Ecological and Environmental Risk Warning Framework of Land Use/Cover Change for the Belt and Road Initiative

被引:0
|
作者
He, Yinjie [1 ]
Wu, Dafang [2 ,3 ]
Li, Shuangcheng [3 ]
Zhou, Ping [4 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Shenzhen Res Inst, Shenzhen 518057, Peoples R China
[2] Guangzhou Univ, Sch Geog & Remote Sensing, Guangzhou 510006, Peoples R China
[3] Peking Univ, Lab Earth Surface Proc, Minist Educ, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China
[4] Guangdong Acad Sci, Guangzhou Inst Geog, Guangzhou 510075, Guangdong, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Belt and Road Initiative" (BRI); land use/cover change (LUCC); ecological and environmental risk; bivariate choropleth-multiple-criteria decision analysis (BC-MCDA); geographic information system (GIS); sustainable development goals (SDGs); CHINA BELT; ENERGY;
D O I
10.3390/land13081281
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Land use/cover change(LUCC) has a significant impact on the ecological environment. Within the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), as the largest cross-spatial cooperation initiative in human history, one of the core issues is how to scientifically and effectively use and manage the land in the region to prevent the destruction of important ecological and environmental resources. In order to reduce impact on the latter, in this study, we used the bivariate choropleth-multiple-criteria decision analysis (BC-MCDA) method based on the connotation of the sustainable development goals to construct an ecological and environmental risk warning framework. We found that in the study area, 10.51% of the land has high ecological and environmental risk and importance, corresponding to conflict zones, which require special attention. Conflict areas are mainly distributed in the Gangetic Plain in India, the plains in central and southern Cambodia, the Indonesian archipelago, and the southern coastal areas of China. Due to the uneven spatial distributions of population and important ecological and environmental resources, the pressure on this type of land use is very high. A share of 8.06% of the land has high risk-low importance, corresponding to economic development zones. Following years of human development, the ecological and environmental value of this type of land is low. A share of 58.75% of the land has low risk and importance, corresponding to wilderness areas. The natural climatic conditions of this type of land are relatively poor, often characterized by a cold climate or water scarcity, and the human interference index is low. A share of 22.68% of the land has low risk-high importance, corresponding to ecological conservation areas, which are the most important areas for ecological function services for humans at present. Finally, we proposed development suggestions for each type of land.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Ecological Risks and Patterns Associated With Land Use/Cover Changes Along the Belt and Road Initiative Routes
    He, Yinjie
    Liu, Xinran
    Wu, Dafang
    Li, Shuangcheng
    Zhou, Ping
    LAND DEGRADATION & DEVELOPMENT, 2025,
  • [2] Exploring Changes in Land Use and Landscape Ecological Risk in Key Regions of the Belt and Road Initiative Countries
    Zhang, Xuebin
    Yao, Litang
    Luo, Jun
    Liang, Wenjuan
    LAND, 2022, 11 (06)
  • [3] Cultivated land change in the Belt and Road Initiative region
    Chen Di
    Yu Qiangyi
    Hu Qiong
    Xiang Mingtao
    Zhou Qingbo
    Wu Wenbin
    JOURNAL OF GEOGRAPHICAL SCIENCES, 2018, 28 (11) : 1580 - 1594
  • [4] Cultivated land change in the Belt and Road Initiative region
    Di Chen
    Qiangyi Yu
    Qiong Hu
    Mingtao Xiang
    Qingbo Zhou
    Wenbin Wu
    Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2018, 28 : 1580 - 1594
  • [5] Projecting the response of ecological risk to land use/land cover change in ecologically fragile regions
    Deng, Guangyi
    Jiang, Haibo
    Zhu, Shiying
    Wen, Yang
    He, Chunguang
    Wang, Xue
    Sheng, Lianxi
    Guo, Yue
    Cao, Yingyue
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 914
  • [6] Environmental challenges for the Belt and Road Initiative
    Fernando Ascensão
    Lenore Fahrig
    Anthony P. Clevenger
    Richard T. Corlett
    Jochen A. G. Jaeger
    William F. Laurance
    Henrique M. Pereira
    Nature Sustainability, 2018, 1 : 206 - 209
  • [7] Environmental challenges for the Belt and Road Initiative
    Ascensao, Fernando
    Fahrig, Lenore
    Clevenger, Anthony P.
    Corlett, Richard T.
    Jaeger, Jochen A. G.
    Laurance, William F.
    Pereira, Henrique M.
    NATURE SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 1 (05): : 206 - 209
  • [8] A decade of ecological and environmental research on the belt and road initiative: Evolution and future directions
    Gong, Yongyue
    Wang, Heming
    Tzachor, Asaf
    Fishman, Tomer
    Ma, Fengmei
    Hou, Lingli
    Wang, Yao
    Sun, Wenju
    Song, Yihan
    Fang, Kai
    Chen, Wei-Qiang
    Mazei, Yuri
    Tiunov, Alexei
    RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2025, 217
  • [9] Environmental governance of transportation infrastructure under Belt and Road Initiative: A unified framework
    Wang, Xueqin
    Wong, Yiik Diew
    Yuen, Kum Fai
    Li, Kevin X.
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2020, 139 : 189 - 199
  • [10] Ecological effects of land use and land cover change in the typical ecological functional zones of Egypt
    Liu, Yuanyuan
    Ma, Caihong
    Ma, Liya
    Li, Na
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2024, 168