Assessment of Sustainability and Efficiency Metrics in Modern Methods of Construction: A Case Study Using a Life Cycle Assessment Approach

被引:8
|
作者
Hernandez, Hector [1 ]
Ossio, Felipe [1 ]
Silva, Michael [2 ]
机构
[1] Pontificia Univ Catolica Chile, Escuela Construcc Civil, Fac Ingn, Casilla 306,Correo 22, Santiago 8331150, Chile
[2] Univ Cent Chile, Escuela Ingn, Fac Ingn & Arquitectura, Ave Santa Isabel 1186, Santiago 8370178, Chile
关键词
life-cycle assessment (LCA); building material circularity; modern methods of construction (MMC); embodied energy (EE); embodied carbon (EC); construction waste; masonry; labor-productivity; off-site construction (OSC); global warming potential (GWP); RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS; CIRCULAR ECONOMY; EMBODIED ENERGY; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS; CO2; EMISSIONS; CHALLENGES; SECTOR; LCA; REFURBISHMENT; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.3390/su15076267
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The construction industry faces various sustainability challenges, and modern methods of construction (MMC) have been promoted as an effective alternative to mitigate environmental impact and improve productivity. However, to gain a thorough understanding of the benefits, there is a need for more objective data. To address this, the present study employs a simplified life-cycle assessment (LCA) methodology to evaluate a set of environmental and efficiency metrics in a case study. The study aims to demonstrate the benefits of using an MMC known as the "VAP system" by comparing it with its conventional counterpart built with reinforced masonry. Adopting the MMC resulted in significant reductions in embodied carbon (EC) and embodied energy (EE) related to materials, as well as a reduction in global warming potential (GWP), cumulative energy demand (CED), and construction waste. Additionally, it shortened delivery times and increased labor productivity. Furthermore, when both local and European parameters were considered in the evaluation, the percentage of materials circularity (PMC) was higher. The study concludes that the adoption of the MMC leads to higher sustainability by reducing carbon emissions, minimizing construction waste, and conserving resources. This research has significant implications for promoting the adoption of MMC globally, leading to more sustainable and efficient construction practices.
引用
收藏
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment of Building Construction: A Case Study in China
    Dong, Yahong
    Liu, Peng
    Hossain, Md. Uzzal
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (09)
  • [2] Life cycle approach to sustainability assessment: a case study of remanufactured alternators
    Erwin M Schau
    Marzia Traverso
    Matthias Finkbeiner
    Journal of Remanufacturing, 2 (1)
  • [3] Sustainability assessment of gas based power generation using a life cycle assessment approach: A case study from India
    Shah, Binita
    Unnikrishnan, Seema
    MANAGEMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2018, 29 (05) : 826 - 841
  • [4] Assessment of building materials in the construction sector: A case study using life cycle assessment approach to achieve the circular economy
    Dsilva, Jacinta
    Zarmukhambetova, Saniya
    Locke, Jasmina
    HELIYON, 2023, 9 (10)
  • [5] Using counterintuitive sustainability examples in teaching life cycle assessment: A case study
    Hicks, Andrea
    RESOURCES CONSERVATION & RECYCLING ADVANCES, 2023, 19
  • [6] Study on Life Cycle Assessment and Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment of Buildings: A Review
    Basu, Manali
    Kaja, Nagaraju
    Rao, Prashanti
    Journal of The Institution of Engineers (India): Series A, 2024, 105 (03) : 749 - 766
  • [7] Life Cycle Assessment Approach to Attain Sustainability in the Waste Management Sector: A Case Study
    Bhave, Prashant P.
    Jain, Vibha
    Dhawad, Chetan
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2025, 151 (02)
  • [8] Life cycle sustainability assessment as a metrics towards SDGs 2030
    Backes, Jana Gerta
    Traverso, Marzia
    CURRENT OPINION IN GREEN AND SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY, 2022, 38
  • [9] Sustainability Metrics: Life Cycle Assessment and Green Design in Polymers
    Tabone, Michaelangelo D.
    Cregg, James J.
    Beckman, Eric J.
    Landis, Amy E.
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 44 (21) : 8264 - 8269
  • [10] THE APPROACH OF LIFE CYCLE SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENT OF BIOREFINERIES
    Jungmeier, G.
    Hingsamer, M.
    Steiner, D.
    Kaltenegger, I.
    Kleinegris, D.
    Van Ree, R.
    de Jong, E.
    PAPERS OF THE 24TH EUROPEAN BIOMASS CONFERENCE: SETTING THE COURSE FOR A BIOBASED ECONOMY, 2016, : 1660 - 1665