Accuracy of deep learning in the differential diagnosis of coronary artery stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Tu, Li [1 ]
Deng, Ying [1 ]
Chen, Yun [1 ]
Luo, Yi [1 ]
机构
[1] Chongqing Med Univ, Dept Cardiovasc Dis, Branch 1, Affiliated Hosp 1, 191 Renmin Rd, Chongqing 400012, Peoples R China
来源
BMC MEDICAL IMAGING | 2024年 / 24卷 / 01期
关键词
Artificial intelligence; Deep learning; Coronary artery stenosis; FRACTIONAL FLOW RESERVE; ARTIFICIAL-INTELLIGENCE; ANGIOGRAPHY; PERFORMANCE; DISEASE;
D O I
10.1186/s12880-024-01403-4
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background In recent years, as deep learning has received widespread attention in the field of heart disease, some studies have explored the potential of deep learning based on coronary angiography (CAG) or coronary CT angiography (CCTA) images in detecting the extent of coronary artery stenosis. However, there is still a lack of a systematic understanding of its diagnostic accuracy, impeding the advancement of intelligent diagnosis of coronary artery stenosis. Therefore, we conducted this study to review the accuracy of image-based deep learning in detecting coronary artery stenosis. Methods We retrieved PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, and Web of Science until April 11, 2023. The risk of bias in the included studies was appraised using the QUADAS-2 tool. We extracted the accuracy of deep learning in the test set and performed subgroup analyses by binary and multiclass classification scenarios. We performed a subgroup analysis based on different degrees of stenosis and applied a double arcsine transformation to process the data. The analysis was done by using R. Results Our systematic review finally included 18 studies, involving 3568 patients and 13,362 images. In the included studies, deep learning models were constructed based on CAG and CCTA. In binary classification tasks, the accuracy for detecting > 25%, > 50% and > 70% degrees of stenosis at the vessel level were 0.81 (95% CI: 0.71-0.85), 0.73 (95% CI: 0.58-0.88) and 0.61 (95% CI: 0.56-0.65), respectively. In multiclass classification tasks, the accuracy for detecting 0-25%, 25-50%, 50-70%, and 70-100% degrees of stenosis at the vessel level were 0.78 (95% CI: 0.73-0.84), 0.86 (95% CI: 0.78-0.93), 0.83 (95% CI: 0.70-0.97), and 0.70 (95% CI: 0.42-0.98), respectively. Conclusions Our study shows that deep learning models based on CAG and CCTA appear to be relatively accurate in diagnosing different degrees of coronary artery stenosis. However, for various degrees of stenosis, their accuracy still needs to be further improved.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Machine Learning and Deep Learning for Diagnosis of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Wang, Tianyi
    Chen, Ruiyuan
    Fan, Ning
    Zang, Lei
    Yuan, Shuo
    Du, Peng
    Wu, Qichao
    Wang, Aobo
    Li, Jian
    Kong, Xiaochuan
    Zhu, Wenyi
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2024, 26
  • [2] Deep learning for pneumothorax diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Sugibayashi, Takahiro
    Walston, Shannon L.
    Matsumoto, Toshimasa
    Mitsuyama, Yasuhito
    Miki, Yukio
    Ueda, Daiju
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY REVIEW, 2023, 32 (168):
  • [3] Magnetocardiography for the Diagnosis of Coronary Artery Disease - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Agarwal, Rajender
    Saini, Abhimanyu
    Alyousef, Tareq
    Umscheid, Craig A.
    ANNALS OF NONINVASIVE ELECTROCARDIOLOGY, 2012, 17 (04) : 291 - 298
  • [4] Diagnostic accuracy of deep learning in orthopaedic fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yang, S.
    Yin, B.
    Cao, W.
    Feng, C.
    Fan, G.
    He, S.
    CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2020, 75 (09) : 713.e17 - 713.e28
  • [5] Diagnostic accuracy of deep learning in medical imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Aggarwal, Ravi
    Sounderajah, Viknesh
    Martin, Guy
    Ting, Daniel S. W.
    Karthikesalingam, Alan
    King, Dominic
    Ashrafian, Hutan
    Darzi, Ara
    NPJ DIGITAL MEDICINE, 2021, 4 (01)
  • [6] Diagnostic accuracy of deep learning in prediction of osteoporosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Amani, Firouz
    Amanzadeh, Masoud
    Hamedan, Mahnaz
    Amani, Paniz
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2024, 25 (01)
  • [7] Diagnostic accuracy of deep learning in medical imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ravi Aggarwal
    Viknesh Sounderajah
    Guy Martin
    Daniel S. W. Ting
    Alan Karthikesalingam
    Dominic King
    Hutan Ashrafian
    Ara Darzi
    npj Digital Medicine, 4
  • [8] Machine learning for the diagnosis accuracy of bipolar disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Pan, Yi
    Wang, Pushi
    Xue, Bowen
    Liu, Yanbin
    Shen, Xinhua
    Wang, Shiliang
    Wang, Xing
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHIATRY, 2025, 15
  • [9] Diagnostic Accuracy of Cardiac MRI for Detecting Wall Motion Abnormalities and Coronary Artery Stenosis - A Systematic Review and Umbrella Meta-Analysis
    Panchal, Viraj
    Saifa-Bonsu, Johnnie
    Tamdin, Tenzin
    Honganur, Nagaraj Sanchitha
    Noei, Farahnaz
    Konka, Srujana
    Venkata, Vikramaditya R. Samala
    CIRCULATION, 2023, 148
  • [10] The accuracy of MRI in diagnosis of suspected deep vein thrombosis: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Fiona C. Sampson
    Steve W. Goodacre
    Steven M. Thomas
    Edwin J. R. van Beek
    European Radiology, 2007, 17