Defining minimal clinically important difference, patient acceptable symptomatic state and substantial clinical benefit for the visual analog scale pain score after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair

被引:0
|
作者
Zeng, Gerald Joseph [1 ]
Moorthy, Vikaesh [1 ]
Hao, Ying [2 ]
Lie, Denny Tjiauw Tjoen [1 ]
机构
[1] Singapore Gen Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Outram Rd, Singapore 169608, Singapore
[2] Singhlth Hlth Serv Res Ctr HSRC, 20 Coll Rd,Acad,Discovery Tower,Level 6, Singapore 169856, Singapore
关键词
Rotator cuff; Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair; Prognostic factors; Shoulder function; TOTAL SHOULDER ARTHROPLASTY; ELBOW SURGEONS SCORE; IMPORTANT-IMPROVEMENT; QUANTIFYING SUCCESS; AMERICAN SHOULDER; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jisako.2024.05.003
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: Patient satisfaction after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR) is commonly assessed with patientreported outcome measures (PROMs), and there is an increased need to establish clinical relevance within these measures. The purpose of this study was to (1) define minimal clinically important difference (MCID), patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS), and substantial clinical benefit (SCB) for the visual analog scale (VAS) pain score in patients undergoing arthroscopic RCR, and (2) identify preoperative predictors of achieving each of these threshold values. Methods: Data from consecutive patients who underwent primary arthroscopic rotator cuff repair study between 2010 and 2016 were prospectively collected. Baseline data and VAS pain scores were collected preoperatively and at 1 year and 2 years postoperatively. MCID, PASS and SCB were determined using an anchor-based approach, with anchor questions assessing postoperative satisfaction and expectation fulfillment. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was also used to identify preoperative predictors for achieving MCID, PASS, and SCB. Results: A total of 286 patients were included in the final analysis, with an average age of 60.2 + 10.4 and the majority being female (61.2%). The values for the VAS pain score identified to represent MCID, PASS, and SCB, respectively, at 1-year postoperatively were: 5, 2, and 1. The rates of achieving clinically significant improvement based on VAS were 60.5%, 63.3%, and 57.2%, respectively. A higher preoperative VAS was predictive for achieving MCID (odds ratio [OR], 1.84; P < 0.01). Conclusion: This study identified threshold VAS pain scores of 5, 2, and 1 for achieving MCID, PASS, and SCB, respectively, at 1-year follow-up after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. A higher preoperative VAS pain score was also identified as a statistically significant predictor of attaining MCID after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.
引用
收藏
页码:592 / 597
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Defining Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Patient Acceptable Symptom State After the Latarjet Procedure
    Menendez, Mariano E.
    Sudah, Suleiman Y.
    Cohn, Matthew R.
    Narbona, Pablo
    Ladermann, Alexandre
    Barth, Johannes
    Denard, Patrick J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2022, 50 (10): : 2761 - 2766
  • [22] Defining Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Patient Acceptable Symptom State After Isolated Endoscopic Gluteus Medius Repair
    Okoroha, Kelechi R.
    Beck, Edward C.
    Nwachukwu, Benedict U.
    Kunze, Kyle N.
    Nho, Shane J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2019, 47 (13): : 3141 - 3147
  • [23] Estimating the minimal clinically important difference of shoulder functional scores after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a prospective study
    Aditya A Mukadam
    Shalini Nayak
    Jaap Willems
    Vivek Pandey
    Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 2024, 144 : 1693 - 1701
  • [24] Estimating the minimal clinically important difference of shoulder functional scores after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a prospective study
    Mukadam, Aditya A.
    Nayak, Shalini
    Willems, Jaap
    Pandey, Vivek
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2024, 144 (04) : 1693 - 1701
  • [25] Minimal clinically important difference (MCID), substantial clinical benefit (SCB), and patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) of upper extremity PROMIS scores in idiopathic adhesive capsulitis
    Alben, Matthew G. G.
    Gambhir, Neil
    Shankar, Dhruv
    Gordon, Dan
    Zuckerman, Joseph D. D.
    Virk, Mandeep S. S.
    CLINICAL RHEUMATOLOGY, 2023, 42 (02) : 579 - 589
  • [26] Minimal clinically important difference (MCID), substantial clinical benefit (SCB), and patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) of upper extremity PROMIS scores in idiopathic adhesive capsulitis
    Matthew G. Alben
    Neil Gambhir
    Dhruv Shankar
    Dan Gordon
    Joseph D. Zuckerman
    Mandeep S. Virk
    Clinical Rheumatology, 2023, 42 : 579 - 589
  • [27] How Much Pain Is Significant? Defining the Minimal Clinically Important Difference for the Visual Analog Scale for Pain After Total Joint Arthroplasty
    Danoff, Jonathan R.
    Goel, Rahul
    Sutton, Ryan
    Maltenfort, Mitchell G.
    Austin, Matthew S.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2018, 33 (07): : S71 - +
  • [28] Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Patient Acceptable Symptom State for the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index in Patients Who Underwent Rotator Cuff Tear Repair
    Longo, Umile Giuseppe
    Berton, Alessandra
    De Salvatore, Sergio
    Piergentili, Ilaria
    Casciani, Erica
    Faldetta, Aurora
    De Marinis, Maria Grazia
    Denaro, Vincenzo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 18 (16)
  • [29] Preoperative patient- reported outcome measures predict minimal clinically important difference and patient- acceptable symptomatic state following arthroscopic Bankart repair
    Long, Y.
    Zheng, Z-z.
    Li, X-h.
    Cui, D-d.
    Deng, X-h.
    Guo, J.
    Yang, R.
    BONE & JOINT JOURNAL, 2024, 106B (10): : 1118 - 1124
  • [30] Time Required to Achieve Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Substantial Clinical Benefit After Arthroscopic Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement
    Nwachukwu, Benedict U.
    Chang, Brenda
    Adjei, Joshua
    Schairer, William W.
    Ranawat, Anil S.
    Kelly, Bryan T.
    Nawabi, Danyal H.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2018, 46 (11): : 2601 - 2606