Deceased-Donor Kidney Transplant Outcome Prediction Using Artificial Intelligence to Aid Decision-Making in Kidney Allocation

被引:0
|
作者
Ali, Hatem [1 ]
Mohamed, Mahmoud [2 ]
Molnar, Miklos Z. [3 ]
Fueloep, Tibor [4 ,5 ]
Burke, Bernard [6 ]
Shroff, Arun [7 ]
Shroff, Sunil [7 ]
Briggs, David [8 ,9 ]
Krishnan, Nithya [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Coventry & Warwickshire, Coventry, England
[2] Univ Hosp Mississippi, Jackson, MS USA
[3] Univ Utah, Spencer Fox Eccles Sch Med, Dept Internal Med, Div Nephrol & Hypertens, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[4] Med Univ South Carolina, Div Nephrol, Dept Med, Charleston, SC USA
[5] Ralph H Johnson VA Med Ctr, Med Serv, Charleston, SC USA
[6] Coventry Univ, Res Ctr Hlth & Life Sci, Coventry, England
[7] MOHAN Fdn, Xtend AI, Medindia net, Gurugram, India
[8] NHS Blood & Transplant, Histocompatibil & Immunogenet, Birmingham, England
[9] Univ Birmingham, Inst Immunol & Immunotherapy, Birmingham, England
关键词
kidney allocation schemes; artificial intelligence; SURVIVAL; DISPARITIES; IMPACT; COST;
D O I
10.1097/MAT.0000000000002190
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
In kidney transplantation, pairing recipients with the highest longevity with low-risk allografts to optimize graft-donor survival is a complex challenge. Current risk prediction models exhibit limited discriminative and calibration capabilities and have not been compared to modern decision-assisting tools. We aimed to develop a highly accurate risk-stratification index using artificial intelligence (AI) techniques. Using data from the UNOS database (156,749 deceased kidney transplants, 2007-2021), we randomly divided transplants into training (80%) and validation (20%) sets. The primary measure was death-censored graft survival. Four machine learning models were assessed for calibration (integrated Brier score [IBS]) and discrimination (time-dependent concordance [CTD] index), compared with existing models. We conducted decision curve analysis and external validation using UK Transplant data. The Deep Cox mixture model showed the best discriminative performance (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.66, 0.67, and 0.68 at 6, 9, and 12 years post-transplant), with CTD at 0.66. Calibration was adequate (IBS = 0.12), while the kidney donor profile index (KDPI) model had lower CTD (0.59) and AUC (0.60). AI-based D-TOP outperformed the KDPI in evaluating transplant pairs based on graft survival, potentially enhancing deceased donor selection. Advanced computing is poised to influence kidney allocation schemes.
引用
收藏
页码:808 / 818
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Association Between Circle-Based Kidney Allocation and Receipt of a Deceased-Donor Kidney Transplant
    Cron, David
    Kuk, Arnold
    Parast, Layla
    Husain, S. Ali
    King, Kristen
    Yu, Miko
    Mohan, Sumit
    Adler, Joel
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2024, 24 (01) : S23 - S23
  • [2] Unintended Consequences of a Change in Deceased-Donor Kidney Allocation
    Cron, D. C.
    Husain, S. A.
    King, K. L.
    Mohan, S.
    Adler, J. T.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2023, 23 (06) : S518 - S519
  • [3] Improved survival prediction for kidney transplant outcome prediction using artificial intelligence-based models: Development of a UK deceased donor kidney transplant outcome prediction (UK-DTOP) Tool
    Ali, Hatem
    Shroff, Arun
    Briggs, David
    Krishnan, Nithya
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2024, 108 (09) : 159 - 159
  • [4] Improved survival prediction for kidney transplant outcome prediction using artificial intelligence-based models: Development of a UK deceased donor kidney transplant outcome prediction (UK-DTOP) Tool.
    Ali, Hatem
    Shroff, Arun
    Briggs, David
    Krishnan, Nithya
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2024, 108 (9S)
  • [5] Pre-transplant deceased donor kidney biopsy is decision-making for single versus dual kidney transplantation
    Suthar, Kamlesh
    Vanikar, Aruna V.
    Patel, Rashmi D.
    Kanodia, Kamal V.
    Nigam, Lovelesh A.
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2016, 100 (07) : S650 - S650
  • [6] Deceased-Donor Acute Kidney Injury and BK Polyomavirus in Kidney Transplant Recipients
    Hall, Isaac E.
    Reese, Peter Philip
    Mansour, Sherry G.
    Mohan, Sumit
    Jia, Yaqi
    Thiessen-Philbrook, Heather R.
    Brennan, Daniel C.
    Doshi, Mona D.
    Muthukumar, Thangamani
    Akalin, Enver
    Harhay, Meera Nair
    Schroeppel, Bernd
    Singh, Pooja
    Weng, Francis L.
    Bromberg, Jonathan S.
    Parikh, Chirag R.
    CLINICAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2021, 16 (05): : 765 - 775
  • [7] Sex Disparity in Deceased-Donor Kidney Transplant Access by Cause of Kidney Disease
    Ahearn, Patrick
    Johansen, Kirsten L.
    Tan, Jane C.
    McCulloch, Charles E.
    Grimes, Barbara A.
    Ku, Elaine
    CLINICAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2021, 16 (02): : 241 - 250
  • [8] Improved survival prediction for kidney transplant outcomes using artificial intelligence-based models: development of the UK Deceased Donor Kidney Transplant Outcome Prediction (UK-DTOP) Tool
    Ali, Hatem
    Shroff, Arun
    Soliman, Karim
    Molnar, Miklos Z.
    Sharif, Adnan
    Burke, Bernard
    Shroff, Sunil
    Briggs, David
    Krishnan, Nithya
    RENAL FAILURE, 2024, 46 (02)
  • [9] Influence of Factors Associated With the Deceased-Donor on Kidney Transplant Outcomes
    Stolyar, Alexey G.
    Budkar, Ludmila N.
    Solodushkin, Svyatoslav I.
    Iumanova, Irina F.
    EXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2015, 13 (05) : 394 - 401
  • [10] Effects of the March 2021 Allocation Policy Change on Key Deceased-donor Kidney Transplant Metrics
    Cutrone, Alissa M.
    Rega, Scott A.
    Feurer, Irene D.
    Karp, Seth J.
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2024, 108 (11) : e376 - e381