Life cycle assessment of greenhouse gas emissions and carbon mitigation methods in probiotic-fed broiler production

被引:0
|
作者
Chin, H. W. [1 ]
Tee, T. P. [1 ]
Tan, N. P. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Putra Malaysia, Fac Agr, Dept Anim Sci, Upm Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia
[2] Univ Putra Malaysia, Fac Agr, Dept Land Management, Upm Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia
关键词
biochar; emission intensity; greenhouse gas emission; life cycle assessment; Malaysia; mitigation; poultry manure; probiotic-fed broiler; CLIMATE-CHANGE; POULTRY; LIVESTOCK; NITROGEN; BIOCHAR; PERFORMANCE; AMMONIA; PHOSPHORUS; RUMINANTS;
D O I
10.1071/AN24040
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Context Livestock production contributes significantly to global anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions. Probiotic-fed broiler production has been shown to reduce greenhouse emissions in other nations significantly, however, outcomes in Malaysia are unknown.Aims This study assesses the total greenhouse emissions of probiotic-fed broiler production from cradle to farm-gate using an accredited Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) tool, Greenhouse Accounting Framework (GAF). It determines the hotspot of greenhouse emissions and emission intensity of the farm in kg CO2-eq/kg liveweight. Three types of mitigation methods, i.e. selling untreated manure, composting, and conversion into biochar, were compared to identify their effectiveness.Methods The research involves three broiler houses with one production cycle. Fifty-four gas samples and 90 poultry litter samples were collected throughout the production cycle and analysed for the targeted gases - i.e. carbon dioxide, methane, nitrogen and volatile solid composition. Analysis results were used to estimate total greenhouse emissions from the farm using the LCA-GAF model. The mitigation efficiency achieved by selling untreated manure, composting, and biochar production is assessed by estimating the carbon stock mass.Key results A new LCA model based on probiotic-fed broiler production was generated, specifically using data obtained from the experiment. The experimental results indicated that energy consumption, i.e. electricity and fuel, have the highest greenhouse emissions (44%), followed by feed production with 40% of the total 53.51 t CO2-eq/house/cycle in the probiotic-fed broiler farm. The emissions intensity of the farm is 1.57 kg CO2-eq/kg liveweight. Estimates of the mitigation efficiency were compared among untreated manure, biochar, and compost.Conclusions Energy consumption, particularly electricity and fuel, contributed the highest greenhouse emissions in the probiotic-fed broiler production. The strategy of selling untreated poultry litter was the most effective carbon mitigation method. However, due to its adverse environmental and human health impacts, converting poultry litter into biochar is the preferable mitigation option.Implications This study is profound for the poultry industry and environmental sustainability. It highlights the crucial role of energy consumption in greenhouse emissions from the probiotic-fed broiler farm, and the necessity of addressing the environmental impacts. Implementing sustainable agricultural practices could lead to more ecological poultry production, contributing to global efforts in climate change mitigation. Livestock production plays a major role in global greenhouse gas emissions, and the impacts of using probiotics in broiler production is a new area of study in Malaysia. This research conducted on three broiler farms, reveals that energy consumption, particularly electricity and fuel, contributes significantly to greenhouse gas emissions. The findings highlight the potential of probiotics in reducing greenhouse gas emissions in broiler production and developing sustainable practices in the poultry industry to address environmental concerns.This article belongs to the Collection Sustainable Animal Agriculture for Developing Countries 2023.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Greenhouse gas mitigation in animal production: towards an integrated life cycle sustainability assessment
    de Boer, I. J. M.
    Cederberg, C.
    Eady, S.
    Gollnow, S.
    Kristensen, T.
    Macleod, M.
    Meul, M.
    Nemecek, T.
    Phong, L. T.
    Thoma, G.
    van der Werf, H. M. G.
    Williams, A. G.
    Zonderland-Thomassen, M. A.
    CURRENT OPINION IN ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2011, 3 (05) : 423 - 431
  • [2] Life Cycle Assessment of Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Recycled Asphalt Pavement Production
    Gruber, Michael R.
    Hofko, Bernhard
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (05)
  • [3] Greenhouse gas emissions from life cycle assessment of Norwegian food production systems
    Refsgaard, K.
    Bergsdal, H.
    Berglann, H.
    Pettersen, J.
    ACTA AGRICULTURAE SCANDINAVICA SECTION A-ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2012, 62 (04): : 336 - 346
  • [4] Life Cycle Assessment from Cradle-to-Handover Approach to Greenhouse Gas Emissions Mitigation: Carbon Storage in Timber Buildings
    Di Ruocco, Giacomo
    Gaita, Angela
    BUILDINGS, 2023, 13 (07)
  • [5] Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions in California rice production
    Brodt, Sonja
    Kendall, Alissa
    Moharnmadi, Yaser
    Arslan, Aslihan
    Yuan, Juhong
    Lee, In-Sung
    Linquist, Bruce
    FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 2014, 169 : 89 - 98
  • [6] Assessment of the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions in the food industry
    Moresi, Mauro
    AGRO FOOD INDUSTRY HI-TECH, 2014, 25 (03): : 53 - 62
  • [7] Mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions from beef production in western Canada - Evaluation using farm-based life cycle assessment
    Beauchemin, K. A.
    Janzen, H. H.
    Little, S. M.
    McAllister, T. A.
    McGinn, S. M.
    ANIMAL FEED SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 166-67 : 663 - 677
  • [8] Life cycle assessment (LCA) for greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from microalgae biodiesel production
    Woertz, Ian
    Du, Niu
    Rhodes, James
    Mendola, Dominick
    Mitchell, Greg
    Lundquist, Tryg
    Benemann, John
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2012, 243
  • [9] Life Cycle Assessment of fossil energy use and greenhouse gas emissions in Chinese pear production
    Liu, Yuexian
    Langer, Vibeke
    Hogh-Jensen, Henning
    Egelyng, Henrik
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2010, 18 (14) : 1423 - 1430
  • [10] LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT OF GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS ASSOCIATED WITH PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION OF PEANUT BUTTER IN THE US
    McCarty, J. A.
    Sandefur, H. N.
    Matlock, M.
    Thoma, G.
    Kim, D.
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASABE, 2014, 57 (06) : 1741 - 1750