alberto Simboli
    Guglielmo Iuliano
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2021, 26 : 1878 - 1899
  • [4] Social life cycle assessment of an innovative industrial wastewater treatment plant
    Serreli, Monica
    Petti, Luigia
    Raggi, Andrea
    Simboli, Alberto
    Iuliano, Guglielmo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2021, 26 (09): : 1878 - 1899
  • [5] Life cycle assessment of an industrial-scale vanadium flow battery
    Blume, Nick
    Becker, Maik
    Turek, Thomas
    Minke, Christine
    JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2022, 26 (05) : 1796 - 1808
  • [6] Life Cycle Assessment of Industrial Wastewater Treatment Trains
    Tran, Dana
    Weidhaas, Jennifer
    ADVANCED SUSTAINABLE SYSTEMS, 2024, 8 (12):
  • [7] LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT APPLIED TO WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
    Skultetyova, Ivona
    Dubcova, Maria
    Galbova, Kristina
    Stanko, Stefan
    Holubec, Michal
    ECOLOGY, ECONOMICS, EDUCATION AND LEGISLATION CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, SGEM 2016, VOL I, 2016, : 399 - 405
  • [8] Life Cycle Assessment to Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plant
    Garcia Alarcon, Jessica Sarai
    Rodriguez Martinez, Antonio
    Herrera Orozco, Israel
    ICHEAP-10: 10TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CHEMICAL AND PROCESS ENGINEERING, PTS 1-3, 2011, 24 : 1345 - +
  • [9] Life cycle assessment of emerging coal conversion technologies in China: An industrial-scale comparison
    Yan, Yulong
    Li, Junjie
    Duan, Xiaolin
    Yang, Dong
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 271
  • [10] Life Cycle Assessment Methodology Applied to a Wastewater Treatment Plant
    Viotti, Paolo
    Tatti, Fabio
    Bongirolami, Simona
    Romano, Roberto
    Mancini, Giuseppe
    Serini, Francesca
    Azizi, Mona
    Croce, Lavinia
    WATER, 2024, 16 (08)