Longitudinal Prediction of Psychosocial Functioning Outcomes: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, Section-II Personality Disorders Versus Alternative Model Personality Dysfunction and Traits

被引:1
|
作者
Clark, Lee Anna [1 ]
Ro, Eunyoe [2 ]
Vittengl, Jeffrey R. [3 ]
Jarrett, Robin B. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Notre Dame, Dept Psychol, 390 Corbett Hall, Notre Dame, IN 46556 USA
[2] Southern Illinois Univ Edwardsville, Dept Psychol, Edwardsville, IL USA
[3] Truman State Univ, Dept Psychol, Kirksville, MO USA
[4] Univ Texas Southwestern Med Ctr, Dept Psychiat, Dallas, TX USA
关键词
DSM-5 personality disorders; alternative model of personality disorders; psychosocial functioning outcomes; personality dysfunction; maladaptive-range traits; DSM-5; LEVEL; CLASSIFICATION; VALIDATION; COMORBIDITY; INVENTORY; CRITERION; INTERVIEW; VALIDITY; IV;
D O I
10.1037/per0000673
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
We aimed to determine and compare the longitudinal predictive power of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fifth edition's (DSM-5) two models of personality disorder (PD) for multiple clinically relevant outcomes. A sample of 600 community-dwelling adults-half recruited by calling randomly selected phone numbers and screening-in for high-risk for personality pathology and half in treatment for mental health problems-completed an extensive battery of self-report and interview measures of personality pathology, clinical symptoms, and psychosocial functioning. Of these, 503 returned for retesting on the same measures an average of 8 months later. We used Time 1 interview data to assess DSM-5 personality pathology, both the Section-II PDs and the alternative (DSM-5) model of personality disorder's (AMPD) Criterion A (impairment) and Criterion B (adaptive-to-maladaptive-range trait domains and facets). We used these measures to predict 20 Time 2 functioning outcomes. Both PD models significantly predicted functioning-outcome variance, albeit modestly-averaging 12.6% and 17.9% (Section-II diagnoses and criterion counts, respectively) and 15.2% and 23.2% (AMPD domains and facets, respectively). Each model significantly augmented the other in hierarchical regressions, but the AMPD domains (6.30%) and facets (8.62%) predicted more incremental variance than the Section-II diagnoses (3.74%) and criterion counts (3.31%), respectively. Borderline PD accounted for just over half of Section II's predictive power, whereas the AMPD's predictive power was more evenly distributed across components. We note the predictive advantages of dimensional models and articulate the theoretical and clinical advantages of the AMPD's separation of personality functioning impairment from how this is manifested in personality traits.
引用
收藏
页码:341 / 351
页数:11
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [21] A Personality Trait Model for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM): The Challenges Ahead
    Krueger, Robert F.
    Eaton, Nicholas R.
    PERSONALITY DISORDERS-THEORY RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2010, 1 (02) : 135 - 137
  • [22] The relationship between five-factor model and diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorder-fifth edition personality traits on patients with antisocial personality disorder
    Amini, Mahdi
    Pourshahbaz, Abbas
    Mohammadkhani, Parvaneh
    Ardakani, Mohammad-Reza Khodaie
    Lotfi, Mozhgan
    Ramezani, Mohammad Arash
    JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2015, 20 (05): : 470 - 476
  • [23] Is the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, histrionic personality disorder category a valid construct?
    Bakkevig, Jonas F.
    Karterud, Sigmund
    COMPREHENSIVE PSYCHIATRY, 2010, 51 (05) : 462 - 470
  • [24] Validity aspects of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, narcissistic personality disorder construct
    Karterud, Sigmund
    Oien, Maria
    Pedersen, Geir
    COMPREHENSIVE PSYCHIATRY, 2011, 52 (05) : 517 - 526
  • [25] A latent structure analysis of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, narcissistic personality disorder criteria
    Fossati, A
    Beauchaine, TP
    Grazioli, F
    Carretta, I
    Cortinovis, F
    Maffei, C
    COMPREHENSIVE PSYCHIATRY, 2005, 46 (05) : 361 - 367
  • [26] Revising the Personality Disorder Diagnostic Criteria for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-Fifth Edition (DSM-V): Consider the Later Life Context
    Balsis, Steve
    Segal, Daniel L.
    Donahue, Cailin
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPSYCHIATRY, 2009, 79 (04) : 452 - 460
  • [27] Associations Between the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, Alternative Model of Antisocial Personality Disorder, Psychopathic Specifier, and Psychopathy-Related Facets With Aggression in a Sample of Incarcerated Males
    Dunne, Ashley L.
    Lloyd, Caleb
    Lee, Stuart
    Daffern, Michael
    PERSONALITY DISORDERS-THEORY RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2020, 11 (02) : 108 - 118
  • [28] The Investigation of Construct Validity of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorder-5 Personality Traits on Iranian sample with Antisocial and Borderline Personality Disorders
    Amini, Mehdi
    Pourshahbaz, Abbas
    Mohammadkhani, Parvaneh
    Ardakani, Mohammad-Reza Khodaie
    Lotfi, Mozhgan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2014, 5 (12) : 1601 - 1607
  • [29] The relationship between the five-factor model and latent Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition personality disorder dimensions
    Nestadt, Gerald
    Costa, Paul T., Jr.
    Hsu, Fang-Chi
    Samuels, Jack
    Bienvenu, O. Joseph
    Eaton, William W.
    COMPREHENSIVE PSYCHIATRY, 2008, 49 (01) : 98 - 105
  • [30] Validating the Proposed Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition, Severity Indicator for Personality Disorder
    Morey, Leslie C.
    Bender, Donna S.
    Skodol, Andrew E.
    JOURNAL OF NERVOUS AND MENTAL DISEASE, 2013, 201 (09) : 729 - 735