A Model for Predicting Clinically Significant fi cant Prostate Cancer Using Prostate MRI and Risk Factors

被引:1
|
作者
Lacson, Ronilda [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Haj-Mirzaian, Arya [1 ,2 ]
Burk, Kristine [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Glazer, Daniel I. [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Naik, Sachin [1 ,2 ]
Khorasani, Ramin [1 ,2 ,3 ,6 ]
Kibel, Adam S. [2 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Radiol, One Brigham Circle,1620 Tremont St, Boston, MA 02120 USA
[2] Harvard Med Sch, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Ctr Evidence Based Imaging, Boston, MA 02120 USA
[4] Mass Gen Brigham, Qual & Patient Safety, Boston, MA USA
[5] Brigham & Womens & Hosp, Dept Radiol, Cross Sect Intervent Radiol, Boston, MA USA
[6] Mass Gen Brigham, Radiol Qual & Safety, Boston, MA USA
[7] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Surg & Chair, Dept Urol, Boston, MA USA
基金
美国医疗保健研究与质量局;
关键词
Key Words: Prostate cancer; prostate MRI; prostate biopsy; predictive model; predictive value of testing;
D O I
10.1016/j.jacr.2024.02.035
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: The aim of this study was to develop and validate a predictive model for clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) using prostate MRI and patient risk factors. Methods: In total, 960 men who underwent MRI from 2015 to 2019 and biopsy either 6 months before or 6 months after MRI were identified. Men diagnosed with csPCa were identified, and csPCa risk was modeled using known patient factors (age, race, and prostatespecific antigen [PSA] level) and prostate MRI findings (location, Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System score, extraprostatic extension, dominant lesion size, and PSA density). csPCa was defined as Gleason score sum >= 7. Using a derivation cohort, a multivariable logistic regression model and a point-based scoring system were developed to predict csPCa. Discrimination and calibration were assessed in a separate independent validation cohort. Results: Among 960 MRI reports, 552 (57.5%) were from men diagnosed with csPCa. Using the derivation cohort (n = 632), variables that predicted csPCa were Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System scores of 4 and 5, the presence of extraprostatic extension, and elevated PSA density. Evaluation using the validation cohort (n = 328) resulted in an area under the curve of 0.77, with adequate calibration (HosmerLemeshow P = .58). At a risk threshold of >2 points, the model identified csPCa with sensitivity of 98.4% and negative predictive value of 78.6% but prevented only 4.3% potential biopsies (0-2 points; 14 of 328). At a higher threshold of >5 points, the model identified csPCa with sensitivity of 89.5% and negative predictive value of 70.1% and avoided 20.4% of biopsies (0-5 points; 67 of 328). Conclusions: The point-based model reported here can potentially identify a vast majority of men at risk for csPCa, while avoiding biopsy in about 1 in 5 men with elevated PSA levels.
引用
收藏
页码:1419 / 1427
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Factors Predicting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer on PIRADS 3 lesions
    Lin, J.
    Siddiqui, M.
    Li, E.
    Aguiar, J.
    Ansbro, B.
    Soliman, M.
    Rich, J.
    Alfaro, J.
    Keeter, M.
    Schaeffer, E.
    Ross, A.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2022, 81 : S701 - S702
  • [2] FACTORS PREDICTING CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT PROSTATE CANCER IN PIRADS 4 LESIONS
    Siddiqui, Mohammad
    Lin, Jasmine
    Aguiar, Jonathan
    Ansbro, Brandon
    Soliman, Moataz
    Rich, Jordan
    Alfaro, Johan
    Keeter, Mary-Kate
    Mai, Quan
    Schaeffer, Edward
    Ross, Ashley
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2022, 207 (05): : E962 - E963
  • [3] PREDICTING CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT PROSTATE CANCER: COMBINING 4KSCORE AND MRI
    Lubin, Marc A.
    Sudhan, Hari Haran
    Weil, Rachel
    Beksac, Alp Tuna
    Tewari, Ashutosh
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 201 (04): : E218 - E218
  • [4] Development of a novel nomogram for predicting clinically significant prostate cancer with the prostate health index and multiparametric MRI
    Mo, Li-Cai
    Zhang, Xian-Jun
    Zheng, Hai-Hong
    Huang, Xiao-peng
    Zheng, Lin
    Zhou, Zhi-Rui
    Wang, Jia-Jia
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12
  • [5] Evaluating the risk of clinically significant prostate cancer in lesions detected on multiparametric MRI of the prostate.
    Molokwu, Chidi N.
    Gkikas, Christos
    Lee, Nicola
    Lesniak-Buzon, Joanna
    Ali, Faisal
    Bardgett, Harry
    CANCER PREVENTION RESEARCH, 2023, 16 (01)
  • [6] A 4K score/MRI-based nomogram for predicting prostate cancer, clinically significant prostate cancer, and unfavorable prostate cancer
    Wagaskar, Vinayak G.
    Sobotka, Stanislaw
    Ratnani, Parita
    Young, James
    Lantz, Anna
    Parekh, Sneha
    Falagario, Ugo Giovanni
    Li, Li
    Lewis, Sara
    Haines, Kenneth, III
    Punnen, Sanoj
    Wiklund, Peter
    Tewari, Ash
    CANCER REPORTS, 2021, 4 (04)
  • [7] Multiparametric MRI in the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer
    Futterer, Jurgen J.
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2017, 18 (04) : 597 - 606
  • [8] PROSTATE CANCER SCREENING NOMOGRAM PREDICTING 15-YEAR RISK OF CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT PROSTATE CANCER, DEVELOPED USING COMPETING RISK ANALYSIS
    Brooks, Michael
    Carlsson, Sigrid
    Zajichek, Alexander
    Chagin, Kevin
    Hugosson, Jonas
    Kattan, Michael
    Stephenson, Andrew
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 199 (04): : E606 - E606
  • [9] Risk of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer after a Nonsuspicious Prostate MRI-A Comparison with the General Population
    Pylvalainen, Juho
    Hoffstrom, Jaakko
    Kenttamies, Anu
    Auvinen, Anssi
    Mirtti, Tuomas
    Rannikko, Antti
    CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2024, 33 (05) : 749 - 756
  • [10] DETECTION OF CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT PROSTATE CANCER: A COMPARISON OF MULTIPARAMETRIC MRI AND PROSTATE BIOPSY
    Porpiglia, Francesco
    Fiori, Cristian
    Mele, Fabrizio
    Manfredi, Matteo
    Grande, Susanna
    Cossu, Marco
    Cattaneo, Giovanni
    Bollito, Enrico
    Papotti, Mauro
    Russo, Filippo
    Regge, Daniele
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2013, 33 (05) : 2324 - 2325