Decoding machine learning in nursing research: A scoping review of effective algorithms

被引:0
|
作者
Choi, Jeeyae [1 ]
Lee, Hanjoo [2 ]
Kim-Godwin, Yeounsoo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ North Carolina Wilmington, Coll Hlth & Human Serv, Sch Nursing, 601 South Coll Rd, Wilmington, NC 28403 USA
[2] Univ North Carolina Chapel Hill, Sch Med, Joint Biomed Engn Dept, Chapel Hill, NC USA
关键词
artificial intelligence; machine learning; machine learning algorithms; performance validation; scoping review; MEDICAL-EDUCATION-RESEARCH; HEALTH-CARE; ARTIFICIAL-INTELLIGENCE; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1111/jnu.13026
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Introduction: The rapid evolution of artificial intelligence (AI) technology has revolutionized healthcare, particularly through the integration of AI into health information systems. This transformation has significantly impacted the roles of nurses and nurse practitioners, prompting extensive research to assess the effectiveness of AI-integrated systems. This scoping review focuses on machine learning (ML) used in nursing, specifically investigating ML algorithms, model evaluation methods, areas of focus related to nursing, and the most effective ML algorithms. Design: The scoping review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. Methods: A structured search was performed across seven databases according to PRISMA-ScR: PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, OVID, PsycINFO, and ProQuest. The quality of the final reviewed studies was assessed using the Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument (MERSQI). Results: Twenty-six articles published between 2019 and 2023 met the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and 46% of studies were conducted in the US. The average MERSQI score was 12.2, indicative of moderate- to high-quality studies. The most used ML algorithm was Random Forest. The four second-most used were logistic regression, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator, decision tree, and support vector machine. Most ML models were evaluated by calculating sensitivity (recall)/specificity, accuracy, receiver operating characteristic (ROC), area under the ROC (AUROC), and positive/negative prediction value (precision). Half of the studies focused on nursing staff or students and hospital readmission or emergency department visits. Only 11 articles reported the most effective ML algorithm(s). Conclusion:The scoping review provides insights into the current status of ML research in nursing and recognition of its significance in nursing research, confirming the benefits of ML in healthcare. Recommendations include incorporating experimental designs in research studies to optimize the use of ML models across various nursing domains.
引用
收藏
页码:119 / 129
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Predicting Violent Extremism with Machine Learning: A Scoping Review
    Richardson M.-A.
    SN Computer Science, 5 (1)
  • [42] Multimodal machine learning in precision health: A scoping review
    Kline, Adrienne
    Wang, Hanyin
    Li, Yikuan
    Dennis, Saya
    Hutch, Meghan
    Xu, Zhenxing
    Wang, Fei
    Cheng, Feixiong
    Luo, Yuan
    NPJ DIGITAL MEDICINE, 2022, 5 (01)
  • [43] Machine learning in female urinary incontinence: A scoping review
    Wang, Qi
    Wang, Xiaoxiao
    Jiang, Xiaoxiang
    Lin, Chaoqin
    DIGITAL HEALTH, 2024, 10
  • [44] Machine learning in healthcare citizen science: A scoping review
    Baminiwatte, Ranga
    Torsu, Blessing
    Scherbakov, Dmitry
    Mollalo, Abolfazl
    Obeid, Jihad S.
    Alekseyenko, Alexander V.
    Lenert, Leslie A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2025, 195
  • [45] The use of machine learning in rare diseases: a scoping review
    Julia Schaefer
    Moritz Lehne
    Josef Schepers
    Fabian Prasser
    Sylvia Thun
    Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, 15
  • [46] Learning Outcomes of the Observer Role in Nursing Simulation: A Scoping Review
    Rogers, Beth
    Baker, Kathy A.
    Franklin, Ashley E.
    CLINICAL SIMULATION IN NURSING, 2020, 49 : 81 - 89
  • [47] Team-based learning in nursing education: A scoping review
    Considine, Julie
    Berry, Debra
    Allen, Joshua
    Hewitt, Nicky
    Oldland, Elizabeth
    Sprogis, Stephanie K.
    Currey, Judy
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2021, 30 (7-8) : 903 - 917
  • [48] RN-to-BS Nursing Education Research: A Scoping Review
    Ringhofer Brown, Cindy
    Elliott, Brenda
    Gipson, Christine S.
    Holmstrom, Jill
    Stallings, Devita
    NURSING EDUCATION PERSPECTIVES, 2024, 45 (04) : 219 - 224
  • [49] Research capacity in nursing: a concept analysis based on a scoping review
    Chen, Qirong
    Sun, Mei
    Tang, Siyuan
    Castro, Aimee R.
    BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (11):
  • [50] Blending Adaptive Learning Technology Into Nursing Education: A Scoping Review
    Andersen, Bjarke Lindso
    Jorno, Rasmus Leth
    Nortvig, Anne-Mette
    CONTEMPORARY EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 14 (01)