Comparative efficacy and safety of ciprofol, propofol, and propofol and etomidate mixture, and ciprofol and etomidate mixture in patients undergoing painless gastroscopy: A randomized, double-blind controlled clinical trial

被引:0
|
作者
Liu, Yanlong [1 ]
Qian, Yihong [1 ]
Zhang, Lilan [1 ]
Guo, Shanliang [1 ]
Fan, Longcheng [1 ]
Zhang, Mingsheng [1 ]
Liu, Zhongyu [1 ]
机构
[1] Jiangxi Prov Peoples Hosp, Affiliated Hosp 1, Nanchang Med Coll, Dept Anesthesiol, Nanchang 330006, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
关键词
ciprofol; etomidate; gastroscopy; propofol;
D O I
10.1097/MD.0000000000039585
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: To compare the efficacy and safety of ciprofol, propofol, propofol and etomidate mixture or ciprofol and etomidate mixture in patients undergoing painless gastroscopic anesthesia, and to explore the optimal plan to relieve the patient's discomfort. Methods: A total of 120 patients scheduled for painless gastroscopy were randomly assigned to 4 groups: propofol (Group P), ciprofol (Group C), propofol-etomidate mixture (Group P-E), and ciprofol-etomidate mixture (Group C-E). The success rate of gastroscopy examination, patient satisfaction, incidence of injection pain, hemodynamic parameters, induction time, procedure time, the consumption of drugs, awakening time, and incidence of adverse events were evaluated. Results: All patients in the study successfully completed the gastroscopy. The satisfaction of patients in Group C-E was significantly higher than that in Group P (P < .05), but there was no statistical significance in the patient satisfaction among the other groups. Compared with Group P, the incidence of injection pain in Groups C and C-E significantly decreased (P < .05). There were no significant differences in the SBP, diastolic blood pressure, HR, and SpO2 among the 4 groups (P > .05). The awakening time of Group C was significantly longer than that of Groups P and P-E (P < .05), but there was no statistically significant difference in the awakening time of other groups. Conclusion: Ciprofol demonstrated efficacy in inducing sedation or anesthesia during painless gastroscopy that was similar to propofol, while exhibiting a comparable safety profile. Moreover, the combination of propofol and etomidate, as well as the combination of ciprofol and etomidate, were both shown to be equally safe and effective for this clinical application. These findings suggest that ciprofol can be considered as a safe and effective alternative for painless gastroscopy, and the ciprofol-etomidate mixture may be a better choice.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparative efficacy of ciprofol and propofol in reducing respiratory depression during ERCP anesthesia: a randomized controlled trial
    Wang, Juanhong
    Wang, Rui
    Ma, Xiaofang
    Zhu, Wenjing
    Zhang, Baoping
    Ma, Yuhu
    Liu, Yatao
    BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2024, 24 (01):
  • [22] Efficacy and safety of esketamine combined with propofol for conscious sedation in painless colonoscopy: a prospective, randomized, double-blind controlled clinical trial
    Xiao, Lizhu
    Zhang, Zhenghua
    Lu, Jing
    Liu, Zhaoguo
    Zhang, Jiaoling
    Kang, Lu
    Tang, Jiefu
    Zou, Xiaohua
    BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2024, 24 (01):
  • [23] Combination of propofol and dezocine to improve safety and efficacy of anesthesia for gastroscopy and colonoscopy in adults: A randomized, double-blind, controlled trial
    Xue-Ting Li
    Chao-Qun Ma
    Si-Hua Qi
    Li-Min Zhang
    World Journal of Clinical Cases, 2019, (20) : 3237 - 3246
  • [24] Combination of propofol and dezocine to improve safety and efficacy of anesthesia for gastroscopy and colonoscopy in adults: A randomized, double-blind, controlled trial
    Li, Xue-Ting
    Ma, Chao-Qun
    Qi, Si-Hua
    Zhang, Li-Min
    WORLD JOURNAL OF CLINICAL CASES, 2019, 7 (20) : 3237 - 3246
  • [25] Neurologic Safety of Etomidate-Based Sedation during Upper Endoscopy in Patients with Liver Cirrhosis Compared with Propofol: A Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial
    Jung, Jang Han
    Hyun, Bomi
    Lee, Jin
    Koh, Dong Hee
    Kim, Jung Hee
    Park, Se Woo
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2020, 9 (08) : 1 - 12
  • [26] Comparison of the influence of low dose etomidate and propofol as priming dose on the incidence of etomidate induced myoclonus: a randomised, double-blind clinical trial
    Moningi, Srilata
    Reddy, G. Poojitha
    Nikhar, Sapna Annaji
    Chikkala, Ramakrishna
    Kulkarni, Dilip Kumar
    Ramachandran, Gopinath
    BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2022, 72 (02): : 261 - 266
  • [27] Comparison of the efficacy and safety of ciprofol and propofol for ERCP anesthesia in older patients: A single-center randomized controlled clinical study
    Ding, Guopeng
    Wang, Li
    Zhao, Wantong
    Diao, Yugang
    Song, Dandan
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 2024, 99
  • [28] Efficacy and safety of ciprofol-remifentanil versus propofol-remifentanil during fiberoptic bronchoscopy: A prospective, randomized, double-blind, non-inferiority trial
    Wu, Bin
    Zhu, Wenchao
    Wang, Qinghe
    Ren, Chunguang
    Wang, Lizhen
    Xie, Guannan
    FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [29] Does etomidate increase postoperative nausea? A double-blind controlled comparison of etomidate in lipid emulsion with propofol for balanced anaesthesia
    St Pierre, M
    Dunkel, M
    Rutherford, A
    Hering, W
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2000, 17 (10) : 634 - 641
  • [30] Cardiovascular effects of anesthesia in ECT: A randomized, double-blind comparison of etomidate, propofol, and thiopental
    Rosa, Moacyr Alexandro
    Rosa, Marina O.
    Marcolin, Marco A.
    Fregni, Felipe
    JOURNAL OF ECT, 2007, 23 (01) : 6 - 8