Impacts of Clinical Decision Support Systems on the Relationship,Communication, and Shared Decision-Making Between HealthCare Professionals and Patients: Multistakeholder Interview Study

被引:1
|
作者
Funer, Florian [1 ,2 ]
Schneider, Diana [3 ]
Heyen, Nils B. [3 ]
Aichinger, Heike [3 ]
Klausen, Andrea Diana [4 ]
Tinnemeyer, Sara [2 ]
Liedtke, Wenke [5 ,6 ]
Salloch, Sabine [2 ]
Bratan, Tanja [3 ]
机构
[1] Eberhard Karls Univ Tuebingen, Inst Eth & Hist Med, Tubingen, Germany
[2] Hannover Med Sch, Inst Eth Hist & Philosophy Med, Hannover, Germany
[3] Fraunhofer Inst Syst & Innovat Res ISI, Competence Ctr Emerging Technol, Breslauer Str 48, D-76139 Karlsruhe, Germany
[4] Univ Med Ctr RWTH Aachen, Inst Med Informat, Aachen, Germany
[5] Protestant Univ Appl Sci Rhineland Westphalia Lipp, Dept Social Work, Bochum, Germany
[6] Univ Greifswald, Fac Theol, Eth & Its Didact, Greifswald, Germany
关键词
clinical decision support system; CDSS; health care professionals; patients; relationships; communication; shared decision-making; Germany;
D O I
10.2196/55717
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) are increasingly being introduced into various domains of health care. Little is known so far about the impact of such systems on the health care professional-patient relationship, and there is a lack of agreement about whether and how patients should be informed about the use of CDSSs. Objective: This study aims to explore, in an empirically informed manner, the potential implications for the health care professional-patient relationship and to underline the importance of this relationship when using CDSSs for both patients and future professionals. Methods: Using a methodological triangulation, 15 medical students and 12 trainee nurses were interviewed in semistructured interviews and 18 patients were involved in focus groups between April 2021 and April 2022. All participants came from Germany. Three examples of CDSSs covering different areas of health care (ie, surgery, nephrology, and intensive home care) were used as stimuli in the study to identify similarities and differences regarding the use of CDSSs in different fields of application. The interview and focus group transcripts were analyzed using a structured qualitative content analysis. Results:From the interviews and focus groups analyzed, three topics were identified that interdependently address the interactions between patients and health care professionals: (1) CDSSs and their impact on the roles of and requirements for health care professionals, (2) CDSSs and their impact on the relationship between health care professionals and patients (including communication requirements for shared decision-making), and (3) stakeholders' expectations for patient education and information about CDSSs and their use. Conclusions: The results indicate that using CDSSs could restructure established power and decision-making relationships between (future) health care professionals and patients. In addition, respondents expected that the use of CDSSs would involve more communication, so they anticipated an increased time commitment. The results shed new light on the existing discourse by demonstrating that the anticipated impact of CDSSs on the health care professional-patient relationship appears to stem less from the function of a CDSS and more from its integration in the relationship. Therefore, the anticipated effects on the relationship between health care professionals and patients could be specifically addressed in patient information about the use of CDSSs.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Healthcare professionals' behaviour regarding the implementation of shared decision-making in screening programmes: A systematic review
    Hernandez-Leal, Maria Jose
    Perez-Lacasta, Maria Jose
    Feijoo-Cid, Maria
    Ramos-Garcia, Vanesa
    Carles-Lavila, Misericordia
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2021, 104 (08) : 1933 - 1944
  • [42] How to support parents and healthcare professionals in the decision-making process of tube feeding in children?
    Remijn, Lianne
    Kalsbeek, Cecilia J. C.
    Platteel, Vanesse
    Kindermann, Angelika
    DISABILITY AND HEALTH JOURNAL, 2022, 15 (02)
  • [43] Shared decision-making in psoriasis treatment: a qualitative interview study on the prescription of apremilast
    Hewitt, R.
    Bundy, C.
    Newi, A. -L.
    Chachos, E.
    Sommer, R.
    Kleyn, C. E.
    Augustin, M.
    Griffiths, C. E. M.
    Blome, C.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2022, 186 (01) : E55 - E56
  • [44] NEEDS AND EXPERIENCES OF PATIENTS AND HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONALS TOWARDS SHARED DECISION MAKING IN MULTIPLE MYELOMA CLINICAL PRACTICE: A QUALITATIVE STUDY IN EUROPE
    Schoefs, E.
    Verbeke, C.
    Broekmans, J.
    ten Seldam, S.
    Morgan, K.
    Joyner, K.
    Aviv, A.
    Shoham, V
    Vanhellemont, A.
    Delforge, M.
    Huys, I
    Janssens, R.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2023, 26 (12) : S473 - S473
  • [45] Racism in healthcare: Its relationship to shared decision-making and health disparities: A response to Bradby
    Peek, Monica E.
    Odoms-Young, Angela
    Quinn, Michael T.
    Gorawara-Bhat, Rita
    Wilson, Shannon C.
    Chin, Marshall H.
    SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2010, 71 (01) : 13 - 17
  • [46] How do older patients and their GPs evaluate shared decision-making in healthcare?
    Rotar-Pavlič D.
    Švab I.
    Wetzels R.
    BMC Geriatrics, 8 (1)
  • [47] Information and communication priorities of patients and healthcare professionals in shared decision making regarding adjuvant systemic breast cancer treatment: A survey study
    Damman, Olga C.
    Strien-Knippenberg, Inge S. van
    Engelhardt, Ellen G.
    Determann, D. Domino
    Bruijne, Martine C. de
    Siesling, Sabine
    Konings, Inge R.
    Timmermans, Danielle R.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY NURSING, 2024, 70
  • [48] Assessing the communication gap between AI models and healthcare professionals: Explainability, utility and trust in AI-driven clinical decision-making
    Wysocki, Oskar
    Davies, Jessica Katharine
    Vigo, Markel
    Armstrong, Anne Caroline
    Landers, Donal
    Lee, Rebecca
    Freitas, Andre
    ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2023, 316
  • [49] Shared decision-making between patients and healthcare providers at rural health facilities in Eastern Uganda: an exploratory qualitative study
    Owino, Ranga Solomon
    Kituuka, Olivia
    Kutyabami, Paul
    Sewankambo, Nelson K.
    BMC MEDICAL ETHICS, 2025, 26 (01):
  • [50] Tailored talks, a digital communication platform to support shared decision-making in severe stroke
    Visvanathan, A.
    MacRaild, A.
    Morton, S.
    Mead, G.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STROKE, 2023, 18 (01) : 104 - 105