Impacts of Clinical Decision Support Systems on the Relationship,Communication, and Shared Decision-Making Between HealthCare Professionals and Patients: Multistakeholder Interview Study

被引:1
|
作者
Funer, Florian [1 ,2 ]
Schneider, Diana [3 ]
Heyen, Nils B. [3 ]
Aichinger, Heike [3 ]
Klausen, Andrea Diana [4 ]
Tinnemeyer, Sara [2 ]
Liedtke, Wenke [5 ,6 ]
Salloch, Sabine [2 ]
Bratan, Tanja [3 ]
机构
[1] Eberhard Karls Univ Tuebingen, Inst Eth & Hist Med, Tubingen, Germany
[2] Hannover Med Sch, Inst Eth Hist & Philosophy Med, Hannover, Germany
[3] Fraunhofer Inst Syst & Innovat Res ISI, Competence Ctr Emerging Technol, Breslauer Str 48, D-76139 Karlsruhe, Germany
[4] Univ Med Ctr RWTH Aachen, Inst Med Informat, Aachen, Germany
[5] Protestant Univ Appl Sci Rhineland Westphalia Lipp, Dept Social Work, Bochum, Germany
[6] Univ Greifswald, Fac Theol, Eth & Its Didact, Greifswald, Germany
关键词
clinical decision support system; CDSS; health care professionals; patients; relationships; communication; shared decision-making; Germany;
D O I
10.2196/55717
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) are increasingly being introduced into various domains of health care. Little is known so far about the impact of such systems on the health care professional-patient relationship, and there is a lack of agreement about whether and how patients should be informed about the use of CDSSs. Objective: This study aims to explore, in an empirically informed manner, the potential implications for the health care professional-patient relationship and to underline the importance of this relationship when using CDSSs for both patients and future professionals. Methods: Using a methodological triangulation, 15 medical students and 12 trainee nurses were interviewed in semistructured interviews and 18 patients were involved in focus groups between April 2021 and April 2022. All participants came from Germany. Three examples of CDSSs covering different areas of health care (ie, surgery, nephrology, and intensive home care) were used as stimuli in the study to identify similarities and differences regarding the use of CDSSs in different fields of application. The interview and focus group transcripts were analyzed using a structured qualitative content analysis. Results:From the interviews and focus groups analyzed, three topics were identified that interdependently address the interactions between patients and health care professionals: (1) CDSSs and their impact on the roles of and requirements for health care professionals, (2) CDSSs and their impact on the relationship between health care professionals and patients (including communication requirements for shared decision-making), and (3) stakeholders' expectations for patient education and information about CDSSs and their use. Conclusions: The results indicate that using CDSSs could restructure established power and decision-making relationships between (future) health care professionals and patients. In addition, respondents expected that the use of CDSSs would involve more communication, so they anticipated an increased time commitment. The results shed new light on the existing discourse by demonstrating that the anticipated impact of CDSSs on the health care professional-patient relationship appears to stem less from the function of a CDSS and more from its integration in the relationship. Therefore, the anticipated effects on the relationship between health care professionals and patients could be specifically addressed in patient information about the use of CDSSs.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Health literacy and shared decision-making in predictive medicine - professionals' perceptions and communication strategies
    Harzheim, Laura
    Lorke, Mariya
    Schulz, Sabine
    Juenger, Saskia
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH-HEIDELBERG, 2023,
  • [32] THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN MANAGERIAL AND CLINICAL DECISION-MAKING IN THE HOSPITAL
    GRINER, PF
    MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 1988, 8 (03) : 151 - 154
  • [33] Mental health professionals' experiences with shared decision-making for patients with psychotic disorders: a qualitative study
    Haugom, Espen W.
    Stensrud, Bjorn
    Beston, Gro
    Ruud, Torleif
    Landheim, Anne S.
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [34] Mental health professionals’ experiences with shared decision-making for patients with psychotic disorders: a qualitative study
    Espen W. Haugom
    Bjørn Stensrud
    Gro Beston
    Torleif Ruud
    Anne S. Landheim
    BMC Health Services Research, 20
  • [35] Shared clinical decision-making experiences in nursing: a qualitative study
    Fen-Fang Chung
    Pao-Yu Wang
    Shu-Chuan Lin
    Yu-Hsia Lee
    Hon-Yen Wu
    Mei-Hsiang Lin
    BMC Nursing, 20
  • [36] Shared clinical decision-making experiences in nursing: a qualitative study
    Chung, Fen-Fang
    Wang, Pao-Yu
    Lin, Shu-Chuan
    Lee, Yu-Hsia
    Wu, Hon-Yen
    Lin, Mei-Hsiang
    BMC NURSING, 2021, 20 (01)
  • [37] Development of a shared decision-making tool to support patients and their healthcare provider in choosing the best inhaler device
    Metting, Esther I.
    Van Dijk, Lise
    El Messlaki, Halima
    Luers, Jos
    Kock, Janwillem
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2018, 52
  • [38] Value-based Healthcare: Integrating Shared Decision-making into Clinical Practice
    Chen, Michelle
    Sepucha, Karen
    Bozic, Kevin J.
    Jayakumar, Prakash
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2023, 481 (03) : 448 - 450
  • [39] Shared decision-making in the ICU from the perspective of physicians, nurses and patients: a qualitative interview study
    Wubben, Nina
    van den Boogaard, Mark
    van der Hoeven, J. G.
    Zegers, Marieke
    BMJ OPEN, 2021, 11 (08):
  • [40] Communication and shared decision-making after stillbirth: Results of the ShaDeS study
    Ravaldi, Claudia
    Mercuro, Chiara
    Mosconi, Laura
    Roper, Francesca
    Lotto, Lorella
    Vannacci, Alfredo
    Gavaruzzi, Teresa
    WOMEN AND BIRTH, 2023, 36 (05) : E518 - E526