Evaluating the Sustainability of Sugar Beet Production Using Life Cycle Assessment Approach

被引:0
|
作者
Azizpanah, Amir [1 ]
Taki, Morteza [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ilam, Coll Agr, Dept Mech Biosyst, Ilam, Iran
[2] Agr Sci & Nat Resources Univ Khuzestan, Fac Agr Engn & Rural Dev, Dept Agr Machinery & Mechanizat Engn, Mollasani, Iran
关键词
Energy efficiency; Sustainability; Production cost; Cobb-Douglas model; ENERGY-USE EFFICIENCY; ECONOMIC-ANALYSIS; WHEAT; FRUIT;
D O I
10.1007/s12355-024-01488-9
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
This study aimed to investigate the energy consumption and Global Warming Potential (GWP) of sugar beet production in Cherdavel (33.7018 degrees N, 47.0194 degrees E in Ilam province) and Islamabad (34.1132 degrees N, 46.5279 degrees E in Kermanshah province), Iran. Data were collected through detailed questionnaires and in-depth interviews with farmers. Environmental impacts were assessed using the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) approach, which evaluates the environmental effects throughout its entire life cycle, from raw material extraction to disposal. The CML-IA baseline V3.08/EU25 method was used for this assessment, providing a standardized framework for impact categories such as global warming, abiotic depletion, and toxicity. The results indicated that energy consumption for sugar beet production in Cherdavel and Islamabad regions was 55,308.42 and 54,871.22 MJha-1, respectively. The energy efficiency index was calculated as 17.01 and 14.69 for Cherdavel and Islamabad, respectively. The economic analysis showed that in Cherdavel and Islamabad, the profit-to-cost ratio was 2.05 and 1.89, and the economic productivity of production was 11.41 and 10.53 kg$-1, respectively. The results of modeling with the Cobb-Douglas function, a common econometric model used to represent the relationship between inputs and outputs, showed that the coefficient of determination (R2) in Cherdavel and Islamabad regions was 0.93 and 0.96, respectively. This high R2 value indicates a strong correlation between the input variables and the output (sugar beet yield), suggesting that the model accurately represents the production process. The results showed that Global Warming Potential (GWP) in Cherdavel and Islamabad was 54.05 and 44.47 (kg CO2eq) per ton of sugar beet production, respectively. These values are relatively high compared to other crops, indicating significant greenhouse gas emissions associated with sugar beet production in these regions. Abiotic Depletion for Fossil fuels (ADF) was 435.69 and 363.19 MJ, Human Toxicity (HT) was 21.53 and 16.87 (1,4-DB eq kg), and Marine Aquatic Ecotoxicity (MAE) was 23,543.82 and 18,306.06 (1,4-DB eq kg) in Cherdavel and Islamabad, respectively. These metrics highlight the substantial environmental impacts of sugar beet production with Cherdavel showing higher values in most categories. Despite these environmental concerns, both regions demonstrated favorable economic productivity and profit-to-cost ratios, suggesting that sugar beet production remains economically viable.
引用
收藏
页码:78 / 93
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Introduction to evaluating energy justice across the life cycle: A social life cycle assessment approach
    Fortier, Marie-Odile P.
    Teron, Lemir
    Reames, Tony G.
    Munardy, Dynta Trishana
    Sullivan, Breck M.
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2019, 236 : 211 - 219
  • [42] Evaluating sustainability impacts of critical mineral extractions: Integration of life cycle sustainability assessment and SDGs frameworks
    Agusdinata, Datu Buyung
    Liu, Wenjuan
    Sulistyo, Sinta
    LeBillon, Philippe
    Wegner, Je'anne
    JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2023, 27 (03) : 746 - 759
  • [43] The Design of a Sustainability Assessment Standard Using Life Cycle Information
    Lu, Di
    Realff, Matthew J.
    JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2013, 17 (04) : 493 - 503
  • [44] Study on Life Cycle Assessment and Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment of Buildings: A Review
    Basu, Manali
    Kaja, Nagaraju
    Rao, Prashanti
    Journal of The Institution of Engineers (India): Series A, 2024, 105 (03) : 749 - 766
  • [45] Assessment of Sustainability and Efficiency Metrics in Modern Methods of Construction: A Case Study Using a Life Cycle Assessment Approach
    Hernandez, Hector
    Ossio, Felipe
    Silva, Michael
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (07)
  • [46] Decision Making for Social Sustainability: A Life-Cycle Assessment Approach
    Hutchins, Margot J.
    Gierke, John S.
    Sutherland, John W.
    2009 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON TECHNOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2009, : 39 - +
  • [47] Drivers of Environmental Sustainability in the Wine Industry: A Life Cycle Assessment Approach
    Guerra, Mariana
    Ferreira, Fatima
    Oliveira, Ana Alexandra
    Pinto, Teresa
    Teixeira, Carlos A.
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 16 (13)
  • [48] Integrated life cycle sustainability assessment - A practical approach applied to biorefineries
    Keller, Heiko
    Rettenmaier, Nils
    Reinhardt, Guido Andreas
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2015, 154 : 1072 - 1081
  • [49] Life cycle approach to sustainability assessment: a case study of remanufactured alternators
    Erwin M Schau
    Marzia Traverso
    Matthias Finkbeiner
    Journal of Remanufacturing, 2 (1)
  • [50] Evaluating the environmental performance of mezcal production in Michoacán, México: A life cycle assessment approach
    Ruiz-Camou, Cesar
    Nunez, Jose
    Musule, Ricardo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2023, 28 (12): : 1658 - 1671