Comparative efficacy and safety of ciprofol, propofol, and propofol and etomidate mixture, and ciprofol and etomidate mixture in patients undergoing painless gastroscopy: A randomized, double-blind controlled clinical trial

被引:0
|
作者
Liu, Yanlong [1 ]
Qian, Yihong [1 ]
Zhang, Lilan [1 ]
Guo, Shanliang [1 ]
Fan, Longcheng [1 ]
Zhang, Mingsheng [1 ]
Liu, Zhongyu [1 ]
机构
[1] Jiangxi Prov Peoples Hosp, Affiliated Hosp 1, Nanchang Med Coll, Dept Anesthesiol, Nanchang 330006, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
关键词
ciprofol; etomidate; gastroscopy; propofol;
D O I
10.1097/MD.0000000000039585
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: To compare the efficacy and safety of ciprofol, propofol, propofol and etomidate mixture or ciprofol and etomidate mixture in patients undergoing painless gastroscopic anesthesia, and to explore the optimal plan to relieve the patient's discomfort. Methods: A total of 120 patients scheduled for painless gastroscopy were randomly assigned to 4 groups: propofol (Group P), ciprofol (Group C), propofol-etomidate mixture (Group P-E), and ciprofol-etomidate mixture (Group C-E). The success rate of gastroscopy examination, patient satisfaction, incidence of injection pain, hemodynamic parameters, induction time, procedure time, the consumption of drugs, awakening time, and incidence of adverse events were evaluated. Results: All patients in the study successfully completed the gastroscopy. The satisfaction of patients in Group C-E was significantly higher than that in Group P (P < .05), but there was no statistical significance in the patient satisfaction among the other groups. Compared with Group P, the incidence of injection pain in Groups C and C-E significantly decreased (P < .05). There were no significant differences in the SBP, diastolic blood pressure, HR, and SpO2 among the 4 groups (P > .05). The awakening time of Group C was significantly longer than that of Groups P and P-E (P < .05), but there was no statistically significant difference in the awakening time of other groups. Conclusion: Ciprofol demonstrated efficacy in inducing sedation or anesthesia during painless gastroscopy that was similar to propofol, while exhibiting a comparable safety profile. Moreover, the combination of propofol and etomidate, as well as the combination of ciprofol and etomidate, were both shown to be equally safe and effective for this clinical application. These findings suggest that ciprofol can be considered as a safe and effective alternative for painless gastroscopy, and the ciprofol-etomidate mixture may be a better choice.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The efficacy and safety of ciprofol versus propofol in patients undergoing painless hysteroscopy: a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial
    Li, Aijun
    Li, Ning
    Zhu, Lei
    Xu, Zige
    Wang, Yifan
    Li, Junjie
    Zhang, Gerong
    BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2024, 24 (01):
  • [2] The efficacy and safety of ciprofol and propofol in patients undergoing colonoscopy: A double-blind, randomized, controlled trial
    Gao, Shi-Hui
    Tang, Qian-Qian
    Wang, Chang-Ming
    Guan, Zhan-Ying
    Wang, Ling-Ling
    Zhang, Jing
    Yan, Zeng-Long
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 2024, 95
  • [3] Safety and efficacy of etomidate and propofol anesthesia in elderly patients undergoing gastroscopy: A double-blind randomized clinical study
    Meng, Qing-Tao
    Cao, Chen
    Liu, Hui-Min
    Xia, Zhong-Yuan
    Li, Wei
    Tang, Ling-Hua
    Chen, Rong
    Jiang, Meng
    Wu, Yang
    Leng, Yan
    Lee, Chris C.
    EXPERIMENTAL AND THERAPEUTIC MEDICINE, 2016, 12 (03) : 1515 - 1524
  • [4] A Study Evaluating the Clinical Effect of Ciprofol Compared with Propofol and Etomidate in Patients Undergoing Gastroscopy and Colonoscopy
    Zhao, Zhifu
    Zhang, Xianjie
    Xia, Leqiang
    Liu, Li
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2024, 139 (06): : 1870 - 1871
  • [5] Effect of propofol and ciprofol on the euphoric reaction in patients with painless gastroscopy: A prospective randomized controlled trial
    Li, Teng
    Zhang, Jin
    Liu, Zhouliang
    Lu, Yao
    Gong, Chuhao
    Han, Dan
    Wu, Ying
    Gao, Kailun
    Heng, Lei
    Wang, Liwei
    Peng, Peng
    HELIYON, 2024, 10 (09)
  • [6] Effect of propofol and ciprofol in patients undergoing bronchoscopy: protocol for a double-blind, randomised controlled trial
    Tang, Jinxuan
    Chen, Fang
    Huang, Jiayu
    Li, Dongliang
    Li, Cheng
    BMJ OPEN, 2025, 15 (01):
  • [7] Comparison of the safety and efficacy of ciprofol monotherapy versus combined propofol for painless gastroscopy
    Shan, Yongzhuang
    Zhai, Wenshan
    Hou, Yayun
    Li, Guangming
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES, 2024, 37 (06) : 1391 - 1399
  • [8] Efficacy and Safety of Ciprofol Versus Propofol as Anesthetic for Patients Undergoing Painless Colonoscopy
    He, Ke Qiang
    Huang, Ting Ting
    Tan, Meng Yuan
    Gao, Chen
    Wang, Sheng
    PAIN AND THERAPY, 2024, 13 (06) : 1633 - 1644
  • [9] Effects of Ciprofol and Propofol General Anesthesia on Postoperative Recovery Quality in Patients Undergoing Ureteroscopy: A Randomized, Controlled, Double-Blind Clinical Trial
    Shi, Shuqi
    Wu, Jimin
    Wu, Yini
    Han, Xin
    Dai, Hong
    Chen, Xuedong
    Sun, Zhangnan
    Wang, Faxing
    DRUG DESIGN DEVELOPMENT AND THERAPY, 2025, 19 : 931 - 943
  • [10] Ciprofol versus propofol for anesthesia induction in cardiac surgery: a randomized double-blind controlled clinical trial
    Yu, Le
    Liu, Xiang
    Zhao, Xiang
    Shan, Xiu
    Bischof, Evelyne
    Lu, Hui-hong
    BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2024, 24 (01):