Cost-Benefit Analysis of Mulch Film Management and Its Policy Implications in Northern China

被引:2
|
作者
Hao, Aibo [1 ,2 ]
Yin, Changbin [1 ,3 ]
Leonard, Angelique [4 ]
Dogot, Thomas [2 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Agr Sci, Inst Agr Resources & Reg Planning, State Key Lab Efficient Utilizat Arid & Semiarid A, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Liege, TERRA Teaching & Res Ctr, Econ & Rural Dev Lab, Gembloux Agrobio Tech, B-5030 Gembloux, Belgium
[3] Res Ctr Agr Green Dev China, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Liege, Dept Appl Chem, Lab Chem Engn, B-4000 Liege, Belgium
来源
AGRICULTURE-BASEL | 2024年 / 14卷 / 07期
关键词
mulch film management; cost-benefit analysis; thicker mulch film; biodegradable mulch film; policy implication; AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION; PLASTIC FILM; WASTE;
D O I
10.3390/agriculture14071081
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Agricultural white pollution is a pressing concern in China. However, the efficiency and rationality of the government's subsidies for mulch film management remain ambiguous. To formulate reasonable policies for mulch film management and optimize fiscal resource allocation, the study employs cost-benefit analysis to evaluate the economic performance of mulch film management. Two environmentally friendly measures being primarily proposed in China, namely the application of thicker mulch film (hereinafter referred to as thicker film) and the substitution of biodegradable mulch film (hereinafter referred to as biodegradable film), are selected for analysis, with conventional mulch film (hereinafter referred to as conventional film) serving as the benchmark for comparison. Primary data obtained through field surveys, supplemented by secondary data from national statistics, industry reports, and literature reviews, are used for the study. Results show that thicker film application is cost-effective, with a net benefit of CNY 3208.8/ha (USD 449.2/ha; 1 CNY = 0.14 USD), which is CNY 253.8/ha (USD 35.5/ha) higher than that of conventional film. The net benefit for biodegradable film application is lower than that for conventional film, at CNY 2244.6/ha (USD 314.2/ha). The results reveal the significant potential of promoting the use of thicker film due to its recycling and economic advantages. Findings imply that the further promotion of its use lies in improving farmers' cognition and optimizing subsidy dimensions to allocate government financial resources more effectively. On the contrary, biodegradable film utilization is unprofitable and relies on continuous external subsidies. The government can optimize the subsidy standard based on the cost-benefit performance of different mulch films applied and provide incentives to promote cost reductions and efficiency increases. Further analysis indicates that sustainable mulch film management entails developing mechanisms to internalize the external benefits of management and innovating a new governance landscape.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Cost-Benefit Analysis of the responsibility of water rights users in China
    Xie, Wenxuan
    2009 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, INNOVATION MANAGEMENT AND INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, VOL 2, PROCEEDINGS, 2009, : 272 - 275
  • [42] Cost-Benefit Analysis of Pumped Hydroelectricity Storage Investment in China
    Sospiro, Paolo
    Nibbi, Leonardo
    Liscio, Marco Ciro
    De Lucia, Maurizio
    ENERGIES, 2021, 14 (24)
  • [43] Cost-Benefit Analysis of China's Internet Content Regulation
    Song, Qiang
    Li, Gang
    FIFTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION ASSURANCE AND SECURITY, VOL 2, PROCEEDINGS, 2009, : 571 - 575
  • [44] Barriers to promoting prefabricated construction in China: A cost-benefit analysis
    Hong, Jingke
    Shen, Geoffrey Qiping
    Li, Zhengdao
    Zhang, Boyu
    Zhang, Wanqiu
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 172 : 649 - 660
  • [45] The Cost-Benefit Fallacy: Why Cost-Benefit Analysis Is Broken and How to Fix It
    Flyvbjerg, Bent
    Bester, Dirk W.
    JOURNAL OF BENEFIT-COST ANALYSIS, 2021, 12 (03) : 395 - 419
  • [46] Cost-benefit analysis of waste photovoltaic module recycling in China
    Liu, Caijie
    Zhang, Qin
    Wang, Hai
    WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2020, 118 : 491 - 500
  • [47] Improving media decisions in China - A targetability and cost-benefit analysis
    Hung, K
    Gu, FF
    Tse, DK
    JOURNAL OF ADVERTISING, 2005, 34 (01) : 49 - 63
  • [48] Cost-Benefit Analysis Developing Offshore Wind Energy in China
    Liu, Ru
    Zhao, Junchao
    Li, Hui
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2015 INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ENERGY SCIENCE AND CHEMICAL ENGINEERING (ISESCE 2015), 2016, 45 : 374 - 378
  • [49] Beware the cost-benefit analysis
    Spence, Des
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2012, 345
  • [50] Cost-Benefit Analysis in Reasoning
    Alaoui, Larbi
    Penta, Antonio
    JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2022, : 881 - 925