Ecological and Environmental Risk Warning Framework of Land Use/Cover Change for the Belt and Road Initiative

被引:0
|
作者
He, Yinjie [1 ]
Wu, Dafang [2 ,3 ]
Li, Shuangcheng [3 ]
Zhou, Ping [4 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Shenzhen Res Inst, Shenzhen 518057, Peoples R China
[2] Guangzhou Univ, Sch Geog & Remote Sensing, Guangzhou 510006, Peoples R China
[3] Peking Univ, Lab Earth Surface Proc, Minist Educ, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China
[4] Guangdong Acad Sci, Guangzhou Inst Geog, Guangzhou 510075, Guangdong, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Belt and Road Initiative" (BRI); land use/cover change (LUCC); ecological and environmental risk; bivariate choropleth-multiple-criteria decision analysis (BC-MCDA); geographic information system (GIS); sustainable development goals (SDGs); CHINA BELT; ENERGY;
D O I
10.3390/land13081281
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Land use/cover change(LUCC) has a significant impact on the ecological environment. Within the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), as the largest cross-spatial cooperation initiative in human history, one of the core issues is how to scientifically and effectively use and manage the land in the region to prevent the destruction of important ecological and environmental resources. In order to reduce impact on the latter, in this study, we used the bivariate choropleth-multiple-criteria decision analysis (BC-MCDA) method based on the connotation of the sustainable development goals to construct an ecological and environmental risk warning framework. We found that in the study area, 10.51% of the land has high ecological and environmental risk and importance, corresponding to conflict zones, which require special attention. Conflict areas are mainly distributed in the Gangetic Plain in India, the plains in central and southern Cambodia, the Indonesian archipelago, and the southern coastal areas of China. Due to the uneven spatial distributions of population and important ecological and environmental resources, the pressure on this type of land use is very high. A share of 8.06% of the land has high risk-low importance, corresponding to economic development zones. Following years of human development, the ecological and environmental value of this type of land is low. A share of 58.75% of the land has low risk and importance, corresponding to wilderness areas. The natural climatic conditions of this type of land are relatively poor, often characterized by a cold climate or water scarcity, and the human interference index is low. A share of 22.68% of the land has low risk-high importance, corresponding to ecological conservation areas, which are the most important areas for ecological function services for humans at present. Finally, we proposed development suggestions for each type of land.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Parametric land cover and land-use classifications as tools for environmental change detection
    Jansen, LJM
    Di Gregorio, A
    AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2002, 91 (1-3) : 89 - 100
  • [32] Land use and land cover change in Arctic Russia: Ecological and social implications of industrial development
    Kumpula, Timo
    Pajunen, Anu
    Kaarlejarvi, Elina
    Forbes, Bruce C.
    Stammler, Florian
    GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2011, 21 (02): : 550 - 562
  • [33] Environmental context of land use and land cover change processes in Calimaya, Mexican Altiplano
    Loureiro, Guilherme Amorim Homem de Abreu
    Valdez, Rodrigo Antonio Escalona
    Rodriguez, Luis Miguel Espinosa
    Perez, Jose Isabel Juan
    Plata, Miguel Angel Balderas
    REVISTA GEOGRAFICA DE AMERICA CENTRAL, 2023, (70): : 221 - 241
  • [34] LAND-USE AND LAND COVER IN GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL-CHANGE - CONSIDERATIONS FOR STUDY
    TURNER, BL
    MEYER, WB
    INTERNATIONAL SOCIAL SCIENCE JOURNAL, 1991, 43 (04) : 669 - 679
  • [35] A Framework to Assess Debt Sustainability under the Belt and Road Initiative
    Bandiera, Luca
    Tsiropoulos, Vasileios
    JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2020, 146
  • [36] Currency risk analysis of belt and road initiative countries
    Li, Mengyang
    Liu, Wencui
    Wang, Lei
    PLOS ONE, 2024, 19 (07):
  • [37] Environmental Impacts of Infrastructure Development under the Belt and Road Initiative
    Teo, Hoong Chen
    Lechner, Alex Mark
    Walton, Grant W.
    Chan, Faith Ka Shun
    Cheshmehzangi, Ali
    Tan-Mullins, May
    Chan, Hing Kai
    Sternberg, Troy
    Campos-Arceiz, Ahimsa
    ENVIRONMENTS, 2019, 6 (06)
  • [38] LAND-USE AND LAND COVER CHANGE
    不详
    AMBIO, 1992, 21 (01) : 122 - 123
  • [39] Mapping the environmental footprints of nations partnering the Belt and Road Initiative
    Fang, Kai
    Wang, Siqi
    He, Jianjian
    Song, Junnian
    Fang, Chuanglin
    Jia, Xiaoping
    RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2021, 164
  • [40] LAND USE AND LAND COVER CHANGE IN CHINA
    Li ffenll
    ia(Commission for Integrated Survey of Natural Resources
    The Journal of Chinese Geography, 1994, (Z2) : 25 - 40