Ecological and Environmental Risk Warning Framework of Land Use/Cover Change for the Belt and Road Initiative

被引:0
|
作者
He, Yinjie [1 ]
Wu, Dafang [2 ,3 ]
Li, Shuangcheng [3 ]
Zhou, Ping [4 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Shenzhen Res Inst, Shenzhen 518057, Peoples R China
[2] Guangzhou Univ, Sch Geog & Remote Sensing, Guangzhou 510006, Peoples R China
[3] Peking Univ, Lab Earth Surface Proc, Minist Educ, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China
[4] Guangdong Acad Sci, Guangzhou Inst Geog, Guangzhou 510075, Guangdong, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Belt and Road Initiative" (BRI); land use/cover change (LUCC); ecological and environmental risk; bivariate choropleth-multiple-criteria decision analysis (BC-MCDA); geographic information system (GIS); sustainable development goals (SDGs); CHINA BELT; ENERGY;
D O I
10.3390/land13081281
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Land use/cover change(LUCC) has a significant impact on the ecological environment. Within the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), as the largest cross-spatial cooperation initiative in human history, one of the core issues is how to scientifically and effectively use and manage the land in the region to prevent the destruction of important ecological and environmental resources. In order to reduce impact on the latter, in this study, we used the bivariate choropleth-multiple-criteria decision analysis (BC-MCDA) method based on the connotation of the sustainable development goals to construct an ecological and environmental risk warning framework. We found that in the study area, 10.51% of the land has high ecological and environmental risk and importance, corresponding to conflict zones, which require special attention. Conflict areas are mainly distributed in the Gangetic Plain in India, the plains in central and southern Cambodia, the Indonesian archipelago, and the southern coastal areas of China. Due to the uneven spatial distributions of population and important ecological and environmental resources, the pressure on this type of land use is very high. A share of 8.06% of the land has high risk-low importance, corresponding to economic development zones. Following years of human development, the ecological and environmental value of this type of land is low. A share of 58.75% of the land has low risk and importance, corresponding to wilderness areas. The natural climatic conditions of this type of land are relatively poor, often characterized by a cold climate or water scarcity, and the human interference index is low. A share of 22.68% of the land has low risk-high importance, corresponding to ecological conservation areas, which are the most important areas for ecological function services for humans at present. Finally, we proposed development suggestions for each type of land.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Environmental governance of China's Belt and Road Initiative
    Sun, Yixian
    Lewis, Joanna I.
    Urpelainen, Johannes
    ENVIRONMENTAL POLITICS, 2023, 32 (07) : 1109 - 1116
  • [22] Status and Prospect of Ecological Environment in the Belt and Road Initiative Regions
    Du, Xixi
    Qin, Yi
    Huang, Chunbo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (24)
  • [23] Effects of land use/cover change on heavy metal distribution of soils in wetlands and ecological risk assessment
    Korkanc, Selma Yasar
    Korkanc, Mustafa
    Amiri, Ahmad Farid
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 923
  • [24] Assessment of Land Cover Status and Change in the World and "the Belt and Road" Region from 2016 to 2020
    Yang, Aixia
    Zhong, Bo
    Hu, Longfei
    Kai, Ao
    Li, Li
    Zhao, Fei
    Wu, Junjun
    SENSORS, 2023, 23 (16)
  • [25] A conceptual framework for assessing social and environmental impacts of belt and road initiative and just energy transition
    Ge, Taoan
    FRONTIERS IN SUSTAINABLE FOOD SYSTEMS, 2022, 6
  • [26] Ecological Environmental Effects and Their Driving Factors of Land Use/Cover Change: The Case Study of Baiyangdian Basin, China
    Xia, Boyu
    Zheng, Linchang
    PROCESSES, 2022, 10 (12)
  • [27] Land use and cover in ecological economics
    Darwin, R
    Tsigas, M
    Lewandrowski, J
    Raneses, A
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 1996, 17 (03) : 157 - 181
  • [28] Land use and cover change
    Mather, AS
    LAND USE POLICY, 1999, 16 (03) : 143 - 143
  • [29] Land use and cover change
    Brazel, AJ
    LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2002, 58 (01) : 71 - 71
  • [30] EXPLORING LINKAGES AMONG LAND USE/LAND COVER CHANGE, ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT
    Tsiaras, S.
    Samara, T.
    Spanos, I.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND ECOLOGY, 2017, 18 (03): : 879 - 888