Statistical Differences in Set Analysis in Badminton at the RIO 2016 Olympic Games

被引:18
|
作者
Torres-Luque, Gema [1 ]
Ivan Fernandez-Garcia, Angel [2 ]
Carlos Blanca-Torres, Juan [1 ]
Kondric, Miran [3 ]
Cabello-Manrique, David [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Jaen, Dept Didact Mus Plast & Body Express, Jaen, Spain
[2] Univ Zaragoza, Dept Physiatry & Nursing, Zaragoza, Spain
[3] Univ Ljubljana, Fac Sport, Dept Racket Sports, Ljubljana, Slovenia
[4] Univ Granada, Dept Phys Educ & Sports, Granada, Spain
来源
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY | 2019年 / 10卷
关键词
notational analysis; match analysis; racket sports; performance indicators; performance analysis; badminton; MENS SINGLES; MATCHES; COMPETITION; PLAYERS; TENNIS;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00731
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The aim of the present study was to determine statistical differences in a set of badminton competition matches in five different modalities with regard to competition level (Group Phase vs. Eliminatory Phase). Data from 453 sets (125 in men's singles; 108 sets in women's singles; 77 sets in men's doubles; 73 in women's doubles and 70 in mixed doubles) from the RIO 2016 Olympics Games were recorded and classified in two groups of variables to analyze variables related to match (5) and set (15). A descriptive analysis and univariate test (Mann-Whitney U) for non-parametric data were conducted. The results show in men's and women's singles all the variables related to match were higher in the Elimination Phase than in the Group Phase (p < 0.01). In Sets 1 and 3, the longest set duration, rally and average rally were found in the Elimination Phase than Group Stage (p < 0.05). In women's singles, these differences were also recorded in Set 2. For doubles, the results are more stable among groups. Men's doubles had a longer duration of the match and set (sets 1 and set 2) (p < 0.01), and also scored highest for average rally strokes (sets 1 3) < 0.05) and shuttles used in the Elimination Phase vs. the Group Phase along the match (p < 0.01). In women's doubles, more shuttles were used in a match in the Elimination than in the Group Phase. Moreover, the same results are established for Set 2, including for average rally. Mixed doubles saw no match going to three sets. However, the greatest differences showed a longer rally and average rally being registered in the Elimination than in the Group Phase. In conclusion, the timing factors of the badminton singles and doubles games were different in the Elimination and Group Phases. This information may help players and coaches prepare and administer different types of workouts or, more specifically, competition schedules adapted to the characteristics of modern badminton.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Meeting Expectations at the 2016 Rio Olympic Games: Country Potential and Competitiveness
    Otamendi, F. Javier
    Doncel, Luis M.
    Martin-Gutierrez, Cecilia
    SOCIAL SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 2020, 101 (02) : 656 - 677
  • [32] Rio 2016 Olympic Games: Brand and the reciprocal effects of touristic destinations
    Ferreira, Luciana Brandao
    Engracia Giraldi, Janaina de Moura
    de Oliveira Santos, Glauber Eduardo
    Chiappetta Jabbour, Charbel Jose
    JOURNAL OF VACATION MARKETING, 2022, 28 (03) : 335 - 349
  • [33] Eye care and ocular findings at the Olympic and Paralympic Games Rio 2016
    Lima, Vagner Loduca
    Fernandes, Arthur Gustavo
    Viana, Rodrigo Galvao
    Feder, David
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2021, 55 (11) : 596 - 600
  • [34] Zika Virus - Impact on the 2016 Olympic Games in Rio de Janeiro
    Warnke, K.
    Paul, J.
    SPORTVERLETZUNG-SPORTSCHADEN, 2016, 30 (03) : 154 - 156
  • [35] Students' perception about the Olympic Values experience in Rio 2016 Olympic Games and the future of the Olympics
    Merlin, Gabriel
    Mueller, Norbert
    Todt, Nelson
    JOURNAL OF HUMAN SPORT AND EXERCISE, 2019, 14 : S336 - S347
  • [36] Cardiovascular screening of Olympic athletes reported by chief medical officers of the Rio 2016 Olympic Games
    Toresdahl, Brett G.
    Asif, Irfan M.
    Rodeo, Scott A.
    Ling, Daphne I.
    Chang, Cindy J.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2018, 52 (17) : 1097 - 1100
  • [37] Exploring the age of taekwondo athletes in the Olympic Games: an analysis from Sydney 2000 to Rio 2016
    Apollaro, Gennaro
    Ruscello, Bruno
    JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE AND PHYSICAL FITNESS, 2022, 62 (06): : 838 - 845
  • [38] A Country-Level Efficiency Analysis of the 2016 Summer Olympic Games in Rio: A Complete Picture
    del Corral, Julio
    Gomez-Gonzalez, Carlos
    Manuel Sanchez-Santos, Jose
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPORT FINANCE, 2017, 12 (03): : 265 - 293
  • [39] The Olympic Games' impact on the development of teachers: the case of Rio 2016 Official Olympic Education Programme
    Ribeiro, Tiago
    Correia, Abel
    Figueiredo, Carlos
    Biscaia, Rui
    EDUCATIONAL REVIEW, 2022, 74 (05) : 992 - 1011
  • [40] Zika and Rio Olympic Games
    Shadgan, Babak
    Pakravan, Amir
    Zaeimkohan, Hamid
    Shahpar, Farhad Moradi
    Khodaee, Morteza
    CURRENT SPORTS MEDICINE REPORTS, 2016, 15 (04) : 298 - 300