Sustainability Assessment Methods for the Transport Sector Considering the Life Cycle Concept-A Review

被引:1
|
作者
Burchart, Dorota [1 ]
Przytula, Iga [1 ]
机构
[1] Silesian Univ Tech, Fac Transport & Aviat Engn, Krasinskiego 8, PL-40019 Katowice, Poland
关键词
sustainable development; sustainable transport; multi-criteria decision analysis; life cycle sustainability assessment; ALTERNATIVE FUELS; SELECTION; VEHICLES; BIODIESEL; EMISSIONS; FRAMEWORK; OPTIONS; SYSTEM; GAS;
D O I
10.3390/su16188148
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper presents a summary and review of life cycle sustainability assessment (LCSA) methods for the transport sector. The paper provides a comprehensive overview of articles that employ a variety of methods for assessing sustainable development in the transport sector, taking into account the economic, social, and environmental dimensions. In the sustainability assessment of transport, three methods were evaluated: life cycle assessment (LCA), life cycle cost analysis (LCC), and social life cycle assessment (SLCA). An overview of sustainability assessment methods in transport and a review of the indicators used in the life cycle sustainability assessment was conducted. It was found that the selection of indicators within the LCSA for assessing various aspects of sustainable development is dependent on various geographic and policy contexts. An overview of the application of multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) methods to assess LCSA in the transport sector was performed. MCDA methods are used to support decision-making regarding the selection of the most sustainable transport options and allow for the simultaneous consideration of multiple criteria, enabling a more sustainable assessment of different transport options. MCDA methods help to rank alternative transportation fuels and help decision-makers consider indicators encompassing economic, environmental and social aspects.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Sustainability Assessment of Transport Infrastructure Projects: A Review of Existing Tools and Methods
    Bueno, P. C.
    Vassallo, J. M.
    Cheung, K.
    TRANSPORT REVIEWS, 2015, 35 (05) : 622 - 649
  • [42] Life Cycle Assessment and Life Cycle Costing for assessing maritime transport: a comprehensive literature review
    Mondello, Giovanni
    Salomone, Roberta
    Saija, Giuseppe
    Lanuzza, Francesco
    Gulotta, Teresa Maria
    MARITIME POLICY & MANAGEMENT, 2023, 50 (02) : 198 - 218
  • [43] An evaluation of railway passenger transport in Turkey using life cycle assessment and life cycle cost methods
    Banar, Mufide
    Ozdemir, Alp
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT, 2015, 41 : 88 - 105
  • [44] Sustainability Life Cycle Cost Analysis of Roof Waterproofing Methods Considering LCCO2
    Kim, Sangyong
    Kim, Gwang-Hee
    Lee, Young-Do
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2014, 6 (01): : 158 - 174
  • [45] Letter to the Editor – Life cycle sustainability assessment without a life cycle?
    Reinout Heijungs
    Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2023, 195
  • [46] Letter to the Editor - Life cycle sustainability assessment without a life cycle?
    Heijungs, Reinout
    ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2023, 195 (10)
  • [47] Life cycle sustainability assessment framework for water sector resource recovery solutions: Strengths and weaknesses
    Bhambhani, Anurag
    van der Hoek, Jan Peter
    Kapelan, Zoran
    RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2022, 180
  • [48] Life cycle inventory improvement in the pharmaceutical sector: assessment of the sustainability combining PMI and LCA tools
    Cespi, Daniele
    Beach, Evan S.
    Swarr, Thomas E.
    Passarini, Fabrizio
    Vassura, I.
    Dunn, Peter J.
    Anastas, Paul T.
    GREEN CHEMISTRY, 2015, 17 (06) : 3390 - 3400
  • [49] Sustainability and the life cycle concept: International and interdisciplinary perspectives
    Curran, MA
    James, SC
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRESS, 2003, 22 (04): : D15 - D16
  • [50] Sustainability performance assessment of the transport sector in European countries
    Gruetzmacher, Sarah B.
    Vaz, Clara B.
    Ferreira, Angela P.
    REVISTA FACULTAD DE INGENIERIA-UNIVERSIDAD DE ANTIOQUIA, 2022, (104): : 42 - 52