A Model for Predicting Clinically Significant fi cant Prostate Cancer Using Prostate MRI and Risk Factors

被引:1
|
作者
Lacson, Ronilda [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Haj-Mirzaian, Arya [1 ,2 ]
Burk, Kristine [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Glazer, Daniel I. [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Naik, Sachin [1 ,2 ]
Khorasani, Ramin [1 ,2 ,3 ,6 ]
Kibel, Adam S. [2 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Radiol, One Brigham Circle,1620 Tremont St, Boston, MA 02120 USA
[2] Harvard Med Sch, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Ctr Evidence Based Imaging, Boston, MA 02120 USA
[4] Mass Gen Brigham, Qual & Patient Safety, Boston, MA USA
[5] Brigham & Womens & Hosp, Dept Radiol, Cross Sect Intervent Radiol, Boston, MA USA
[6] Mass Gen Brigham, Radiol Qual & Safety, Boston, MA USA
[7] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Surg & Chair, Dept Urol, Boston, MA USA
基金
美国医疗保健研究与质量局;
关键词
Key Words: Prostate cancer; prostate MRI; prostate biopsy; predictive model; predictive value of testing;
D O I
10.1016/j.jacr.2024.02.035
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: The aim of this study was to develop and validate a predictive model for clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) using prostate MRI and patient risk factors. Methods: In total, 960 men who underwent MRI from 2015 to 2019 and biopsy either 6 months before or 6 months after MRI were identified. Men diagnosed with csPCa were identified, and csPCa risk was modeled using known patient factors (age, race, and prostatespecific antigen [PSA] level) and prostate MRI findings (location, Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System score, extraprostatic extension, dominant lesion size, and PSA density). csPCa was defined as Gleason score sum >= 7. Using a derivation cohort, a multivariable logistic regression model and a point-based scoring system were developed to predict csPCa. Discrimination and calibration were assessed in a separate independent validation cohort. Results: Among 960 MRI reports, 552 (57.5%) were from men diagnosed with csPCa. Using the derivation cohort (n = 632), variables that predicted csPCa were Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System scores of 4 and 5, the presence of extraprostatic extension, and elevated PSA density. Evaluation using the validation cohort (n = 328) resulted in an area under the curve of 0.77, with adequate calibration (HosmerLemeshow P = .58). At a risk threshold of >2 points, the model identified csPCa with sensitivity of 98.4% and negative predictive value of 78.6% but prevented only 4.3% potential biopsies (0-2 points; 14 of 328). At a higher threshold of >5 points, the model identified csPCa with sensitivity of 89.5% and negative predictive value of 70.1% and avoided 20.4% of biopsies (0-5 points; 67 of 328). Conclusions: The point-based model reported here can potentially identify a vast majority of men at risk for csPCa, while avoiding biopsy in about 1 in 5 men with elevated PSA levels.
引用
收藏
页码:1419 / 1427
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparison of biparametric MRI to full multiparametric MRI for detection of clinically significant prostate cancer
    Sherrer, Rachael L.
    Glaser, Zachary A.
    Gordetsky, Jennifer B.
    Nix, Jeffrey W.
    Porter, Kristin K.
    Rais-Bahrami, Soroush
    PROSTATE CANCER AND PROSTATIC DISEASES, 2019, 22 (02) : 331 - 336
  • [42] Comparison of biparametric MRI to full multiparametric MRI for detection of clinically significant prostate cancer
    Rachael L. Sherrer
    Zachary A. Glaser
    Jennifer B. Gordetsky
    Jeffrey W. Nix
    Kristin K. Porter
    Soroush Rais-Bahrami
    Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases, 2019, 22 : 331 - 336
  • [43] PREDICTION OF OVERALL AND CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT CANCER RISK ON MRI-TARGETED AND SYSTEMATIC PROSTATE BIOPSY USING PREBIOPSY NOMOGRAMS
    Bjurlin, Marc
    Wysock, James
    Sakar, Saradwata
    Venkataraman, Rajesh
    Meng, Xiaosong
    Fenstermaker, Michael
    Mendhiratta, Neil
    Fernandez, Gregory
    Rosenkrantz, Andrew
    Taneja, Samir
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 193 (04): : E1075 - E1076
  • [44] Risk of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Associated With Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Category 3 (Equivocal) Lesions Identified on Multiparametric Prostate MRI
    Sheridan, Alison D.
    Nath, Sameer K.
    Syed, Jamil S.
    Aneja, Sanjay
    Sprenkle, Preston C.
    Weinreb, Jeffrey C.
    Spektor, Michael
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2018, 210 (02) : 347 - 357
  • [45] A Dedicated Prostate MRI Teaching Course Improves the Ability of the Urologist to Interpret Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer on Multiparametric MRI
    Kasivisvanathan, Veeru
    Ambrosi, Alessandro
    Giganti, Francesco
    Chau, Edwin
    Kirkham, Alex
    Punwani, Shonit
    Allen, Clare
    Emberton, Mark
    Moore, Caroline M.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2019, 75 (01) : 203 - 204
  • [46] Fusion verses cognitive MRI-guided prostate biopsies in diagnosing clinically significant prostate cancer
    Lockhart, Kathleen
    Martin, Jarad
    White, Martin
    Raman, Avi
    Grant, Alexander
    Chong, Peter
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2022, 129 : 144 - 145
  • [47] Fusion versus cognitive MRI-guided prostate biopsies in diagnosing clinically significant prostate cancer
    Lockhart, Kathleen
    Martin, Jarad
    White, Martin
    Raman, Avi
    Grant, Alexander
    Chong, Peter
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL UROLOGY, 2024, 17 (05) : 504 - 510
  • [48] IMPACT OF PROSTATE MRI QUALITY (PI-QUAL) ON CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT PROSTATE CANCER DETECTION RATES
    Scovell, Jason M.
    Ardines, Kassandra Zaila
    Liao, Ross
    Singh, Kailash
    Abouassaly, Robert
    Weight, Christopher
    Purysko, Andrei
    Ward, Ryan
    Schwen, Zeyad
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2024, 211 (05): : E304 - E305
  • [49] Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in MRI-Negative Prostate Zones: Saturation Biopsy is Necessary
    Winyard, J. C.
    Wong, K. W. E.
    Khan, M. A. K.
    JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY, 2022, 256 : S12 - S12
  • [50] Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer by Using Abbreviated Biparametric Prostate MR Imaging
    Ueno, Yoshiko
    Tamada, Tsutomu
    Takahashi, Satoru
    RADIOLOGY, 2018, 286 (03) : 1093 - 1093