Accuracy of deep learning in the differential diagnosis of coronary artery stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Tu, Li [1 ]
Deng, Ying [1 ]
Chen, Yun [1 ]
Luo, Yi [1 ]
机构
[1] Chongqing Med Univ, Dept Cardiovasc Dis, Branch 1, Affiliated Hosp 1, 191 Renmin Rd, Chongqing 400012, Peoples R China
来源
BMC MEDICAL IMAGING | 2024年 / 24卷 / 01期
关键词
Artificial intelligence; Deep learning; Coronary artery stenosis; FRACTIONAL FLOW RESERVE; ARTIFICIAL-INTELLIGENCE; ANGIOGRAPHY; PERFORMANCE; DISEASE;
D O I
10.1186/s12880-024-01403-4
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background In recent years, as deep learning has received widespread attention in the field of heart disease, some studies have explored the potential of deep learning based on coronary angiography (CAG) or coronary CT angiography (CCTA) images in detecting the extent of coronary artery stenosis. However, there is still a lack of a systematic understanding of its diagnostic accuracy, impeding the advancement of intelligent diagnosis of coronary artery stenosis. Therefore, we conducted this study to review the accuracy of image-based deep learning in detecting coronary artery stenosis. Methods We retrieved PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, and Web of Science until April 11, 2023. The risk of bias in the included studies was appraised using the QUADAS-2 tool. We extracted the accuracy of deep learning in the test set and performed subgroup analyses by binary and multiclass classification scenarios. We performed a subgroup analysis based on different degrees of stenosis and applied a double arcsine transformation to process the data. The analysis was done by using R. Results Our systematic review finally included 18 studies, involving 3568 patients and 13,362 images. In the included studies, deep learning models were constructed based on CAG and CCTA. In binary classification tasks, the accuracy for detecting > 25%, > 50% and > 70% degrees of stenosis at the vessel level were 0.81 (95% CI: 0.71-0.85), 0.73 (95% CI: 0.58-0.88) and 0.61 (95% CI: 0.56-0.65), respectively. In multiclass classification tasks, the accuracy for detecting 0-25%, 25-50%, 50-70%, and 70-100% degrees of stenosis at the vessel level were 0.78 (95% CI: 0.73-0.84), 0.86 (95% CI: 0.78-0.93), 0.83 (95% CI: 0.70-0.97), and 0.70 (95% CI: 0.42-0.98), respectively. Conclusions Our study shows that deep learning models based on CAG and CCTA appear to be relatively accurate in diagnosing different degrees of coronary artery stenosis. However, for various degrees of stenosis, their accuracy still needs to be further improved.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Deep learning and machine learning in CT-based COPD diagnosis: Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wu, Qian
    Guo, Hui
    Li, Ruihan
    Han, Jinhuan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2025, 196
  • [42] Accuracy of circulating microRNAs in diagnosis of sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Xiaomin Shen
    Jiajie Zhang
    Yicheng Huang
    Jiepeng Tong
    Li Zhang
    Zhijuan Zhang
    Wei Yu
    Yunqing Qiu
    Journal of Intensive Care, 8
  • [43] Accuracy of microRNAs for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    He, Song
    Hu, Xiao-Wu
    Wang, Dong
    Han, Ling-Fei
    Zhang, De-Chun
    Wei, Cheng
    CLINICS AND RESEARCH IN HEPATOLOGY AND GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2016, 40 (04) : 405 - 417
  • [44] Accuracy of clinical diagnosis of Parkinson disease A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Rizzo, Giovanni
    Copetti, Massimiliano
    Arcuti, Simona
    Martino, Davide
    Fontana, Andrea
    Logroscino, Giancarlo
    NEUROLOGY, 2016, 86 (06) : 566 - 576
  • [45] Transvaginal Ultrasound Accuracy in the Hydrosalpinx Diagnosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Delgado-Morell, Aina
    Nieto-Tous, Mar
    Andrada-Ripolles, Cristina
    Pascual, Maria Angela
    Ajossa, Silvia
    Guerriero, Stefano
    Alcazar, Juan Luis
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2023, 13 (05)
  • [46] Accuracy of circulating microRNAs in diagnosis of sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Shen, Xiaomin
    Zhang, Jiajie
    Huang, Yicheng
    Tong, Jiepeng
    Zhang, Li
    Zhang, Zhijuan
    Yu, Wei
    Qiu, Yunqing
    JOURNAL OF INTENSIVE CARE, 2020, 8 (01)
  • [47] Accuracy of rapid diagnosis of Talaromyces marneffei: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ning, Chuanyi
    Lai, Jingzhen
    Wei, Wudi
    Zhou, Bo
    Huang, Jiegang
    Jiang, Junjun
    Liang, Bingyu
    Liao, Yanyan
    Zang, Ning
    Cao, Cunwei
    Chen, Hui
    Ye, Li
    Liang, Hao
    PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (04):
  • [48] Diagnostic accuracy of MRI in the differential diagnosis between uterine leiomyomas and sarcomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Raffone, Antonio
    Raimondo, Diego
    Neola, Daniele
    Travaglino, Antonio
    Giorgi, Matteo
    Lazzeri, Lucia
    De Laurentiis, Francesco
    Carravetta, Carlo
    Zupi, Errico
    Seracchioli, Renato
    Casadio, Paolo
    Guida, Maurizio
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2024, 165 (01) : 22 - 33
  • [49] Accuracy of the 10 μg desmopressin test for differential diagnosis of Cushing syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Giampietro, Rodrigo Rosa
    Cabral, Marcos Vinicius Gama
    Pereira, Elizandra Gomes
    Machado, Marcio Carlos
    Vilar, Lucio
    Nunes-Nogueira, Vania dos Santos
    FRONTIERS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2024, 15
  • [50] Accuracy of transvaginal ultrasound for diagnosis of deep infiltrating endometriosis in the uterosacral ligaments: Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhou, Yuli
    Su, Youhuan
    Liu, Huiyu
    Wu, Huaiyu
    Xu, Jinfeng
    Dong, Fajin
    JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY OBSTETRICS AND HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2021, 50 (03)