Prevalence of clinically significant prostate carcinoma in Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PIRADS) 3 lesions detected in the peripheral zone on biparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)da local experience

被引:0
|
作者
Khalid, M. J. [1 ]
Parker, P. [1 ]
Smith, S. [1 ]
Byass, O. R. [1 ]
Cast, J. E. I. [1 ]
机构
[1] Hull Univ Teaching Hosp NHS Trust, Dept Radiol, Kingston Upon Hull, England
关键词
CANCER; MRI;
D O I
10.1016/j.crad.2024.07.014
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
AIM: The aim of this study was to determine whether biparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is effective in the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer in prostate peripheral zone Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PIRADS) 3 lesions without the use of dynamic contrast enhancement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who underwent biparametric MRI over a 12-month period from January 2022 to December 2022 and were diagnosed with PIRADS 3 lesion in the peripheral zone were included in the study. No patient received dynamic contrast enhancement. Histological analysis was done after performing local anesthetic transperineal biopsy to determine detection rate of clinically significant prostate cancer. Prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD) and biopsy complication rates were also reviewed. RESULTS: Sixty-one out of 688 MRIs (8.8%) performed over the study period had a PIRADS 3 lesion in the peripheral zone where contrast is supposed to add value. Fifty-eight of the 61 went ahead to biopsy, and csPCa (Gleason score: >= 3 + 4, with a max core length of >= 6 mm and above) was diagnosed in 17%. Among those diagnosed with csPCa, 80% had a PSAD of >= 0.15 ng/ ml/cc. No postbiopsy complications were reported. CONCLUSION: Biparametric MRI without contrast offers a reliable alternative to multi- parametric MRI with minimum or neglible impact on clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) diagnosis in peripheral zone PIRADS 3 lesions, especially when used in conjunction with other factors such as PSAD. There is potential to address health economics and patient burden in prostate cancer investigation. (c) 2024 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.
引用
收藏
页码:773 / 780
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Interpretation of Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging Using Prostate Imaging and Data Reporting System Version 2.1: A Primer
    Spilseth, Benjamin
    Margolis, Daniel J. A.
    Gupta, Rajan T.
    Chang, Silvia D.
    RADIOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2024, 62 (01) : 17 - 36
  • [32] Interpreting Prostate Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Urologists' Guide Including Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System
    Christidis, Daniel
    McGrath, Shannon
    Leaney, Barry
    O'Sullivan, Richard
    Lawrentschuk, Nathan
    UROLOGY, 2018, 111 : 136 - 138
  • [33] Predicting the Need for Biopsy to Detect Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Patients with a Magnetic Resonance Imaging- detected Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System/Likert >3 Lesion: Development and Multinational External Validation of the Imperial Rapid Access to Prostate Imaging and Diagnosis Risk Score
    Peters, Max
    Eldred-Evans, David
    Kurver, Piet
    Falagario, Ugo Giovanni
    Connor, Martin J.
    Shah, Taimur T.
    Verhoeff, Joost J. C.
    Taimen, Pekka
    Aronen, Hannu J.
    Knaapila, Juha
    Perez, Ileana Montoya
    Ettala, Otto
    Stabile, Armando
    Gandaglia, Giorgio
    Fossati, Nicola
    Martini, Alberto
    Cucchiara, Vito
    Briganti, Alberto
    Lantz, Anna
    Picker, Wolfgang
    Haug, Erik Skaaheim
    Nordstrom, Tobias
    Tanaka, Mariana Bertoncelli
    Reddy, Deepika
    Bass, Edward
    van Rossum, Peter S. N.
    Wong, Kathie
    Tam, Henry
    Winkler, Mathias
    Gordon, Stephen
    Qazi, Hasan
    Bostrom, Peter J.
    Jambor, Ivan
    Ahmed, Hashim U.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2022, 82 (05) : 559 - 568
  • [34] Predictors of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Patients with PIRADS Categories 3-5 Undergoing Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy of the Prostate
    Szemplinski, Stanislaw
    Kamecki, Hubert
    Debowska, Malgorzata
    Zagozdzon, Bartlomiej
    Mokrzys, Mateusz
    Zawadzki, Marek
    Sosnowski, Roman
    Tokarczyk, Andrzej
    Poletajew, Slawomir
    Kryst, Piotr
    Nyk, Lukasz
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (01)
  • [35] Comparison of the incidence of clinically significant prostate cancer in patients with isolated peripheral vs. transitional zone PIRADS 3 lesions
    Malshy, K.
    Ochsner, A.
    Ortiz, R.
    Golijanin, B.
    Khaleel, S.
    Eaton, S.
    Golijanin, D.
    Hyams, E.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2024, 85 : S445 - S445
  • [36] Is it worth carrying out ultrasound-magnetic resonance imaging fusion targeted biopsy on Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System score 3 prostate lesions?
    Kim, Kyung Hwan
    Ku, Ja Yoon
    Park, Won Young
    Hong, Seung Baek
    Kim, Suk
    Ha, Hong Koo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 27 (05) : 431 - 438
  • [37] The role of multidisciplinary MRI prostate review meeting in reducing the need for immediate targeted biopsies of prostate imaging reporting and data system (PIRADS) category 3 lesions identified on multiparametric prostate MRI (MP-MRI)
    Choo, Zhen Wei
    Kwok, Jia Lun
    Tan, Teck Wei
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 27 : 29 - 29
  • [38] Negative Predictive Value of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Era: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Sathianathen, Niranjan J.
    Omer, Altan
    Harriss, Eli
    Davies, Lucy
    Kasivisvanathan, Veeru
    Punwani, Shonit
    Moore, Caroline M.
    Kastner, Christof
    Barrett, Tristan
    Van Den Bergh, Roderick C. N.
    Eddy, Ben A.
    Gleeson, Fergus
    Macpherson, Ruth
    Bryant, Richard J.
    Catto, James W. F.
    Murphy, Declan G.
    Hamdy, Freddie C.
    Ahmed, Hashim U.
    Lamb, Alastair D.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2020, 78 (03) : 402 - 414
  • [39] A Prospective Accuracy Study of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 on Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer With Whole-mount Pathology
    Giannarini, Gianluca
    Girometti, Rossano
    Crestani, Alessandro
    Rossanese, Marta
    Calandriello, Mettle
    Cereser, Lorenzo
    Bednarova, Sandra
    Battistella, Claudio
    Sioletic, Stefano
    Zuiani, Chiara
    Valotto, Claudio
    Ficarra, Vincenzo
    UROLOGY, 2019, 123 : 191 - 196
  • [40] Reply to "Standardizing Biparametric MRI to Simplify and Improve Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System, Version 2, in Prostate Cancer Management"
    Rosenkrantz, Andrew B.
    Oto, Aytekin
    Turkbey, Baris
    Westphalen, Antonio C.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2016, 207 (04) : W76 - W76