Comparative efficacy and safety of ciprofol, propofol, and propofol and etomidate mixture, and ciprofol and etomidate mixture in patients undergoing painless gastroscopy: A randomized, double-blind controlled clinical trial

被引:0
|
作者
Liu, Yanlong [1 ]
Qian, Yihong [1 ]
Zhang, Lilan [1 ]
Guo, Shanliang [1 ]
Fan, Longcheng [1 ]
Zhang, Mingsheng [1 ]
Liu, Zhongyu [1 ]
机构
[1] Jiangxi Prov Peoples Hosp, Affiliated Hosp 1, Nanchang Med Coll, Dept Anesthesiol, Nanchang 330006, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
关键词
ciprofol; etomidate; gastroscopy; propofol;
D O I
10.1097/MD.0000000000039585
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: To compare the efficacy and safety of ciprofol, propofol, propofol and etomidate mixture or ciprofol and etomidate mixture in patients undergoing painless gastroscopic anesthesia, and to explore the optimal plan to relieve the patient's discomfort. Methods: A total of 120 patients scheduled for painless gastroscopy were randomly assigned to 4 groups: propofol (Group P), ciprofol (Group C), propofol-etomidate mixture (Group P-E), and ciprofol-etomidate mixture (Group C-E). The success rate of gastroscopy examination, patient satisfaction, incidence of injection pain, hemodynamic parameters, induction time, procedure time, the consumption of drugs, awakening time, and incidence of adverse events were evaluated. Results: All patients in the study successfully completed the gastroscopy. The satisfaction of patients in Group C-E was significantly higher than that in Group P (P < .05), but there was no statistical significance in the patient satisfaction among the other groups. Compared with Group P, the incidence of injection pain in Groups C and C-E significantly decreased (P < .05). There were no significant differences in the SBP, diastolic blood pressure, HR, and SpO2 among the 4 groups (P > .05). The awakening time of Group C was significantly longer than that of Groups P and P-E (P < .05), but there was no statistically significant difference in the awakening time of other groups. Conclusion: Ciprofol demonstrated efficacy in inducing sedation or anesthesia during painless gastroscopy that was similar to propofol, while exhibiting a comparable safety profile. Moreover, the combination of propofol and etomidate, as well as the combination of ciprofol and etomidate, were both shown to be equally safe and effective for this clinical application. These findings suggest that ciprofol can be considered as a safe and effective alternative for painless gastroscopy, and the ciprofol-etomidate mixture may be a better choice.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Safety and efficacy of etomidate/midazolam and propofol/midazolam sedations for screening colonoscopy: A prospective, randomized controlled trial
    Lee, Jung Min
    Choi, Seong Ji
    Jeon, Han Jo
    Jang, Sehyun
    Kim, Seung Han
    Lee, Jae Min
    Choi, Hyuk Soon
    Kim, Eun Sun
    Keum, Bora
    Jeen, Yoon Tae
    Chun, Hoon Jai
    Lee, Hong Sik
    Kim, Chang Duck
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2018, 33 : 255 - 255
  • [32] Comparison of the efficacy and safety of ciprofol and propofol for ERCP anesthesia in older patients: A single-center randomized controlled clinical study
    Li, Chui-Yu
    Xie, Wen-Xi
    Chen, Zhi-Yuan
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 2024, 99
  • [33] Bispectral index-guided induction of general anaesthesia in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery using propofol or etomidate: a double-blind, randomized, clinical trial
    Petrun, A. Moeller
    Kamenik, M.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2013, 110 (03) : 388 - 396
  • [34] Efficacy and safety of subanesthetic doses of esketamine combined with propofol in painless gastrointestinal endoscopy: a prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial
    Yongtong Zhan
    Shuqing Liang
    Zecheng Yang
    Qichen Luo
    Shuai Li
    Jiamin Li
    Zhaojia Liang
    Yalan Li
    BMC Gastroenterology, 22
  • [35] Efficacy and safety of subanesthetic doses of esketamine combined with propofol in painless gastrointestinal endoscopy: a prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial
    Zhan, Yongtong
    Liang, Shuqing
    Yang, Zecheng
    Luo, Qichen
    Li, Shuai
    Li, Jiamin
    Liang, Zhaojia
    Li, Yalan
    BMC GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [36] Esketamine as an Adjuvant to Ciprofol or Propofol Sedation for Same-Day Bidirectional Endoscopy: Protocol for a Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Trial With Factorial Design
    Long, Yu-Qin
    Feng, Chang-Dong
    Ding, Yun-Ying
    Feng, Xiao-Mei
    Liu, Hong
    Ji, Fu-Hai
    Peng, Ke
    FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [37] Comparison of postoperative awakening between ciprofol and propofol in elderly patients undergoing hip replacement surgery: a single-blind, randomized, controlled trial
    Yang, Dawei
    Zhou, Jie
    Sun, Luyu
    Li, Min
    Zhang, Jianyou
    MINERVA ANESTESIOLOGICA, 2024, 90 (12) : 1074 - 1081
  • [38] Comparison of postoperative awakening between ciprofol and propofol in elderly patients undergoing hip replacement surgery: a single-blind, randomized, controlled trial
    Yang, Dawei
    Zhou, Jie
    Sun, Luyu
    Li, Min
    Zhang, Jianyou
    MINERVA ANESTESIOLOGICA, 2024,
  • [39] Influences of Propofol, Ciprofol and Remimazolam on Dreaming During Anesthesia for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: A Randomized Double-Blind Parallel-Design Trial
    Zhou, Rui
    Fu, Lijuan
    Liu, Shu
    Gao, Sanjie
    Zhao, Zhifu
    Jiang, Wencai
    Liu, Li
    Ren, Weiqiao
    Xiang, Dongmei
    You, Xing
    Tang, Chunyong
    Zhou, Yukai
    Song, Yanqing
    Xie, Juan
    Xie, Li
    Yu, Ru
    Zhang, Xianjie
    Zhou, Dan
    Han, Jia
    Xia, Leqiang
    Xiong, Lize
    DRUG DESIGN DEVELOPMENT AND THERAPY, 2024, 18 : 1907 - 1915
  • [40] The efficacy and safety of ciprofol versus propofol for deep sedation during colonoscopy: A phase III, multi-center, randomized, double-blind, non-inferiority trial
    Li Junxiang
    Wang Xiao
    Liu Jin
    Wang Xia
    Zuo YunXia
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2021, 133 (3S_SUPPL): : 264 - 264