Defining minimal clinically important difference, patient acceptable symptomatic state and substantial clinical benefit for the visual analog scale pain score after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair

被引:0
|
作者
Zeng, Gerald Joseph [1 ]
Moorthy, Vikaesh [1 ]
Hao, Ying [2 ]
Lie, Denny Tjiauw Tjoen [1 ]
机构
[1] Singapore Gen Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Outram Rd, Singapore 169608, Singapore
[2] Singhlth Hlth Serv Res Ctr HSRC, 20 Coll Rd,Acad,Discovery Tower,Level 6, Singapore 169856, Singapore
关键词
Rotator cuff; Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair; Prognostic factors; Shoulder function; TOTAL SHOULDER ARTHROPLASTY; ELBOW SURGEONS SCORE; IMPORTANT-IMPROVEMENT; QUANTIFYING SUCCESS; AMERICAN SHOULDER; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jisako.2024.05.003
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: Patient satisfaction after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR) is commonly assessed with patientreported outcome measures (PROMs), and there is an increased need to establish clinical relevance within these measures. The purpose of this study was to (1) define minimal clinically important difference (MCID), patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS), and substantial clinical benefit (SCB) for the visual analog scale (VAS) pain score in patients undergoing arthroscopic RCR, and (2) identify preoperative predictors of achieving each of these threshold values. Methods: Data from consecutive patients who underwent primary arthroscopic rotator cuff repair study between 2010 and 2016 were prospectively collected. Baseline data and VAS pain scores were collected preoperatively and at 1 year and 2 years postoperatively. MCID, PASS and SCB were determined using an anchor-based approach, with anchor questions assessing postoperative satisfaction and expectation fulfillment. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was also used to identify preoperative predictors for achieving MCID, PASS, and SCB. Results: A total of 286 patients were included in the final analysis, with an average age of 60.2 + 10.4 and the majority being female (61.2%). The values for the VAS pain score identified to represent MCID, PASS, and SCB, respectively, at 1-year postoperatively were: 5, 2, and 1. The rates of achieving clinically significant improvement based on VAS were 60.5%, 63.3%, and 57.2%, respectively. A higher preoperative VAS was predictive for achieving MCID (odds ratio [OR], 1.84; P < 0.01). Conclusion: This study identified threshold VAS pain scores of 5, 2, and 1 for achieving MCID, PASS, and SCB, respectively, at 1-year follow-up after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. A higher preoperative VAS pain score was also identified as a statistically significant predictor of attaining MCID after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.
引用
收藏
页码:592 / 597
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Establishing minimal clinically important difference for the UCLA and ASES scores after rotator cuff repair
    Malavolta, Eduardo A.
    Yamamoto, Gustavo J.
    Bussius, Daniel T.
    Assuncao, Jorge H.
    Andrade-Silva, Fernando B.
    Gracitelli, Mauro E. C.
    Ferreira Neto, Arnaldo A.
    ORTHOPAEDICS & TRAUMATOLOGY-SURGERY & RESEARCH, 2022, 108 (02)
  • [32] Defining the Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Patient-acceptable Symptom State Score for Disability Assessment in Surgical Patients
    Shulman, Mark A.
    Kasza, Jessica
    Myles, Paul S.
    ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2020, 132 (06) : 1362 - 1370
  • [33] Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Substantial Clinical Benefit After Revision Hip Arthroscopy
    Nwachukwu, Benedict U.
    Chang, Brenda
    Rotter, Ben-Zion
    Kelly, Bryan T.
    Ranawat, Anil S.
    Nawabi, Danyal H.
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2018, 34 (06): : 1862 - 1868
  • [34] Hip Arthroscopy Outcomes With Respect to Patient Acceptable Symptomatic State and Minimal Clinically Important Difference
    Levy, David M.
    Kuhns, Benjamin D.
    Chahal, Jaskarndip
    Philippon, Marc J.
    Kelly, Bryan T.
    Nho, Shane J.
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2016, 32 (09): : 1877 - 1886
  • [35] Minimal Clinically Important Difference, Substantial Clinical Benefit, and Patient Acceptable Symptom State of Outcome Measures Relating to Shoulder Pathology and Surgery: a Systematic Review
    Favian Su
    Sachin Allahabadi
    Dale N. Bongbong
    Brian T. Feeley
    Drew A. Lansdown
    Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine, 2021, 14 : 27 - 46
  • [36] Minimal Clinically Important Difference, Substantial Clinical Benefit, and Patient Acceptable Symptom State of Outcome Measures Relating to Shoulder Pathology and Surgery: a Systematic Review
    Su, Favian
    Allahabadi, Sachin
    Bongbong, Dale N.
    Feeley, Brian T.
    Lansdown, Drew A.
    CURRENT REVIEWS IN MUSCULOSKELETAL MEDICINE, 2021, 14 (01) : 27 - 46
  • [37] Establishing the Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Patient Acceptable Symptomatic State following Patellofemoral Inlay Arthroplasty for Visual Analog Scale Pain, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index, and Lysholm Scores
    Rupp, Marco-Christopher
    Khan, Zeeshan A.
    Dasari, Suhas P.
    Berthold, Daniel P.
    Siebenlist, Sebastian
    Imhoff, Andreas B.
    Chahla, Jorge
    Pogorzelski, Jonas
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2023, 38 (12): : 2580 - 2586
  • [38] Use of Area Deprivation Index to Predict Minimal Clinically Important Difference for Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair
    Shaikh, Hashim J. F.
    Anderson, Devon E.
    Chait, Alexander R.
    Ramirez, Gabriel
    Bronstein, Robert D.
    Goldblatt, John P.
    Giordano, Brian D.
    Maloney, Michael D.
    Nicandri, Gregg T.
    Voloshin, Ilya
    Mannava, Sandeep
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2023, 51 (11): : 2815 - 2823
  • [39] The Patient Acceptable Symptom State as a Predictor of the Sports Activity Available State After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair
    Kim, Dong Min
    Jeon, In-Ho
    Kim, Ho Yeon
    Park, Jeong Hee
    Kim, Hyojune
    Koh, Kyoung Hwan
    ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2022, 10 (03)
  • [40] Values derived from patient reported outcomes in spine surgery: a systematic review of the minimal clinically important difference, substantial clinical benefit, and patient acceptable symptom state
    Tariq Z. Issa
    Yunsoo Lee
    Tyler W. Henry
    Delano Trenchfield
    Gregory D. Schroeder
    Alexander R. Vaccaro
    Christopher K. Kepler
    European Spine Journal, 2023, 32 : 3333 - 3351