A Model for Predicting Clinically Significant fi cant Prostate Cancer Using Prostate MRI and Risk Factors

被引:1
|
作者
Lacson, Ronilda [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Haj-Mirzaian, Arya [1 ,2 ]
Burk, Kristine [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Glazer, Daniel I. [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Naik, Sachin [1 ,2 ]
Khorasani, Ramin [1 ,2 ,3 ,6 ]
Kibel, Adam S. [2 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Radiol, One Brigham Circle,1620 Tremont St, Boston, MA 02120 USA
[2] Harvard Med Sch, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Ctr Evidence Based Imaging, Boston, MA 02120 USA
[4] Mass Gen Brigham, Qual & Patient Safety, Boston, MA USA
[5] Brigham & Womens & Hosp, Dept Radiol, Cross Sect Intervent Radiol, Boston, MA USA
[6] Mass Gen Brigham, Radiol Qual & Safety, Boston, MA USA
[7] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Surg & Chair, Dept Urol, Boston, MA USA
基金
美国医疗保健研究与质量局;
关键词
Key Words: Prostate cancer; prostate MRI; prostate biopsy; predictive model; predictive value of testing;
D O I
10.1016/j.jacr.2024.02.035
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: The aim of this study was to develop and validate a predictive model for clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) using prostate MRI and patient risk factors. Methods: In total, 960 men who underwent MRI from 2015 to 2019 and biopsy either 6 months before or 6 months after MRI were identified. Men diagnosed with csPCa were identified, and csPCa risk was modeled using known patient factors (age, race, and prostatespecific antigen [PSA] level) and prostate MRI findings (location, Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System score, extraprostatic extension, dominant lesion size, and PSA density). csPCa was defined as Gleason score sum >= 7. Using a derivation cohort, a multivariable logistic regression model and a point-based scoring system were developed to predict csPCa. Discrimination and calibration were assessed in a separate independent validation cohort. Results: Among 960 MRI reports, 552 (57.5%) were from men diagnosed with csPCa. Using the derivation cohort (n = 632), variables that predicted csPCa were Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System scores of 4 and 5, the presence of extraprostatic extension, and elevated PSA density. Evaluation using the validation cohort (n = 328) resulted in an area under the curve of 0.77, with adequate calibration (HosmerLemeshow P = .58). At a risk threshold of >2 points, the model identified csPCa with sensitivity of 98.4% and negative predictive value of 78.6% but prevented only 4.3% potential biopsies (0-2 points; 14 of 328). At a higher threshold of >5 points, the model identified csPCa with sensitivity of 89.5% and negative predictive value of 70.1% and avoided 20.4% of biopsies (0-5 points; 67 of 328). Conclusions: The point-based model reported here can potentially identify a vast majority of men at risk for csPCa, while avoiding biopsy in about 1 in 5 men with elevated PSA levels.
引用
收藏
页码:1419 / 1427
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Utility of Multiparametric MRI for Predicting Residual Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer After Focal Laser Ablation
    Felker, Ely R.
    Raman, Steven S.
    Lu, David S. K.
    Tuttle, Mitch
    Margolis, Daniel J.
    ElKhoury, Fuad F.
    Sayre, James
    Marks, Leonard S.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2019, 213 (06) : 1253 - 1258
  • [32] Characterizing Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Using Template Prostate Mapping Biopsy
    Ahmed, Hashim Uddin
    Hu, Yipeng
    Carter, Tim
    Arumainayagam, Nimalan
    Lecornet, Emilie
    Freeman, Alex
    Hawkes, David
    Barratt, Dean C.
    Emberton, Mark
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2011, 186 (02): : 458 - 464
  • [33] ECHOGENICITY ENHANCES RISK ASSESSMENT OF LESIONS ON MP-MRI FOR CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT PROSTATE CANCER
    Wegner, Garret
    Khan, Amir
    Panagos, Michael
    Wang, Shu
    Van Besien, Alexa J.
    Naslund, Michael
    Siddiqui, Mohummad Minhaj
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2024, 211 (05): : E302 - E302
  • [34] Addition of MRI or DRE to clinical data and risk prediction for clinically significant prostate cancer.
    Wallis, Christopher J. D.
    Paproski, Robert J.
    Hyndman, M. Eric
    Fairey, Adrian S.
    Marks, Leonard
    Pavlovich, Christian P.
    Fletcher, Sean
    Zachoval, Roman
    Adamcova, Vanda
    Stejskal, Jiri
    Aprikian, Armen G.
    Kinnaird, Adam
    Pink, Desmond
    Vasquez, Catalina
    Beatty, Perrin H.
    Lewis, John D.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 42 (16)
  • [35] Diagnostic value of a SUVmax cutoff in predicting clinically significant prostate cancer?
    Nassour, Anthony-Joe
    Jain, Anika
    Hui, Nicholas
    Symons, James
    Woo, Henry
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2022, 29 : 20 - 20
  • [36] The predictability of multiparametric prostate MRI for clinically significant cancer - a prospective study
    Varol, C.
    Kitzing, Y.
    Raz, O.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 113 : 44 - 44
  • [37] Clinically Significant Prostate cancer at Cystoprostatectomy
    Panayi, Zoe
    Kumar, Manal
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2019, 106 : 59 - 59
  • [38] Long-Term Risk of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Biopsy-Negative Patients With Baseline Biparametric Prostate MRI
    Parhiala, Laura
    Knaapila, Juha
    Jambor, Ivan
    Verho, Janne
    Syvanen, Kari
    Aronen, Hannu
    Bostrom, Peter
    Ettala, Otto
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2024,
  • [39] DETECTION OF CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT PROSTATE CANCER ON MRI: A COMPARISON OF AN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE MODEL VERSUS RADIOLOGISTS
    Soerensen, Simon John Christoph
    Fan, Richard E.
    Bhattacharya, Indrani
    Lim, David S.
    Ahmadi, Sarir
    Li, Xinran
    Vesal, Sulaiman
    Rusu, Mirabela
    Sonn, Geoffrey A.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2023, 209 : E103 - E103
  • [40] Radiomics prediction model for the improved diagnosis o clinically significant prostate cancer on biparametric MRI
    Li, Mengjuan
    Chen, Tong
    Zhao, Wenlu
    Wei, Chaogang
    Li, Xiaobo
    Duan, Shaofeng
    Ji, Libiao
    Lu, Zhihua
    Shen, Junkang
    QUANTITATIVE IMAGING IN MEDICINE AND SURGERY, 2020, 10 (02) : 368 - +