Statistical Differences in Set Analysis in Badminton at the RIO 2016 Olympic Games

被引:18
|
作者
Torres-Luque, Gema [1 ]
Ivan Fernandez-Garcia, Angel [2 ]
Carlos Blanca-Torres, Juan [1 ]
Kondric, Miran [3 ]
Cabello-Manrique, David [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Jaen, Dept Didact Mus Plast & Body Express, Jaen, Spain
[2] Univ Zaragoza, Dept Physiatry & Nursing, Zaragoza, Spain
[3] Univ Ljubljana, Fac Sport, Dept Racket Sports, Ljubljana, Slovenia
[4] Univ Granada, Dept Phys Educ & Sports, Granada, Spain
来源
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY | 2019年 / 10卷
关键词
notational analysis; match analysis; racket sports; performance indicators; performance analysis; badminton; MENS SINGLES; MATCHES; COMPETITION; PLAYERS; TENNIS;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00731
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The aim of the present study was to determine statistical differences in a set of badminton competition matches in five different modalities with regard to competition level (Group Phase vs. Eliminatory Phase). Data from 453 sets (125 in men's singles; 108 sets in women's singles; 77 sets in men's doubles; 73 in women's doubles and 70 in mixed doubles) from the RIO 2016 Olympics Games were recorded and classified in two groups of variables to analyze variables related to match (5) and set (15). A descriptive analysis and univariate test (Mann-Whitney U) for non-parametric data were conducted. The results show in men's and women's singles all the variables related to match were higher in the Elimination Phase than in the Group Phase (p < 0.01). In Sets 1 and 3, the longest set duration, rally and average rally were found in the Elimination Phase than Group Stage (p < 0.05). In women's singles, these differences were also recorded in Set 2. For doubles, the results are more stable among groups. Men's doubles had a longer duration of the match and set (sets 1 and set 2) (p < 0.01), and also scored highest for average rally strokes (sets 1 3) < 0.05) and shuttles used in the Elimination Phase vs. the Group Phase along the match (p < 0.01). In women's doubles, more shuttles were used in a match in the Elimination than in the Group Phase. Moreover, the same results are established for Set 2, including for average rally. Mixed doubles saw no match going to three sets. However, the greatest differences showed a longer rally and average rally being registered in the Elimination than in the Group Phase. In conclusion, the timing factors of the badminton singles and doubles games were different in the Elimination and Group Phases. This information may help players and coaches prepare and administer different types of workouts or, more specifically, competition schedules adapted to the characteristics of modern badminton.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Technical and timing characteristics of badminton men's single: comparison between groups and play-offs stages in 2016 Rio Olympic Games
    Cren Chiminazzo, Joao Guilherme
    Barreira, Julia
    Luz, Leandro S. M.
    Saraiva, William C.
    Cayres, Josue T.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS IN SPORT, 2018, 18 (02) : 245 - 254
  • [42] Preparedness for the Rio 2016 Olympic Games: hospital treatment capacity in georeferenced areas
    Freitas, Carolina Figueiredo
    Serpa Osorio-de-Castro, Claudia Garcia
    Shoaf, Kimberley Irene
    da Silva, Raulino Sabino
    Miranda, Elaine Silva
    CADERNOS DE SAUDE PUBLICA, 2016, 32 (07):
  • [43] What can medical educators learn from the Rio 2016 Olympic Games?
    Church, Helen
    Murdoch-Eaton, Deborah
    Patel, Rakesh
    Sandars, John
    MEDICAL TEACHER, 2017, 39 (06) : 665 - 666
  • [44] RIO 2016 OLYMPIC GAMES: THE PROCESS OF EVICTION AND RESISTANCE OF VILAAUTODROMO'S RESIDENTS
    Previatti, Carine botelho
    EVENT MANAGEMENT, 2023, 27 (06): : 951 - 965
  • [45] Food Provision at the Rio 2016 Olympic Games: Expert Review and Future Recommendations
    Pelly, Fiona
    Simmons, Susie Parker
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPORT NUTRITION AND EXERCISE METABOLISM, 2019, 29 (04) : 382 - 387
  • [46] Threat of Zika Virus to the 2016 Rio de Janeiro Olympic and Paralympic Games
    Weatherhead J.E.
    da Silva J.
    Murray K.O.
    Current Tropical Medicine Reports, 2016, 3 (3) : 120 - 125
  • [47] Preparation and organization of Brazilian physical therapy for the Rio 2016 Olympic and Paralympic Games
    Mendonca, Luciana D.
    Macedo, Christiane S. G.
    Antonelo, Marcio C.
    Alves, Marco Antonio F.
    Medeiros, Leonardo T.
    Tadiello, Felipe F.
    PHYSICAL THERAPY IN SPORT, 2017, 25 : 62 - 64
  • [48] 2016 Rio Olympic Games: Can the schedule of events compromise athletes' performance?
    Rosa, Joao Paulo P.
    Rodrigues, Dayane F.
    Silva, Andressa
    de Moura Simim, Mario Antonio
    Costa, Varley T.
    Noce, Franco
    de Mello, Marco Tulio
    CHRONOBIOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2016, 33 (04) : 435 - 440
  • [49] Air Quality in the Maracand and Deodoro Zones During the Rio 2016 Olympic Games
    Bezerra, Carolina A.
    de Carvalho, Nicole J.
    Geraldino, Claudio G. P.
    da Silva, Cleyton M.
    Arbilla, Graciela
    JOURNAL OF THE BRAZILIAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2018, 29 (11) : 2220 - 2232
  • [50] A City at Play: Rio de Janeiro on the Eve of the 2016 Olympic and Paralympic Games
    Nobre, Ana Luiza
    ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN, 2016, 86 (03) : 28 - 39