A performance comparison study between two HPGe lung counters with different detector configurations

被引:0
|
作者
Naito, Masayuki [1 ]
Tamakuma, Yuki [2 ]
Mihei, Yuma [1 ]
Yajima, Kazuaki [1 ]
Tani, Kotaro [1 ,3 ]
Kim, Eunjoo [1 ]
Kowatari, Munehiko [1 ]
Kurihara, Osamu [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Inst Quantum Sci & Technol, 4-9-1 Anagawa, Chiba 2638555, Japan
[2] Nagasaki Univ, 1-12-4 Sakamoto, Nagasaki 8528523, Japan
[3] Tokyo Metropolitan Univ, 7-2-10 Higashi Ogu, Tokyo 1168551, Japan
关键词
SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1093/rpd/ncae183
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This study compares the performance of old and new lung counters in the National Institutes for Quantum Sciences and Technology of Japan. The total sensitive area of the detector crystals for the new lung counter is similar to 15% smaller than that for the old lung counter. Minimum detectable activities (MDAs) for Am-241 and Pu-239 were evaluated through experiments using a Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory torso phantom. Despite differences in detector configuration, the MDAs were found to be comparable between the two lung counters. For a chest wall thickness of 2.1 cm and a counting time of 30 min, the MDAs of Am-241 and Pu-239 were 5.7 and 2300 Bq for the old lung counter, and 5.5 and 2600 Bq for the new lung counter, respectively. Experimental results for the relative sensitivities between left-side and right-side detectors suggested that the new lung counter offered better measurement geometry.
引用
收藏
页码:1486 / 1491
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Performance study of new pixel hybrid photon detector prototypes for the LHCb RICH counters
    Moritz, M
    Rinella, GA
    Allebone, L
    Campbell, M
    Gys, I
    Newby, C
    Pickford, A
    Piedigrossi, D
    Wyllie, K
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NUCLEAR SCIENCE, 2004, 51 (03) : 1060 - 1066
  • [32] A computational study of two-dimensional serpentine nozzle performance with different annular mixer configurations
    Abdelmotalib, Hamada Mohmed
    Lee, Changwook
    Seo, Yechan
    Lee, Jeekeun
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL SCIENCES, 2021, 208
  • [33] Comparison between four different suture configurations for rotator cuff repair: a biomechanical animal study
    Haroun, Yahia
    Sobhy, Mohamed H.
    Khater, Hany A.
    Khater, Ahmad H.
    SICOT-J, 2024, 10
  • [34] Performance comparison between a conventional helicopter and compound helicopter configurations
    Ferguson, Kevin
    Thomson, Douglas
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART G-JOURNAL OF AEROSPACE ENGINEERING, 2015, 229 (13) : 2441 - 2456
  • [35] An MPPC alpha detection performance comparison study by two different scintillators
    Osmanagaoglu, Cevdet Zafer
    Celiktas, Cuneyt
    EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL PLUS, 2024, 139 (11):
  • [36] Performance comparison between two different virtual transformations of the hemisphere conformal array
    Zhang, Xuejing
    Yang, Zhiwei
    Liao, Guisheng
    Xi'an Dianzi Keji Daxue Xuebao/Journal of Xidian University, 2014, 41 (03): : 33 - 40
  • [37] Comparison of earth pipe cooling performance between two different piping systems
    Ahmed, S. F.
    Khan, M. M. K.
    Rasul, M. G.
    Amanullah, M. T. O.
    Hassan, N. M. S.
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON APPLIED ENERGY, ICAE2014, 2014, 61 : 1897 - 1901
  • [38] A Comparison between the Performance of Two Different Cation Groups in Anion Exchange Membranes
    Tadavani, Koorosh Firouz
    Abdolmaleki, Amir
    Molavian, Mohammad Reza
    Zhiani, Mohammad
    ENERGY & FUELS, 2019, 33 (11) : 12016 - 12025
  • [39] Comparison of Axial Flux Machine Performance with Different Rotor and Stator Configurations
    Husain, Tausif
    Tekgun, Burak
    Sozer, Yilmaz
    Hamdan, Marv
    2017 IEEE INTERNATIONAL ELECTRIC MACHINES AND DRIVES CONFERENCE (IEMDC), 2017,
  • [40] Comparison between two different fixed-bed reactor configurations for nitrogen removal coupled to biogas biodesulfurization
    Solcia Guerrero, Renata de Bello
    Diniz dos Santos, Carla Eloisa
    Soares, Lais Americo
    Zaiat, Marcelo
    BIOCHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2020, 162