Deceased-Donor Kidney Transplant Outcome Prediction Using Artificial Intelligence to Aid Decision-Making in Kidney Allocation

被引:0
|
作者
Ali, Hatem [1 ]
Mohamed, Mahmoud [2 ]
Molnar, Miklos Z. [3 ]
Fueloep, Tibor [4 ,5 ]
Burke, Bernard [6 ]
Shroff, Arun [7 ]
Shroff, Sunil [7 ]
Briggs, David [8 ,9 ]
Krishnan, Nithya [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Coventry & Warwickshire, Coventry, England
[2] Univ Hosp Mississippi, Jackson, MS USA
[3] Univ Utah, Spencer Fox Eccles Sch Med, Dept Internal Med, Div Nephrol & Hypertens, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[4] Med Univ South Carolina, Div Nephrol, Dept Med, Charleston, SC USA
[5] Ralph H Johnson VA Med Ctr, Med Serv, Charleston, SC USA
[6] Coventry Univ, Res Ctr Hlth & Life Sci, Coventry, England
[7] MOHAN Fdn, Xtend AI, Medindia net, Gurugram, India
[8] NHS Blood & Transplant, Histocompatibil & Immunogenet, Birmingham, England
[9] Univ Birmingham, Inst Immunol & Immunotherapy, Birmingham, England
关键词
kidney allocation schemes; artificial intelligence; SURVIVAL; DISPARITIES; IMPACT; COST;
D O I
10.1097/MAT.0000000000002190
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
In kidney transplantation, pairing recipients with the highest longevity with low-risk allografts to optimize graft-donor survival is a complex challenge. Current risk prediction models exhibit limited discriminative and calibration capabilities and have not been compared to modern decision-assisting tools. We aimed to develop a highly accurate risk-stratification index using artificial intelligence (AI) techniques. Using data from the UNOS database (156,749 deceased kidney transplants, 2007-2021), we randomly divided transplants into training (80%) and validation (20%) sets. The primary measure was death-censored graft survival. Four machine learning models were assessed for calibration (integrated Brier score [IBS]) and discrimination (time-dependent concordance [CTD] index), compared with existing models. We conducted decision curve analysis and external validation using UK Transplant data. The Deep Cox mixture model showed the best discriminative performance (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.66, 0.67, and 0.68 at 6, 9, and 12 years post-transplant), with CTD at 0.66. Calibration was adequate (IBS = 0.12), while the kidney donor profile index (KDPI) model had lower CTD (0.59) and AUC (0.60). AI-based D-TOP outperformed the KDPI in evaluating transplant pairs based on graft survival, potentially enhancing deceased donor selection. Advanced computing is poised to influence kidney allocation schemes.
引用
收藏
页码:808 / 818
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] PATIENT PERSPECTIVES ON DECISION MAKING IN DECEASED DONOR KIDNEY TRANSPLANT OFFERS: A QUALITATIVE STUDY
    Weightman, Alison
    Duncanson, Emily
    Coghlan, Simon
    Clayton, Philip
    NEPHROLOGY, 2024, 29 : 123 - 123
  • [32] Associations between Deceased-Donor Urine Injury Biomarkers and Kidney Transplant Outcomes
    Reese, Peter P.
    Hall, Isaac E.
    Weng, Francis L.
    Schroeppel, Bernd
    Doshi, Mona D.
    Hasz, Rick D.
    Thiessen-Philbrook, Heather
    Ficek, Joseph
    Rao, Veena
    Murray, Patrick
    Lin, Haiqun
    Parikh, Chirag R.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2016, 27 (05): : 1534 - 1543
  • [33] Deceased-Donor Acute Kidney Injury Associates with Less BK Viremia in Kidney Transplant Recipients.
    Hall, I. E.
    Reese, P. P.
    Mansour, S. G.
    Mohan, S.
    Doshi, M. D.
    Jia, Y.
    Thiessen-Philbrook, H. R.
    Akalin, E.
    Harhay, M. N.
    Muthukumar, T.
    Schroppel, B.
    Singh, P.
    Weng, F. L.
    Bromberg, J. S.
    Parikh, C. R.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2019, 19 : 545 - 545
  • [34] Outcome of Living Donor Kidney Transplant and Deceased Donor Kidney Transplant: A Retrospective Cohort Study at National Kidney and Transplant Institute.
    Burog, A. B.
    Parayno, A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2022, 22 : 795 - 795
  • [35] Long-Term Kidney Transplant Survival after Deceased-Donor Acute Kidney Injury.
    Hall, I.
    Akalin, E.
    Bromberg, J.
    Doshi, M.
    Harhay, M.
    Jia, Y.
    Mansour, S.
    Mohan, S.
    Muthumkumar, T.
    Reese, P.
    Schroppel, B.
    Singh, P.
    Thiessen-Philbrook, H.
    Weng, F.
    Parikh, C.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2018, 18 : 369 - 369
  • [36] Socioeconomic deprivation and barriers to live-donor kidney transplantation: a qualitative study of deceased-donor kidney transplant recipients
    Bailey, Phillippa K.
    Ben-Shlomo, Yoav
    Tomson, Charles R. V.
    Owen-Smith, Amanda
    BMJ OPEN, 2016, 6 (03):
  • [37] Kidney transplant candidates' and recipients' perspectives on the decision-making process to accept or refuse a deceased donor kidney offer: Trust and graft survival matter
    Khalili, Myriam
    Cardinal, Heloise
    Ballesteros, Fabian
    Fortin, Marie-Chantal
    CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2022, 36 (05)
  • [38] Return to work after deceased donor kidney transplant under the kidney allocation system
    Wherry, Kael S.
    Dowd, Bryan E.
    Kuntz, Karen M.
    Berg, Bjorn P.
    McGovern, Patricia M.
    Pruett, Timothy L.
    CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2021, 35 (11)
  • [39] Waitlisted and Transplant Patient Perspectives on Expanding Access to Deceased-Donor Kidney Transplant: A Qualitative Study
    Rosaasen, Canute
    Rosaasen, Nicola
    Mainra, Rahul
    Trachtenberg, Aaron
    Ho, Julie
    Parsons, Christina
    Delaney, Sean
    Mansell, Holly
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY HEALTH AND DISEASE, 2022, 9
  • [40] IMPACT OF DECEASED DONOR CORTICOSTEROID TREATMENT ON KIDNEY TRANSPLANT OUTCOME
    Lausevic, Mirjana
    Kravljaca, Milica
    Brkovic, Voin
    Milinkovic, Marija
    Naumovic, Radomir
    NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2017, 32