Prevalence of clinically significant prostate carcinoma in Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PIRADS) 3 lesions detected in the peripheral zone on biparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)da local experience

被引:0
|
作者
Khalid, M. J. [1 ]
Parker, P. [1 ]
Smith, S. [1 ]
Byass, O. R. [1 ]
Cast, J. E. I. [1 ]
机构
[1] Hull Univ Teaching Hosp NHS Trust, Dept Radiol, Kingston Upon Hull, England
关键词
CANCER; MRI;
D O I
10.1016/j.crad.2024.07.014
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
AIM: The aim of this study was to determine whether biparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is effective in the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer in prostate peripheral zone Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PIRADS) 3 lesions without the use of dynamic contrast enhancement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who underwent biparametric MRI over a 12-month period from January 2022 to December 2022 and were diagnosed with PIRADS 3 lesion in the peripheral zone were included in the study. No patient received dynamic contrast enhancement. Histological analysis was done after performing local anesthetic transperineal biopsy to determine detection rate of clinically significant prostate cancer. Prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD) and biopsy complication rates were also reviewed. RESULTS: Sixty-one out of 688 MRIs (8.8%) performed over the study period had a PIRADS 3 lesion in the peripheral zone where contrast is supposed to add value. Fifty-eight of the 61 went ahead to biopsy, and csPCa (Gleason score: >= 3 + 4, with a max core length of >= 6 mm and above) was diagnosed in 17%. Among those diagnosed with csPCa, 80% had a PSAD of >= 0.15 ng/ ml/cc. No postbiopsy complications were reported. CONCLUSION: Biparametric MRI without contrast offers a reliable alternative to multi- parametric MRI with minimum or neglible impact on clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) diagnosis in peripheral zone PIRADS 3 lesions, especially when used in conjunction with other factors such as PSAD. There is potential to address health economics and patient burden in prostate cancer investigation. (c) 2024 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.
引用
收藏
页码:773 / 780
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A nomogram based on biparametric magnetic resonance imaging for detection of clinically significant prostate cancer in biopsy-naive patients
    Hu, Beibei
    Zhang, Huili
    Zhang, Yueyue
    Jin, Yongming
    CANCER IMAGING, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [42] Predictive ability of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for detecting prostate cancer and its clinical significance in MRI-targeted biopsy for prostate imaging reporting and data system (PI-RADS) ≥3 lesions
    Erkan, A.
    Ozcan, S. G. Gur
    Erkan, M.
    Barali, D.
    Koc, A.
    CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2025, 80
  • [43] CLINICOPATHOLOGICAL DIFFERENCES BETWEEN ANTERIORLY LOCATED AND PERIPHERAL ZONE PROSTATIC LESIONS DETECTED ON PROSTATE MULTIPARAMETRIC MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING
    An, Clemens
    Velmahos, Constantine
    Hunter, Alexandra
    Piroz, Bahar
    Barney, Alfred
    Feng, Aileen
    Dahl, Douglas
    Kim, Michelle
    Wszolek, Matthew
    Salari, Keyan
    Zlatev, Dimitar
    Harisinghani, Mukesh
    Wu, Shulin
    Wu, Chin-Lee
    Feldman, Adam
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2024, 211 (05): : E509 - E509
  • [44] Can Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Be Detected with Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging? A Systematic Review of the Literature
    Futterer, Jurgen J.
    Briganti, Alberto
    De Visschere, Pieter
    Emberton, Mark
    Giannarini, Gianluca
    Kirkham, Alex
    Taneja, Samir S.
    Thoeny, Harriet
    Villeirs, Geert
    Villers, Arnauld
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2015, 68 (06) : 1045 - 1053
  • [45] The Value of Prostate-specific Antigen Density for Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System 3 Lesions on Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Strategy to Avoid Unnecessary Prostate Biopsies
    Goertz, Magdalena
    Radtke, Jan Philipp
    Hatiboglu, Gencay
    Schuetz, Viktoria
    Tosev, Georgi
    Guettlein, Maximilian
    Leichsenring, Jonas
    Stenzinger, Albrecht
    Bonekamp, David
    Schlemmer, Heinz-Peter
    Hohenfellner, Markus
    Nyarangi-Dix, Joanne Nyaboe
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS, 2021, 7 (02): : 325 - 331
  • [46] Correlation of 3T multiparametric prostate MRI using prostate imaging reporting and data system (PIRADS) version 2 with biopsy as reference standard
    Shobhit Mathur
    Martin E. O’Malley
    Sangeet Ghai
    Kartik Jhaveri
    Boraiah Sreeharsha
    Myles Margolis
    Lehang Zhong
    Hassan Maan
    Ants Toi
    Abdominal Radiology, 2019, 44 : 252 - 258
  • [47] Apparent diffusion coefficients in magnetic resonance imaging and prostate imaging reporting and data system score in the canine prostate gland
    Jasinski, T.
    Skierbiszewska, K.
    Domino, M.
    Pawlinski, B.
    Wehrend, A.
    Siewruk, K.
    Ciszkowska, B.
    Gajewska, M.
    Dubiejko, A.
    Gajewski, Z.
    REPRODUCTION IN DOMESTIC ANIMALS, 2018, 53 : 19 - 19
  • [48] Correlation of 3T multiparametric prostate MRI using prostate imaging reporting and data system (PIRADS) version 2 with biopsy as reference standard
    Mathur, Shobhit
    O'Malley, Martin E.
    Ghai, Sangeet
    Jhaveri, Kartik
    Sreeharsha, Boraiah
    Margolis, Myles
    Zhong, Lehang
    Maan, Hassan
    Toi, Ants
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2019, 44 (01) : 252 - 258
  • [49] A Prospective Accuracy Study of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 on Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer With Whole-mount Pathology COMMENT
    Purysko, Andrei S.
    UROLOGY, 2019, 123 : 196 - 197
  • [50] Comparison of quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient parameters with prostate imaging reporting and data system V2 assessment for detection of clinically significant peripheral zone prostate cancer
    Elmira Hassanzadeh
    Francesco Alessandrino
    Olutayo I. Olubiyi
    Daniel I. Glazer
    Robert V. Mulkern
    Andriy Fedorov
    Clare M. Tempany
    Fiona M. Fennessy
    Abdominal Radiology, 2018, 43 : 1237 - 1244