Cost-Benefit Analysis of Mulch Film Management and Its Policy Implications in Northern China

被引:2
|
作者
Hao, Aibo [1 ,2 ]
Yin, Changbin [1 ,3 ]
Leonard, Angelique [4 ]
Dogot, Thomas [2 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Agr Sci, Inst Agr Resources & Reg Planning, State Key Lab Efficient Utilizat Arid & Semiarid A, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Liege, TERRA Teaching & Res Ctr, Econ & Rural Dev Lab, Gembloux Agrobio Tech, B-5030 Gembloux, Belgium
[3] Res Ctr Agr Green Dev China, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Liege, Dept Appl Chem, Lab Chem Engn, B-4000 Liege, Belgium
来源
AGRICULTURE-BASEL | 2024年 / 14卷 / 07期
关键词
mulch film management; cost-benefit analysis; thicker mulch film; biodegradable mulch film; policy implication; AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION; PLASTIC FILM; WASTE;
D O I
10.3390/agriculture14071081
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Agricultural white pollution is a pressing concern in China. However, the efficiency and rationality of the government's subsidies for mulch film management remain ambiguous. To formulate reasonable policies for mulch film management and optimize fiscal resource allocation, the study employs cost-benefit analysis to evaluate the economic performance of mulch film management. Two environmentally friendly measures being primarily proposed in China, namely the application of thicker mulch film (hereinafter referred to as thicker film) and the substitution of biodegradable mulch film (hereinafter referred to as biodegradable film), are selected for analysis, with conventional mulch film (hereinafter referred to as conventional film) serving as the benchmark for comparison. Primary data obtained through field surveys, supplemented by secondary data from national statistics, industry reports, and literature reviews, are used for the study. Results show that thicker film application is cost-effective, with a net benefit of CNY 3208.8/ha (USD 449.2/ha; 1 CNY = 0.14 USD), which is CNY 253.8/ha (USD 35.5/ha) higher than that of conventional film. The net benefit for biodegradable film application is lower than that for conventional film, at CNY 2244.6/ha (USD 314.2/ha). The results reveal the significant potential of promoting the use of thicker film due to its recycling and economic advantages. Findings imply that the further promotion of its use lies in improving farmers' cognition and optimizing subsidy dimensions to allocate government financial resources more effectively. On the contrary, biodegradable film utilization is unprofitable and relies on continuous external subsidies. The government can optimize the subsidy standard based on the cost-benefit performance of different mulch films applied and provide incentives to promote cost reductions and efficiency increases. Further analysis indicates that sustainable mulch film management entails developing mechanisms to internalize the external benefits of management and innovating a new governance landscape.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Cost-Benefit Analysis of Urban Fire Stations Management
    Kang Canhua
    Wu Wei
    Yan Xi
    E-BUSINESS, MANAGEMENT AND ECONOMICS, 2011, 3 : 56 - +
  • [32] Cost-benefit assessment and implications for service pricing of electric taxies in China
    Wang, Ning
    Liu, Yafei
    Fu, Gangzhan
    Li, Yun
    ENERGY FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2015, 27 : 137 - 146
  • [33] Editorial - Cost-Benefit Analysis to Inform Water Policy Debate
    Becker, Nir
    Ward, Frank A.
    WATER ECONOMICS AND POLICY, 2023, 09 (03)
  • [34] Cost-benefit analysis: a disparagement of its misuse and misexplanation
    Linn, Mott, Jr.
    BOTTOM LINE, 2009, 22 (03): : 82 - 85
  • [35] The narrow margins of the dutch drug policy: A cost-benefit analysis
    Van Dijk J.J.M.
    European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 1998, 6 (3) : 369 - 393
  • [36] Improving air pollution control policy in China-A perspective based on cost-benefit analysis
    Gao, Jinglei
    Yuan, Zengwei
    Liu, Xuewei
    Xia, Xiaoming
    Huang, Xianjin
    Dong, Zhanfeng
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2016, 543 : 307 - 314
  • [37] Cost-Benefit Analysis of Financial Regulation: Case Studies and Implications
    Coates, John C.
    YALE LAW JOURNAL, 2015, 124 (04): : 882 - 1011
  • [38] Winter problems on mountain passes - Implications for cost-benefit analysis
    Bardal, Kjersti Granas
    Mathisen, Terje Andreas
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2015, 74 : 59 - 72
  • [39] Unreliable trains and induced rescheduling: implications for cost-benefit analysis
    Yin-Yen Tseng
    Piet Rietveld
    Erik T. Verhoef
    Transportation, 2012, 39 : 387 - 407
  • [40] Unreliable trains and induced rescheduling: implications for cost-benefit analysis
    Tseng, Yin-Yen
    Rietveld, Piet
    Verhoef, Erik T.
    TRANSPORTATION, 2012, 39 (02) : 387 - 407