Cost-Benefit Analysis of Mulch Film Management and Its Policy Implications in Northern China

被引:2
|
作者
Hao, Aibo [1 ,2 ]
Yin, Changbin [1 ,3 ]
Leonard, Angelique [4 ]
Dogot, Thomas [2 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Agr Sci, Inst Agr Resources & Reg Planning, State Key Lab Efficient Utilizat Arid & Semiarid A, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Liege, TERRA Teaching & Res Ctr, Econ & Rural Dev Lab, Gembloux Agrobio Tech, B-5030 Gembloux, Belgium
[3] Res Ctr Agr Green Dev China, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Liege, Dept Appl Chem, Lab Chem Engn, B-4000 Liege, Belgium
来源
AGRICULTURE-BASEL | 2024年 / 14卷 / 07期
关键词
mulch film management; cost-benefit analysis; thicker mulch film; biodegradable mulch film; policy implication; AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION; PLASTIC FILM; WASTE;
D O I
10.3390/agriculture14071081
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Agricultural white pollution is a pressing concern in China. However, the efficiency and rationality of the government's subsidies for mulch film management remain ambiguous. To formulate reasonable policies for mulch film management and optimize fiscal resource allocation, the study employs cost-benefit analysis to evaluate the economic performance of mulch film management. Two environmentally friendly measures being primarily proposed in China, namely the application of thicker mulch film (hereinafter referred to as thicker film) and the substitution of biodegradable mulch film (hereinafter referred to as biodegradable film), are selected for analysis, with conventional mulch film (hereinafter referred to as conventional film) serving as the benchmark for comparison. Primary data obtained through field surveys, supplemented by secondary data from national statistics, industry reports, and literature reviews, are used for the study. Results show that thicker film application is cost-effective, with a net benefit of CNY 3208.8/ha (USD 449.2/ha; 1 CNY = 0.14 USD), which is CNY 253.8/ha (USD 35.5/ha) higher than that of conventional film. The net benefit for biodegradable film application is lower than that for conventional film, at CNY 2244.6/ha (USD 314.2/ha). The results reveal the significant potential of promoting the use of thicker film due to its recycling and economic advantages. Findings imply that the further promotion of its use lies in improving farmers' cognition and optimizing subsidy dimensions to allocate government financial resources more effectively. On the contrary, biodegradable film utilization is unprofitable and relies on continuous external subsidies. The government can optimize the subsidy standard based on the cost-benefit performance of different mulch films applied and provide incentives to promote cost reductions and efficiency increases. Further analysis indicates that sustainable mulch film management entails developing mechanisms to internalize the external benefits of management and innovating a new governance landscape.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] China's three north shelter forest program: cost-benefit analysis and policy implications
    Suo, Xinhao
    Cao, Shixiong
    ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 23 (10) : 14605 - 14618
  • [2] Cost-benefit analysis and environmental policy
    Pearce, D
    OXFORD REVIEW OF ECONOMIC POLICY, 1998, 14 (04) : 84 - 100
  • [3] THE COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS IN THE MANAGEMENT OF IT PROJECTS
    Melnic, Andreia-Simona
    METALURGIA INTERNATIONAL, 2010, 15 : 66 - 69
  • [5] Cost-benefit analysis and forest policy - Introduction
    Hanley, Nick
    Shogren, Jason
    JOURNAL OF FOREST ECONOMICS, 2007, 13 (2-3) : 73 - 74
  • [6] COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS IN SAFETY POLICY MAKING
    DAVIES, N
    CHEMISTRY & INDUSTRY, 1989, (08) : 251 - 256
  • [7] Cost-benefit model and policy analysis of waste paper recycling system in China
    Liu, Ling-Xuan
    Bi, Jun
    Yuan, Zeng-Wei
    Zhang, Bing
    Xitong Gongcheng Lilun yu Shijian/System Engineering Theory and Practice, 2009, 29 (05): : 76 - 82
  • [8] Cost-benefit analysis of ecosystem services in China
    Cao, Shixiong
    Yu, Zhongqi
    Zhang, Junze
    Feng, Fei
    Xu, Duanyang
    Mu, Xingmin
    ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2018, 125 : 143 - 148
  • [9] A cost-benefit analysis for the economic growth in China
    Wen, Zongguo
    Chen, Jining
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2008, 65 (02) : 356 - 366
  • [10] Cost-benefit analysis of environmental management systems
    Kern, S
    PAPIER, 1999, 53 (03): : 152 - 153