Longitudinal Prediction of Psychosocial Functioning Outcomes: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, Section-II Personality Disorders Versus Alternative Model Personality Dysfunction and Traits

被引:1
|
作者
Clark, Lee Anna [1 ]
Ro, Eunyoe [2 ]
Vittengl, Jeffrey R. [3 ]
Jarrett, Robin B. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Notre Dame, Dept Psychol, 390 Corbett Hall, Notre Dame, IN 46556 USA
[2] Southern Illinois Univ Edwardsville, Dept Psychol, Edwardsville, IL USA
[3] Truman State Univ, Dept Psychol, Kirksville, MO USA
[4] Univ Texas Southwestern Med Ctr, Dept Psychiat, Dallas, TX USA
关键词
DSM-5 personality disorders; alternative model of personality disorders; psychosocial functioning outcomes; personality dysfunction; maladaptive-range traits; DSM-5; LEVEL; CLASSIFICATION; VALIDATION; COMORBIDITY; INVENTORY; CRITERION; INTERVIEW; VALIDITY; IV;
D O I
10.1037/per0000673
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
We aimed to determine and compare the longitudinal predictive power of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fifth edition's (DSM-5) two models of personality disorder (PD) for multiple clinically relevant outcomes. A sample of 600 community-dwelling adults-half recruited by calling randomly selected phone numbers and screening-in for high-risk for personality pathology and half in treatment for mental health problems-completed an extensive battery of self-report and interview measures of personality pathology, clinical symptoms, and psychosocial functioning. Of these, 503 returned for retesting on the same measures an average of 8 months later. We used Time 1 interview data to assess DSM-5 personality pathology, both the Section-II PDs and the alternative (DSM-5) model of personality disorder's (AMPD) Criterion A (impairment) and Criterion B (adaptive-to-maladaptive-range trait domains and facets). We used these measures to predict 20 Time 2 functioning outcomes. Both PD models significantly predicted functioning-outcome variance, albeit modestly-averaging 12.6% and 17.9% (Section-II diagnoses and criterion counts, respectively) and 15.2% and 23.2% (AMPD domains and facets, respectively). Each model significantly augmented the other in hierarchical regressions, but the AMPD domains (6.30%) and facets (8.62%) predicted more incremental variance than the Section-II diagnoses (3.74%) and criterion counts (3.31%), respectively. Borderline PD accounted for just over half of Section II's predictive power, whereas the AMPD's predictive power was more evenly distributed across components. We note the predictive advantages of dimensional models and articulate the theoretical and clinical advantages of the AMPD's separation of personality functioning impairment from how this is manifested in personality traits.
引用
收藏
页码:341 / 351
页数:11
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [41] Structure of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition Criteria for Obsessive-Compulsive Personality Disorder in Patients With Binge Eating Disorder
    Ansell, Emily B.
    Pinto, Anthony
    Edelen, Maria Orlando
    Grilo, Carlos M.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHIATRIE, 2008, 53 (12): : 863 - 867
  • [42] The Structure of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th Edition, Text Revision) Personality Disorder Symptoms in a Large National Sample
    Trull, Timothy J.
    Verges, Alvaro
    Wood, Phillip K.
    Jahng, Seungmin
    Sher, Kenneth J.
    PERSONALITY DISORDERS-THEORY RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2012, 3 (04) : 355 - 369
  • [43] Head-to-Head Comparison of the Alternative Model for Personality Disorders and Section II Personality Disorder Model in Terms of Predicting Patient Outcomes 1 Year Later
    Weekers, Laura C. C.
    Hutsebaut, Joost
    Rovers, Jenneke M. C.
    Kamphuis, Jan H. H.
    PERSONALITY DISORDERS-THEORY RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2024, 15 (02) : 101 - 109
  • [44] Characteristics of nosologically informative data sets that address key diagnostic issues facing the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fifth edition (DSM-V) and International Classification of Diseases, eleventh edition (ICD-II) substance use disorders workgroups
    Cottler, Linda B.
    Grant, Bridget F.
    ADDICTION, 2006, 101 : 161 - 169