Life cycle assessment of greenhouse gas emissions and carbon mitigation methods in probiotic-fed broiler production

被引:0
|
作者
Chin, H. W. [1 ]
Tee, T. P. [1 ]
Tan, N. P. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Putra Malaysia, Fac Agr, Dept Anim Sci, Upm Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia
[2] Univ Putra Malaysia, Fac Agr, Dept Land Management, Upm Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia
关键词
biochar; emission intensity; greenhouse gas emission; life cycle assessment; Malaysia; mitigation; poultry manure; probiotic-fed broiler; CLIMATE-CHANGE; POULTRY; LIVESTOCK; NITROGEN; BIOCHAR; PERFORMANCE; AMMONIA; PHOSPHORUS; RUMINANTS;
D O I
10.1071/AN24040
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Context Livestock production contributes significantly to global anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions. Probiotic-fed broiler production has been shown to reduce greenhouse emissions in other nations significantly, however, outcomes in Malaysia are unknown.Aims This study assesses the total greenhouse emissions of probiotic-fed broiler production from cradle to farm-gate using an accredited Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) tool, Greenhouse Accounting Framework (GAF). It determines the hotspot of greenhouse emissions and emission intensity of the farm in kg CO2-eq/kg liveweight. Three types of mitigation methods, i.e. selling untreated manure, composting, and conversion into biochar, were compared to identify their effectiveness.Methods The research involves three broiler houses with one production cycle. Fifty-four gas samples and 90 poultry litter samples were collected throughout the production cycle and analysed for the targeted gases - i.e. carbon dioxide, methane, nitrogen and volatile solid composition. Analysis results were used to estimate total greenhouse emissions from the farm using the LCA-GAF model. The mitigation efficiency achieved by selling untreated manure, composting, and biochar production is assessed by estimating the carbon stock mass.Key results A new LCA model based on probiotic-fed broiler production was generated, specifically using data obtained from the experiment. The experimental results indicated that energy consumption, i.e. electricity and fuel, have the highest greenhouse emissions (44%), followed by feed production with 40% of the total 53.51 t CO2-eq/house/cycle in the probiotic-fed broiler farm. The emissions intensity of the farm is 1.57 kg CO2-eq/kg liveweight. Estimates of the mitigation efficiency were compared among untreated manure, biochar, and compost.Conclusions Energy consumption, particularly electricity and fuel, contributed the highest greenhouse emissions in the probiotic-fed broiler production. The strategy of selling untreated poultry litter was the most effective carbon mitigation method. However, due to its adverse environmental and human health impacts, converting poultry litter into biochar is the preferable mitigation option.Implications This study is profound for the poultry industry and environmental sustainability. It highlights the crucial role of energy consumption in greenhouse emissions from the probiotic-fed broiler farm, and the necessity of addressing the environmental impacts. Implementing sustainable agricultural practices could lead to more ecological poultry production, contributing to global efforts in climate change mitigation. Livestock production plays a major role in global greenhouse gas emissions, and the impacts of using probiotics in broiler production is a new area of study in Malaysia. This research conducted on three broiler farms, reveals that energy consumption, particularly electricity and fuel, contributes significantly to greenhouse gas emissions. The findings highlight the potential of probiotics in reducing greenhouse gas emissions in broiler production and developing sustainable practices in the poultry industry to address environmental concerns.This article belongs to the Collection Sustainable Animal Agriculture for Developing Countries 2023.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Life cycle assessment of shared electric bicycle on greenhouse gas emissions in China
    Zhu, Zhen
    Lu, Chuntian
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 860
  • [32] Life Cycle Assessment of Technologies for Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reduction in Sugarcane Biorefineries
    Chagas, Mateus F.
    Cavalett, Otavio
    Klein, Bruno C.
    Maciel Filho, Rubens
    Bonomi, Antonio
    2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIOMASS (ICONBM 2016), 2016, 50 : 421 - 426
  • [33] Life cycle assessment of lithium-ion batteries for greenhouse gas emissions
    Liang, Yuhan
    Su, Jing
    Xi, Beidou
    Yu, Yajuan
    Ji, Danfeng
    Sun, Yuanyuan
    Cui, Chifei
    Zhu, Jianchao
    RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2017, 117 : 285 - 293
  • [34] Reducing greenhouse gas emissions with urban agriculture: A Life Cycle Assessment perspective
    Kulak, Michal
    Graves, Anil
    Chatterton, Julia
    LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2013, 111 : 68 - 78
  • [35] Life cycle assessment of greenhouse gas mitigation of production and use of bio-methane: sensitivity of effects from N2O emissions
    Arnold, Karin
    JOURNAL OF INTEGRATIVE ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES, 2010, 7 : 257 - 267
  • [36] Assessing life cycle greenhouse gas emissions in the Norwegian defence sector for climate change mitigation
    Sparrevik, Magnus
    Utstol, Simon
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 248 (248)
  • [37] Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of China shale gas
    Li, Xi
    Mao, Hongmin
    Ma, Yongsong
    Wang, Bing
    Liu, Wenshi
    Xu, Wenjia
    RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2020, 152
  • [38] Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of Marcellus shale gas
    Jiang, Mohan
    Griffin, W. Michael
    Hendrickson, Chris
    Jaramillo, Paulina
    VanBriesen, Jeanne
    Venkatesh, Aranya
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2011, 6 (03):
  • [39] Estimation of greenhouse gas emissions from ferroalloy production using life cycle assessment with particular reference to Australia
    Haque, Nawshad
    Norgate, Terry
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2013, 39 : 220 - 230
  • [40] Integrated Phosgene and Steel Production: Combining Process Optimization and Life Cycle Assessment to Minimize Greenhouse Gas Emissions
    Eichwald, Stefan
    Polte, Lukas
    Hense, Janik
    Nilges, Benedikt
    Jupke, Andreas
    von der Assen, Niklas
    CHEMIE INGENIEUR TECHNIK, 2024, 96 (09) : 1256 - 1267