Sustainability Assessment Methods for the Transport Sector Considering the Life Cycle Concept-A Review

被引:1
|
作者
Burchart, Dorota [1 ]
Przytula, Iga [1 ]
机构
[1] Silesian Univ Tech, Fac Transport & Aviat Engn, Krasinskiego 8, PL-40019 Katowice, Poland
关键词
sustainable development; sustainable transport; multi-criteria decision analysis; life cycle sustainability assessment; ALTERNATIVE FUELS; SELECTION; VEHICLES; BIODIESEL; EMISSIONS; FRAMEWORK; OPTIONS; SYSTEM; GAS;
D O I
10.3390/su16188148
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper presents a summary and review of life cycle sustainability assessment (LCSA) methods for the transport sector. The paper provides a comprehensive overview of articles that employ a variety of methods for assessing sustainable development in the transport sector, taking into account the economic, social, and environmental dimensions. In the sustainability assessment of transport, three methods were evaluated: life cycle assessment (LCA), life cycle cost analysis (LCC), and social life cycle assessment (SLCA). An overview of sustainability assessment methods in transport and a review of the indicators used in the life cycle sustainability assessment was conducted. It was found that the selection of indicators within the LCSA for assessing various aspects of sustainable development is dependent on various geographic and policy contexts. An overview of the application of multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) methods to assess LCSA in the transport sector was performed. MCDA methods are used to support decision-making regarding the selection of the most sustainable transport options and allow for the simultaneous consideration of multiple criteria, enabling a more sustainable assessment of different transport options. MCDA methods help to rank alternative transportation fuels and help decision-makers consider indicators encompassing economic, environmental and social aspects.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] From LCA to Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment: concept, practice and future directions
    Alessandra Zamagni
    Hanna-Leena Pesonen
    Thomas Swarr
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2013, 18 : 1637 - 1641
  • [32] Life Cycle Assessment Approach to Attain Sustainability in the Waste Management Sector: A Case Study
    Bhave, Prashant P.
    Jain, Vibha
    Dhawad, Chetan
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2025, 151 (02)
  • [33] Life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle energy analysis (LCEA) of buildings and the building sector: A review
    Cabeza, Luisa F.
    Rincon, Lidia
    Vilarino, Virginia
    Perez, Gabriel
    Castell, Albert
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2014, 29 : 394 - 416
  • [34] The Mathematics of life cycle sustainability assessment
    Sadhukhan, Jhuma
    Sen, Sohum
    Gadkari, Siddharth
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 309
  • [35] Comparative Life Cycle Assessment in the plastic sector: A systematic literature review
    Marson, Alessandro
    Piron, Mirco
    Zuliani, Filippo
    Fedele, Andrea
    Manzardo, Alessandro
    CLEANER ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS, 2023, 9
  • [36] Life cycle assessment and circular practices in the woodworking sector: a systematic review
    van den Auwelant, Ewald
    Nimmegeers, Philippe
    Van Passel, Steven
    CLEAN TECHNOLOGIES AND ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY, 2024, : 1673 - 1692
  • [37] Life cycle sustainability assessment of fuels
    Zhou, Zupeng
    Jiang, Hua
    Qin, Liancheng
    FUEL, 2007, 86 (1-2) : 256 - 263
  • [38] Industry, life cycle assessment and sustainability
    Selmes, D
    Boron, S
    Murray, K
    1997 JUBILEE RESEARCH EVENT, VOLS 1 AND 2, 1997, : 153 - 156
  • [39] Life cycle Sustainability assessment of products
    Kloepffer, Walter
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2008, 13 (02): : 89 - 94
  • [40] A review of the life cycle assessment of electric vehicles: Considering the influence of batteries
    Xia, Xiaoning
    Li, Pengwei
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 814