Life cycle environmental trade-off of decarbonising UK industrial clusters - A cradle to gate approach

被引:0
|
作者
Cooper, Jasmin [1 ]
Hawkes, Adam [1 ]
机构
[1] Imperial Coll London, Dept Chem Engn, London SW7 2AZ, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Life cycle assessment; Decarbonisation; Industrial clusters; Environmental sustainability; Environmental impacts; AMMONIA PRODUCTION; HYDROGEN; STORAGE; CAPTURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.176101
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The industrial sector is a major source of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions due to process emissions and a heavy reliance on fossil fuels for heat and power. Methods exist to produce low carbon versions of products made in industrial clusters, including hydrogen, carbon capture and storage and alternative production methods, but these could increase burdens to other areas of the environment, such as resource depletion and water scarcity. This study compares different decarbonisation pathways for ammonia, cement, methanol and steel produced in the UK, to determine whether decarbonising could result in unintended environmental consequences. To determine this, life cycle assessment was applied to compare 267 different pathways to the conventional (fossil fuel) baseline. We find that most pathways lead to GHG emission reductions (43 to 78 % on average) but would increase impacts to other areas of the environment, including metal resources and ecotoxicity (8 % to 5-fold and 19 % to 24-fold, on average respectively). This study is the first to assess decarbonisation pathways for unintended environmental impacts and is of interest to industry, policy makers and anyone modelling industrial lifecycle emissions.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Optimization of environmental impacts of construction projects: a time-cost-quality trade-off approach
    Banihashemi, S. A.
    Khalilzadeh, Mohammad
    Shahraki, A.
    Malkhalifeh, M. Rostami
    Ahmadizadeh, S. S. R.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 18 (03) : 631 - 646
  • [42] Comparative life cycle assessment of different vacuum insulation panel core materials using a cradle to gate approach
    Resalati, Shahaboddin
    Okoroafor, Tobechi
    Henshall, Paul
    Simoes, Nuno
    Goncalves, Marcio
    Alam, Mahmood
    BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 188 (188)
  • [43] WHAT IS THE RELATIVE VALUE OF CARER AND PATIENT QUALITY OF LIFE? A PERSON TRADE-OFF (PTO) STUDY WITH THE UK PUBLIC
    Al-Janabi, H.
    Wittenberg, E.
    Donaldson, C.
    Brouwer, W.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2020, 23 : S758 - S759
  • [44] Life Cycle Assessment of Calcium-Rich Industrial Waste Reinforced Polypropylene and Low-Density Polyethylene Composites Using the Cradle-to-Gate Approach
    Bakshi, Payal
    Pappu, Asokan
    Bharti, Dhiraj Kumar
    Parmar, Beerbal
    Patidar, Ravi
    Srivastava, Avanish Kumar
    ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING, 2022, 10 (41) : 13710 - 13721
  • [45] A hybrid choice modelling approach to estimate the trade-off between perceived environmental risks and economic benefits
    Strazzera, Elisabetta
    Meleddu, Daniela
    Atzori, Rossella
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2022, 196
  • [46] Comparative Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of Porous Asphalt Mixtures with Sustainable and Recycled Materials: A Cradle-to-Gate Approach
    De Pascale, Beatrice
    Tataranni, Piergiorgio
    Bonoli, Alessandra
    Lantieri, Claudio
    MATERIALS, 2023, 16 (19)
  • [47] Differential survival throughout the full annual cycle of a migratory bird presents a life-history trade-off
    Buechley, Evan R.
    Oppel, Steffen
    Efrat, Ron
    Phipps, W. Louis
    Carbonell Alanis, Isidoro
    Alvarez, Ernesto
    Andreotti, Alessandro
    Arkumarev, Volen
    Berger-Tal, Oded
    Bermejo Bermejo, Ana
    Bounas, Anastasios
    Ceccolini, Guido
    Cenerini, Anna
    Dobrev, Vladimir
    Duriez, Olivier
    Garcia, Javier
    Garcia-Ripolles, Clara
    Galan, Manuel
    Gil, Alberto
    Giraud, Lea
    Hatzofe, Ohad
    Iglesias-Lebrija, Juan Jose
    Karyakin, Igor
    Kobierzycki, Erik
    Kret, Elzbieta
    Loercher, Franziska
    Lopez-Lopez, Pascual
    Miller, Ygal
    Mueller, Thomas
    Nikolov, Stoyan C.
    de la Puente, Javier
    Sapir, Nir
    Saravia, Victoria
    Sekercioglu, Cagan H.
    Sillett, T. Scott
    Tavares, Jose
    Urios, Vicente
    Marra, Peter P.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL ECOLOGY, 2021, 90 (05) : 1228 - 1238
  • [48] Life cycle assessment of biological pig manure treatment versus direct land application - a trade-off story
    Corbala-Robles, L.
    Sastafiana, W. N. D.
    Van Linden, V.
    Volcke, E. I. P.
    Schaubroeck, T.
    RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2018, 131 : 86 - 98
  • [49] Potential trade-off between water consumption and water quality: life cycle assessment of nonaqueous solvent dyeing
    Zhang, Yi
    Guo, Shengcai
    Gong, Yan
    Wang, Lei
    WATER RESEARCH, 2022, 215
  • [50] Environmental life cycle assessment of Finnish beef - cradle-to-farm gate analysis of dairy and beef breed beef production
    Hietala, Sanna
    Heusala, Hannele
    Katajajuuri, Juha-Matti
    Jarvenranta, Kirsi
    Virkajarvi, Perttu
    Huuskonen, Arto
    Nousiainen, Jouni
    AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2021, 194